It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: just4fun
The lawsuits were never meant to actually succeed .
The people that own the media are the same people who own Dominion so are they gonna sue themselves?
They were only meant as a reason for the media to not be allowed to talk about it.
They all said "Oh know we might get sued we better apologize and never talk about dominion again"
Even Fox news and Newsmax apologized.
Lindell and Powell are the only ones with any balls
THE MEDIA IS NOT SCARED OF A LAWSUIT
remember how NewsMax and FoxNews apologized for reporting what others were saying about Dominion Voting Systems! How crazy is that?
originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: carewemust
I think November will be a Democratic Party landslide, at least enough for a super-majority IF they succeed in implementing Mail In voting and absentee voter fraud as expected.
More at: wccfradio.iheart.com...
The House Republicans in Pennsylvania are going to hold a press conference this morning to address Dominion's failure to appear because that's exactly what happened.
They didn't show up.
Since Election Day, over 100 out of 243 Dominion employees on LinkedIn have deleted their profiles. This is not a good sign for a company. Over 40% of Dominion's employees with profiles on LinkedIn on Election Day, have since eliminated their profiles.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
SOP.
Whenever someone files a civil lawsuit, it is common for the defendant to file a countersuit. Whenever anyone files a civil lawsuit, it is common for the defendant in that lawsuit to claim the lawsuit is frivolous or in some way not worth the court's time.
Dominion filed a lawsuit against Lindell, probably in hopes of scaring Lindell into silence. Instead, Lindell stood his ground and filed a countersuit. I'd bet good money he also had his lawyers dispute the lawsuit initially. Now Dominion is going to dispute the countersuit against them. I would be surprised (but not shocked considering the present political climate) if both suits didn't either go ahead or suits were settled out of court.
It's just the way the law works. Both sides want to win their suit and not lose the one against them.
TheRedneck
originally posted by: JinMI
My laymans view is that they are trying to weasel out of discovery.
originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: carewemust
Easy, The legal system is just as corrupt as our ruling party and most of our judges and lawyers support same ruling party and will do their bidding.
You can't win a witch hunt when the Justice system and Judge has already determined the outcome no matter what evidence there is.
What evidence, not allowed, national security, etc. etc.
originally posted by: carewemust
Tuesday, February 1, 2022
Seeking guidance from ATS members who understand our (U.S.) legal system.
Dominion Software Company sued Mike Lindell (owner of MyPillow) for $1.3 Billion dollars, because he accused them of helping to perpetrate election fraud that made Joe Biden beat Donald Trump in November 2020.
More at: www.businessinsider.com...
Dominion Voting Systems asked a federal judge on Monday night to allow the company's defamation lawsuit against Mike Lindell to proceed, arguing that the MyPillow CEO's arguments in the case "threaten the rule of law."
"If allowed to proceed, they would impose liability on innumerable parties engaging in ordinary, day-to-day acts of litigation," Dominion's attorneys wrote of Lindell's counterclaims in the case. "They would deter future litigants from bringing their disputes to court in the first place."
Dominion sued Lindell and MyPillow in February of 2021, claiming $1.3 billion in damages and alleging they defamed the election technology company by pushing lies about its role in the 2020 election.
It's part of a spate of lawsuits Dominion filed against election conspiracy theorists and media entities it says platformed them.
Lindell filed a counterclaim in December, alleging Dominion was engaged in an illegal conspiracy to punish him through litigation, and rehashing falsehoods, claiming the company manipulated election results so that then-President Donald Trump would lose the 2020 election.
HOW can Mike Lindell's interaction with Dominion Voting Systems within the U.S. legal system, "threaten the rule of law"?
HOW can Dominion legally say Lindell's claims are "falsehoods", if no court has ruled either way?
---------------
While we're on the subject, Dominion Voting Systems said back on January 25th that it "could not settle suits" it brought against pro-Trump attorneys, Rudy Giuliani and Sydney Powell.
Details here: www.reuters.com...
For a company who trumpeted, and had all the MSM praising it, for suing the daylights out of Trump affiliated lawyers 12 months ago, Dominion sure doesn't seem to be on the offensive any longer. Or is it merely trying a different approach?
-CareWeMust
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: Kaiju666
originally posted by: carewemust
Tuesday, February 1, 2022
Seeking guidance from ATS members who understand our (U.S.) legal system.
Dominion Software Company sued Mike Lindell (owner of MyPillow) for $1.3 Billion dollars, because he accused them of helping to perpetrate election fraud that made Joe Biden beat Donald Trump in November 2020.
More at: www.businessinsider.com...
Dominion Voting Systems asked a federal judge on Monday night to allow the company's defamation lawsuit against Mike Lindell to proceed, arguing that the MyPillow CEO's arguments in the case "threaten the rule of law."
"If allowed to proceed, they would impose liability on innumerable parties engaging in ordinary, day-to-day acts of litigation," Dominion's attorneys wrote of Lindell's counterclaims in the case. "They would deter future litigants from bringing their disputes to court in the first place."
Dominion sued Lindell and MyPillow in February of 2021, claiming $1.3 billion in damages and alleging they defamed the election technology company by pushing lies about its role in the 2020 election.
It's part of a spate of lawsuits Dominion filed against election conspiracy theorists and media entities it says platformed them.
Lindell filed a counterclaim in December, alleging Dominion was engaged in an illegal conspiracy to punish him through litigation, and rehashing falsehoods, claiming the company manipulated election results so that then-President Donald Trump would lose the 2020 election.
HOW can Mike Lindell's interaction with Dominion Voting Systems within the U.S. legal system, "threaten the rule of law"?
HOW can Dominion legally say Lindell's claims are "falsehoods", if no court has ruled either way?
---------------
While we're on the subject, Dominion Voting Systems said back on January 25th that it "could not settle suits" it brought against pro-Trump attorneys, Rudy Giuliani and Sydney Powell.
Details here: www.reuters.com...
For a company who trumpeted, and had all the MSM praising it, for suing the daylights out of Trump affiliated lawyers 12 months ago, Dominion sure doesn't seem to be on the offensive any longer. Or is it merely trying a different approach?
-CareWeMust
I didn’t/don’t have time to watch any of Lindell’s symposium. But if you’re smart, you make it look weak so you do get sued. Bring the good stuff later. How do you get evidence in court legally? And whatnot. Dominions response is just typical narcissistic deflection to hope they look not guilty.
While these suits drag out, if Dominion is guilty of perpetrating election fraud, it can do so again in the states that will use Dominion Voting Systems hardware/software, this coming November.
There needs to be a DOJ investigation. Maybe that would move faster.
originally posted by: carewemust
There needs to be a DOJ investigation.