So the Guy Holding the Leash is in Charge of Nuclear Waste

a reply to: TDawg61

Yeah, it's insane. They are clearly intentionally antagonizing society.
Like it's society's fault no one likes the selected (and advertised as) inappropriate shower guy.

a reply to: Mandroid7

Eh? What's the connection here? Why do you bring up a serial killer?
That seems more like an issue in your head if that's your reflex.

a reply to: Peeple

Yeah, I'm not sure where I was going with that.

But we are in end times when the script is flipped to demonizing successful people and raising sex perverts to leadership positions.

Added..that's where I was going with that, just didn't make much sense, since he was outwardly fairly normal.

a reply to: ketsuko

I'm relatively indifferent towards a persons sex life. Although, I would prefer not to know anything about it.

The real question for me is if he is actually qualified for the job or if he was put in place just so they could say they put a weirdo in there? You don't have to answer. I already assume he is otherwise unqualified.

I think the liberal party has become the most amoral, disgusting group of people on the planet. There have been rumors for decades on deviant sex parties among high-level politicians, but this is certainly no rumor. It's like they don't even care anymore what the citizens think of them and want to rub our face in their filth.

Are people realizing that 'sticks and stone may break my bones, but mean tweets will never hurt me'?

The Brandon administration and the left is packed full of morally and ethically bankrupt sickos, this isn't much of a surprise to me.

What causes conservatives to be so interested in other peoples sex lives? I think I know, but let's not get banned for discussing it.

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: ketsuko

What does his sexlife have to do with how competent they are for the job?
Plus a satisfied person is probably a lot more stable than a frustrated or surpressed one don't you think?

No.
Just no.
Hail to the no .

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: ketsuko

What does his sexlife have to do with how competent they are for the job?
Plus a satisfied person is probably a lot more stable than a frustrated or surpressed one don't you think?

Said someone who has never experienced an fbi background check.

Or understood why such things are necessary.

Certain positions require the closest things to saints that we can find, for important reasons.

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: ketsuko

What does his sexlife have to do with how competent they are for the job?
Plus a satisfied person is probably a lot more stable than a frustrated or surpressed one don't you think?

Well...

We are talking nuclear waste here, perhaps if it were something a little less crucial. This is kind of a serious task, not sure if rouge mohawk is up to it. This is what conformations are for however is it not?

Did you see Rand Paul questioning Rachel Levine and them repeating the same canned answer over and over, it was a question that deserved an answer, seriously not evading because it hurt their feelz. Im concerned about Levine's judgment, they were the one that removed their Mom from a nursing home right before they recommended sending the COVID sick to nursing homes in Pennsylvania

It's not about sexual peccadillos and preferences it's about competence, I don't care what anybody does with another consenting adult(s). In the real world, a serious corporate entity would want the potential distraction, both of these nominees bring. Shouldn't we have the same standards in the Whitehouse

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: ketsuko

What does his sexlife have to do with how competent they are for the job?
Plus a satisfied person is probably a lot more stable than a frustrated or surpressed one don't you think?

No.
Just no.
Hail to the no .

At least the guy in the doggie costume isn’t a midget. 😶

originally posted by: Brotherman

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: ketsuko

What does his sexlife have to do with how competent they are for the job?
Plus a satisfied person is probably a lot more stable than a frustrated or surpressed one don't you think?

No.
Just no.
Hail to the no .

At least the guy in the doggie costume isn’t a midget. 😶

Russian spy.

Hired by a ccp spy.

Who is double agent for an isis midget bomb builder.

a reply to: Mandroid7

Those are not the people you need to be afraid of.
I mean 'liberated' people. We've got far bigger issues than sex.
I mean there's a point when it gets everything and an addiction, which happens with sex a lot faster than you'd think.
The guy is organized and his deviant ways are much more rational and regulated showing more comittment than those of the majority of normalos out there.
Dude's loyal. And more considerate than most.

a reply to: Peeple

I wouldn't put a guy with 'preferred' pronouns in charge of anything. I'd also keep well away from those that have the urge to put their sexual fetishes on display. I have no respect for those types.

originally posted by: Brotherman

originally posted by: Gothmog

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: ketsuko

What does his sexlife have to do with how competent they are for the job?
Plus a satisfied person is probably a lot more stable than a frustrated or surpressed one don't you think?

No.
Just no.
Hail to the no .

At least the guy in the doggie costume isn’t a midget. 😶

Little person! 😛

originally posted by: Peeple
a reply to: Mandroid7

Those are not the people you need to be afraid of.
I mean 'liberated' people. We've got far bigger issues than sex.
I mean there's a point when it gets everything and an addiction, which happens with sex a lot faster than you'd think.
The guy is organized and his deviant ways are much more rational and regulated showing more comittment than those of the majority of normalos out there.
Dude's loyal. And more considerate than most.

Is it us deplorables you need to worry about?

Or are we called domestic terrorists now?

a reply to: midicon

Maybe exactly how you're reacting is exciting him beyond ...happy
The Next three 'holy halleluja I'm coming!' are dedicated to you.

Possibly. How does that make you feel?
And what other reason do you believe he has for this display?
Attention.

a reply to: Ghostsdogood

Yeah no thank you. I'm not playing.
This narrow 'there are only two types of people' crap is just vulgar.