It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Whistleblower from Blackrock exposes fraud & liability at highest levels Pfizer Moderna, etc..
page: 2share:
What you either fail to grasp, or refuse to confirm, is that the people who are directing the outworkings of the pandemic & vaccine response to the
pandemic, at the highest level, simply do not need money in the way that you & I need money. They are far more concerned with the furtherance of
their ideological bent, resting comfortably on their laurels - the unacknowledged trillionnaires of the world, who are behind central banking & the
most massive corporations, who don't permit you to know who they are, according to information available on Vanguard, for example.
If you think that they are concerned with keeping their relatively minor investment projects open & functioning long-term as they are currently (because as you said, they have money in everything), then YOU simply haven't gained a proper oversight of what has unfolded in economic terms since this pandemic & vaccine response began, which is that there was a deliberate erosion of middle class enterprise in favour of the rich, forcing small business owners into administration/bankruptcy by the policy of lockdowns.
They started small, with the self-employed & small businesses, and as time has gone by there has been, by the effect of lockdown policy, a major shift from spending with small to mid-sized retail businesses (who would normally obtain their market share of public purchases via footfall), to the lockdown-resultant trend of a lot more money being spent online with big retailers who can administer excellent websites with high functionality & a broader range of products & a better delivery service than the smaller stores - even mid-sized corporate chains have been impacted, as is frequently reported in the financial press.
In my own life, as just one example in millions with regards domestic spending, our spending on goods needed to support our lifestyle has sadly shifted to Amazon, almost 100% of the time, because as a disabled man who can't walk around stores anyway, and with the impact of the lockdowns & failures of many smaller businesses in our local town centre, it has been unfortunate but we felt there wasn't really any way to get around that, in light of how much time would otherwise be spent online trying to source the various types of goods we need.
You should also have noted that the only stores which were allowed to reopen at some point after or partway through the lockdowns were the so-called 'big box' stores, such as Walmart in the USA, whereas smaller businesses were not afforded that courtesy. There has thus been a transition in where we spend our money collectively, as societies at large, from the smaller stores to the larger stores. As we continue under the influence of universally horrible pandemic policy, regardless of where in the world we live, this trend will continue, and I predict that we will see a lot of mergers between former 'competitors' such as Coca Cola & Pepsi, if not in the branded outlets then certainly in the parent companies.
What is happening is that they are driving us to a cartelised corporate system in which companies will trade by agreed-upon geographical regions or product-centric categories of goods, leaving us the consumer with far less 'choice' in terms of where we shop & what we purchase, even though the range of products will remain more or less varied for now (though possibly the makers of 'a Clockwork Orange' were onto something with their unbranded poverty 'choices' of one type of each foodstuff - obviously that's a cariacature, but the point remains that product variety will probably shrink over the longer term, to become 'more efficient', being less concerned with pleasing us with a wide variety of goods as they once were). Certainly, smaller businesses within the trading sites such as Amazon CAN be absorbed, and if they are profitable in their own right then they WILL be absorbed, as the movement to a cartelised system takes place.
As we've already seen, competition between larger brands is largely illusory, because there are already only a handful of big investment corporations which own literally 95% of what's out there - the only reason we believe there is free choice in our domestic supply line providers is because they have chosen to let the illusion stand for the moment. But you can bet your bottom dollar that they want to merge, streamline & accunulate, just as has been strategy ever since the corporation was invented - only now, that small group of massive corporations has weasled its way to the top after perhaps hundreds of years, and can now afford to live like gods & push their ideology to the next level - utilising the deliberately created cover of the pandemic to 'radically reshape & reset our world', as per Klaus 'Death Star' Schwab of the World Economic Forum with their 'Great Reset', shifting those of us who survive what has begun towards some sort of communistic global superstate. And yes, the vaccines are being used to thin the herd, remember they don't need our money any more, they are living gods of the Earth, completely insulated in their bubbles of sheer luxury, with vast wealth & land ownership. They will control facets of the cartelised system, and the survivors of their herd-thinning will work as de facto slaves within their high-technocracy, a largely roboticised smart city grid economic system, producing goods mainly for their own benefit, though also providing for the basic survival of the slaves.
You are the one who needs to understand; I'm perfectly satisfied with my general understanding of the broad strokes picture which is developing. It will take decades to complete, but that's what they're aiming at.
In fact, your issue with my understanding (incorporating the massive complexity of the corporate markets) actually helped me to pad out my understanding in a way that CONFIRMS my suspicions regarding the nefarious nature of ultra high-level economic policy in the context of the COVID narrative & governmental/ intergovernmental lockdown & restrictions policy response/ vaccine rollout. I hadn't been aware of Black Rock or Vanguard until after creating this thread. But now I know a bit about them, everything else becomes a whole lot clearer. And it's #ing dark.
If you think that they are concerned with keeping their relatively minor investment projects open & functioning long-term as they are currently (because as you said, they have money in everything), then YOU simply haven't gained a proper oversight of what has unfolded in economic terms since this pandemic & vaccine response began, which is that there was a deliberate erosion of middle class enterprise in favour of the rich, forcing small business owners into administration/bankruptcy by the policy of lockdowns.
They started small, with the self-employed & small businesses, and as time has gone by there has been, by the effect of lockdown policy, a major shift from spending with small to mid-sized retail businesses (who would normally obtain their market share of public purchases via footfall), to the lockdown-resultant trend of a lot more money being spent online with big retailers who can administer excellent websites with high functionality & a broader range of products & a better delivery service than the smaller stores - even mid-sized corporate chains have been impacted, as is frequently reported in the financial press.
In my own life, as just one example in millions with regards domestic spending, our spending on goods needed to support our lifestyle has sadly shifted to Amazon, almost 100% of the time, because as a disabled man who can't walk around stores anyway, and with the impact of the lockdowns & failures of many smaller businesses in our local town centre, it has been unfortunate but we felt there wasn't really any way to get around that, in light of how much time would otherwise be spent online trying to source the various types of goods we need.
You should also have noted that the only stores which were allowed to reopen at some point after or partway through the lockdowns were the so-called 'big box' stores, such as Walmart in the USA, whereas smaller businesses were not afforded that courtesy. There has thus been a transition in where we spend our money collectively, as societies at large, from the smaller stores to the larger stores. As we continue under the influence of universally horrible pandemic policy, regardless of where in the world we live, this trend will continue, and I predict that we will see a lot of mergers between former 'competitors' such as Coca Cola & Pepsi, if not in the branded outlets then certainly in the parent companies.
What is happening is that they are driving us to a cartelised corporate system in which companies will trade by agreed-upon geographical regions or product-centric categories of goods, leaving us the consumer with far less 'choice' in terms of where we shop & what we purchase, even though the range of products will remain more or less varied for now (though possibly the makers of 'a Clockwork Orange' were onto something with their unbranded poverty 'choices' of one type of each foodstuff - obviously that's a cariacature, but the point remains that product variety will probably shrink over the longer term, to become 'more efficient', being less concerned with pleasing us with a wide variety of goods as they once were). Certainly, smaller businesses within the trading sites such as Amazon CAN be absorbed, and if they are profitable in their own right then they WILL be absorbed, as the movement to a cartelised system takes place.
As we've already seen, competition between larger brands is largely illusory, because there are already only a handful of big investment corporations which own literally 95% of what's out there - the only reason we believe there is free choice in our domestic supply line providers is because they have chosen to let the illusion stand for the moment. But you can bet your bottom dollar that they want to merge, streamline & accunulate, just as has been strategy ever since the corporation was invented - only now, that small group of massive corporations has weasled its way to the top after perhaps hundreds of years, and can now afford to live like gods & push their ideology to the next level - utilising the deliberately created cover of the pandemic to 'radically reshape & reset our world', as per Klaus 'Death Star' Schwab of the World Economic Forum with their 'Great Reset', shifting those of us who survive what has begun towards some sort of communistic global superstate. And yes, the vaccines are being used to thin the herd, remember they don't need our money any more, they are living gods of the Earth, completely insulated in their bubbles of sheer luxury, with vast wealth & land ownership. They will control facets of the cartelised system, and the survivors of their herd-thinning will work as de facto slaves within their high-technocracy, a largely roboticised smart city grid economic system, producing goods mainly for their own benefit, though also providing for the basic survival of the slaves.
You are the one who needs to understand; I'm perfectly satisfied with my general understanding of the broad strokes picture which is developing. It will take decades to complete, but that's what they're aiming at.
In fact, your issue with my understanding (incorporating the massive complexity of the corporate markets) actually helped me to pad out my understanding in a way that CONFIRMS my suspicions regarding the nefarious nature of ultra high-level economic policy in the context of the COVID narrative & governmental/ intergovernmental lockdown & restrictions policy response/ vaccine rollout. I hadn't been aware of Black Rock or Vanguard until after creating this thread. But now I know a bit about them, everything else becomes a whole lot clearer. And it's #ing dark.
edit on FebruaryWednesday2202CST11America/Chicago-060027 by FlyInTheOintment because: important clarification
a reply to: FlyInTheOintment
Again, pick up a basic economics book and then try to jam your depop agenda into one where there's no clients for the so called 'elite' to sell their goods to.
Again, pick up a basic economics book and then try to jam your depop agenda into one where there's no clients for the so called 'elite' to sell their goods to.
Just also want to include the following thread - The Biggest Story Not Being Talked About
- The Pfizer Whistleblower - in addition to the assessment of the information in this thread, as the information from the Pfizer whistleblower,
there is the independent confirmation of that whistleblower's information which was confirmed by the
British Medical Journal.
The information basically shows how Pfizer have comprehensively faked, ignored, mismanaged & manipulated data in the clinical trials , and the whistleblower testimony, and the data which evidences her claims, fundamentally undermines the supposed successful trials of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine, it has again been artificially manipulated to seem more palatable as proof of their claims. The whistleblower from Pfizer, and the British Mdical Journal's confirmations of their data, have basically laid it out clearly - the basis for these mRNA vaccine efficacy reports is fraudulent - just like the Black Rock whistleblower in this thread has claimed is the case.
So now, we have Pfizer & Black Rock whistleblowers both saying that the basis of these vaccines is fraud perpetrated by Pfizer, and you can basically guarantee that the other companies producing vaccines almost certainly went off the same playbook. That's because this pandemic virus was a bioweapon released so that noxious poison could be delivered into the bodies of billions of people worldwide - they allowed the trials to be deliberately shoddy so they could conceal the toxic basis of what they were injecting.
All this so that the ultra-elites can euthanise us, while developing a cartelised world finance/economic system with a heavily reduced, controlled & influenced 'untouchable' population meekly operating as slaves to provide for their masters' luxurious lifestyles, and the improved lifestyle of the managers (politicians) in a world which has been 'reshaped' - yeah, reshaped by having less common humans to pollute their view of the landscape.
out of any story, this one is more important. That's because it's the literal foundation on which the mRNA vaccine argument is based on. The actual efficacy data was already questionable, but if this already questionable data was manipulated to make it seem more palitable, it's an earth shaking admission.
But first, let's rewind the clock 12 years. In 2009 Pfizer paid the largest criminal fine in history for paying off doctors, and faking trial results, among other things:
Pfizer promoted the sale of Bextra for several uses and dosages that the FDA specifically declined to approve due to safety concerns. The company will pay a criminal fine of $1.195 billion, the largest criminal fine ever imposed in the United States for any matter. Pharmacia & Upjohn will also forfeit $105 million, for a total criminal resolution of $1.3 billion.
Pfizer fined 1.3 billion - Justice Department
Revelations of poor practices at a contract research company helping to carry out Pfizer’s pivotal covid-19 vaccine trial raise questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight. Paul D Thacker reports
In autumn 2020 Pfizer’s chairman and chief executive, Albert Bourla, released an open letter to the billions of people around the world who were investing their hopes in a safe and effective covid-19 vaccine to end the pandemic. “As I’ve said before, we are operating at the speed of science,” Bourla wrote, explaining to the public when they could expect a Pfizer vaccine to be authorised in the United States.1
But, for researchers who were testing Pfizer’s vaccine at several sites in Texas during that autumn, speed may have come at the cost of data integrity and patient safety. A regional director who was employed at the research organisation Ventavia Research Group has told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial. Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding. After repeatedly notifying Ventavia of these problems, the regional director, Brook Jackson, emailed a complaint to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Ventavia fired her later the same day. Jackson has provided The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails.
Poor laboratory management
On its website Ventavia calls itself the largest privately owned clinical research company in Texas and lists many awards it has won for its contract work.2 But Jackson has told The BMJ that, during the two weeks she was employed at Ventavia in September 2020, she repeatedly informed her superiors of poor laboratory management, patient safety concerns, and data integrity issues. Jackson was a trained clinical trial auditor who previously held a director of operations position and came to Ventavia with more than 15 years’ experience in clinical research coordination and management. Exasperated that Ventavia was not dealing with the problems, Jackson documented several matters late one night, taking photos on her mobile phone. One photo, provided to The BMJ, showed needles discarded in a plastic biohazard bag instead of a sharps container box. Another showed vaccine packaging materials with trial participants’ identification numbers written on them left out in the open, potentially unblinding participants. Ventavia executives later questioned Jackson for taking the photos.
Early and inadvertent unblinding may have occurred on a far wider scale. According to the trial’s design, unblinded staff were responsible for preparing and administering the study drug (Pfizer’s vaccine or a placebo). This was to be done to preserve the blinding of trial participants and all other site staff, including the principal investigator. However, at Ventavia, Jackson told The BMJ that drug assignment confirmation printouts were being left in participants’ charts, accessible to blinded personnel. As a corrective action taken in September, two months into trial recruitment and with around 1000 participants already enrolled, quality assurance checklists were updated with instructions for staff to remove drug assignments from charts.
BMJ confirmation of Pfizer data failings
The information basically shows how Pfizer have comprehensively faked, ignored, mismanaged & manipulated data in the clinical trials , and the whistleblower testimony, and the data which evidences her claims, fundamentally undermines the supposed successful trials of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine, it has again been artificially manipulated to seem more palatable as proof of their claims. The whistleblower from Pfizer, and the British Mdical Journal's confirmations of their data, have basically laid it out clearly - the basis for these mRNA vaccine efficacy reports is fraudulent - just like the Black Rock whistleblower in this thread has claimed is the case.
So now, we have Pfizer & Black Rock whistleblowers both saying that the basis of these vaccines is fraud perpetrated by Pfizer, and you can basically guarantee that the other companies producing vaccines almost certainly went off the same playbook. That's because this pandemic virus was a bioweapon released so that noxious poison could be delivered into the bodies of billions of people worldwide - they allowed the trials to be deliberately shoddy so they could conceal the toxic basis of what they were injecting.
All this so that the ultra-elites can euthanise us, while developing a cartelised world finance/economic system with a heavily reduced, controlled & influenced 'untouchable' population meekly operating as slaves to provide for their masters' luxurious lifestyles, and the improved lifestyle of the managers (politicians) in a world which has been 'reshaped' - yeah, reshaped by having less common humans to pollute their view of the landscape.
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
They don't require money in the same way we would conceive of someone needing money. They have funds of thousands of millions, total control over the economic system - they will depopulate in line with an upwards-cartelisation of the global corporate landscape, engineering it so smoothly that for years most people will barely notice wat's happening. A lot of people a lot smarter than me believe the same. And I refuse to believe that you're so wildly intelligent that you can counter all their very persuasive arguments.. They require a reduced population which can be used to provide for their lifestyles as masters of the earth.
They don't require money in the same way we would conceive of someone needing money. They have funds of thousands of millions, total control over the economic system - they will depopulate in line with an upwards-cartelisation of the global corporate landscape, engineering it so smoothly that for years most people will barely notice wat's happening. A lot of people a lot smarter than me believe the same. And I refuse to believe that you're so wildly intelligent that you can counter all their very persuasive arguments.. They require a reduced population which can be used to provide for their lifestyles as masters of the earth.
originally posted by: FlyInTheOintment
They don't require money in the same way we would conceive of someone needing money.
Right. When everyone is a trillionaire no one is. Think about that.
If you and your 100 neighbors all had the exact same amount of money on day 1 of the year someone is going to end up on top on day 365 due to market influences, personal ambitions and other factors.
You have a way too overly simplistic take on the economy.
They require a reduced population which can be used to provide for their lifestyles as masters of the earth.
What a total friggin oxymoronic statement. Do you even think about stuff like this before you type it?
edit on 2-2-2022 by AugustusMasonicus because: dey terk er election
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
Good morning.
I'm not your mod, and frankly inappreciative of your inability to stay on topic.
Is it a personal ambition, or includes other factors in which motivates such behavior?
Discuss the whistleblower if you intend to reply to me without causing further thread drift.
Thank you have a beneficent day.
🙏❤
Good morning.
Whistleblower from Blackrock exposes fraud & liability at highest levels Pfizer Moderna, etc..
If you and your 100 neighbors all had the exact same amount of money on day 1 of the year someone is going to end up on top on day 365 due to market influences, personal ambitions and other factors.
I'm not your mod, and frankly inappreciative of your inability to stay on topic.
Is it a personal ambition, or includes other factors in which motivates such behavior?
Discuss the whistleblower if you intend to reply to me without causing further thread drift.
Thank you have a beneficent day.
🙏❤
a reply to: loveguy
If you have a problem with the Original Poster and I discussing depopulation, which he brought up, report our conversation. Being that he is wrongly implying that companies like Blackrock and Pfizer somehow want less customers via killing them is 100% relevant.
If you have a problem with the Original Poster and I discussing depopulation, which he brought up, report our conversation. Being that he is wrongly implying that companies like Blackrock and Pfizer somehow want less customers via killing them is 100% relevant.
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
Look, what I think I'm trying to get at, yes accepting that my take on the economy IS too simplistic, because I'm not an economist, is to say that at the very pinnacle of world finance & administration, there are people so wealthy & powerful that even if they got out of all their investments & simply lived on the cash they had in their accounts afterwards, they would be masters of the universe for ten thousand years before they ever had to think of coming up with another investment strategy. These people literally float on air, they don't have to condescend to actually walk with their feet in the same muck we travel upon.
What I'm getting at, is that these people, totally in power over the rest of us, they have an ideological bent which requires them to mandate the killing off of hundreds of millions of people to preserve resources for themselves, and in a misguided sense 'for the future of the world'. It's a myth that the Earth is overpopulated - the only problem we have is the massive gap between the 1% and the rest of us. These people have a near-religious drive to reduce world populationn by hook or by crook. I think that the vaccines are being used as a deliberately staggered bioweapon - first there are hundreds of thousands of instant deaths, not enough that propaganda can't smother the story, as is the case at this moment in time. But later, we're likely to see massive increases in strokes, heart attacks, aneurisms, cancers & embolisms/ blood clots. That will take out hundreds of millions, potentially billions.
I reallly, really hope that I'm wrong. I'd love to be wrong. Life just took a positive turn for me & my family in our personal circumstances, but I have this nagging fear, after seeing all of the stuff that simply doesn't add up, that the world will be so irrevocably changed by the further outworskings of the pandemic & vaccine response, and the massive lockdown to quell riots when more & more people are dying in abnormally high numbers due directly to the vaccines being a toxic bioweapon which is administered to almost everyone on Earth - then the true 'reshaping' of the world will begin.
I hope I'm wrong, because I have a small tech business to develop, a separate dog breeding program with my wife taking charge there, and ultimately a charity to establish further down the road based on something really exciting which could be revolutionary if it works out right. So I really, really want to be wrong, because I have big plans & would love to be able to develop them fully. I just have a horrible feeling, looking at everything happening in the world today, that there won't be enough time for me to achieve those dreams if things carry on the way they are doing currently, and as they have in the past two years, because the world could literally break as a result of all of this pandemic/vaccine nonsense.
And you can't deny that the international agreement on lockdown policy has decimated the middle class, taking jobs away from working class folk too. It's heinous.
Look, what I think I'm trying to get at, yes accepting that my take on the economy IS too simplistic, because I'm not an economist, is to say that at the very pinnacle of world finance & administration, there are people so wealthy & powerful that even if they got out of all their investments & simply lived on the cash they had in their accounts afterwards, they would be masters of the universe for ten thousand years before they ever had to think of coming up with another investment strategy. These people literally float on air, they don't have to condescend to actually walk with their feet in the same muck we travel upon.
What I'm getting at, is that these people, totally in power over the rest of us, they have an ideological bent which requires them to mandate the killing off of hundreds of millions of people to preserve resources for themselves, and in a misguided sense 'for the future of the world'. It's a myth that the Earth is overpopulated - the only problem we have is the massive gap between the 1% and the rest of us. These people have a near-religious drive to reduce world populationn by hook or by crook. I think that the vaccines are being used as a deliberately staggered bioweapon - first there are hundreds of thousands of instant deaths, not enough that propaganda can't smother the story, as is the case at this moment in time. But later, we're likely to see massive increases in strokes, heart attacks, aneurisms, cancers & embolisms/ blood clots. That will take out hundreds of millions, potentially billions.
I reallly, really hope that I'm wrong. I'd love to be wrong. Life just took a positive turn for me & my family in our personal circumstances, but I have this nagging fear, after seeing all of the stuff that simply doesn't add up, that the world will be so irrevocably changed by the further outworskings of the pandemic & vaccine response, and the massive lockdown to quell riots when more & more people are dying in abnormally high numbers due directly to the vaccines being a toxic bioweapon which is administered to almost everyone on Earth - then the true 'reshaping' of the world will begin.
I hope I'm wrong, because I have a small tech business to develop, a separate dog breeding program with my wife taking charge there, and ultimately a charity to establish further down the road based on something really exciting which could be revolutionary if it works out right. So I really, really want to be wrong, because I have big plans & would love to be able to develop them fully. I just have a horrible feeling, looking at everything happening in the world today, that there won't be enough time for me to achieve those dreams if things carry on the way they are doing currently, and as they have in the past two years, because the world could literally break as a result of all of this pandemic/vaccine nonsense.
And you can't deny that the international agreement on lockdown policy has decimated the middle class, taking jobs away from working class folk too. It's heinous.
edit on FebruaryWednesday2202CST04America/Chicago-060034 by FlyInTheOintment because: editing presentation
originally posted by: FlyInTheOintment
Look, what I think I'm trying to get at, yes accepting that my take on the economy IS too simplistic, because I'm not an economist, is to say that at the very pinnacle of world finance & administration, there are people so wealthy & powerful that even if they got out of all their investments & simply lived on the cash they had in their accounts afterwards, they would be masters of the universe for ten thousand years before they ever had to think of coming up with another investment strategy.
And who do they 'master' if there's no one left but the 'elite'? Who does their laundry? Who cooks for them? Makes their clothes? On and on. What value is having a fortune when everyone has a fortune? That's inflation to the nth degree.
Money = power. The people that think they own the world have all the power. When they change how money works, whatever contrived universal exchange
mechanism is used to replace money as currency, they will still have the greater credit and the power it represents.
They will still be able to click their fingers, governments will still respond and do their bidding and the remnant will be grateful for the crumbs.
They, those that think they own the world, will still not be satisfied. They will never understand their own emptiness. They will never see how truly ugly they are.
The Blackrock/Pfiezer whistleblowers have done us all a great service but I have little hope it will make any difference to the ongoing onslaught on ordinary, natural people who do not crave such power.
They will still be able to click their fingers, governments will still respond and do their bidding and the remnant will be grateful for the crumbs.
They, those that think they own the world, will still not be satisfied. They will never understand their own emptiness. They will never see how truly ugly they are.
The Blackrock/Pfiezer whistleblowers have done us all a great service but I have little hope it will make any difference to the ongoing onslaught on ordinary, natural people who do not crave such power.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: FlyInTheOintment
Look, what I think I'm trying to get at, yes accepting that my take on the economy IS too simplistic, because I'm not an economist, is to say that at the very pinnacle of world finance & administration, there are people so wealthy & powerful that even if they got out of all their investments & simply lived on the cash they had in their accounts afterwards, they would be masters of the universe for ten thousand years before they ever had to think of coming up with another investment strategy.
And who do they 'master' if there's no one left but the 'elite'? Who does their laundry? Who cooks for them? Makes their clothes? On and on. What value is having a fortune when everyone has a fortune? That's inflation to the nth degree.
Why does it matter who?
Klaus Schwab.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
If you have a problem with the Original Poster and I discussing depopulation, which he brought up, report our conversation. Being that he is wrongly implying that companies like Blackrock and Pfizer somehow want less customers via killing them is 100% relevant.
Without getting into the depopulation argument like you are, it's fair for me to point out that if you are arguing against depopulation then your argument has a lot of holes out of the gate.
The "economics" become a whole different issue. Your straw-man conflates the two---whether disingenuously or from lack of intellectual rigor I can't tell.
Since I'm not arguing for or against the concept, I'ma leave it there.
a reply to: FlyInTheOintment
If insurance companies have seen a 40% rise in deaths how could they pay out and still remain solvent?
If insurance companies have seen a 40% rise in deaths how could they pay out and still remain solvent?
edit on 3-2-2022 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
Holes? The population is increasing, not decreasing, the only holes are in the heads of people who are ignoring the hard evidence of such.
As to the economics being incorrect I wasn't able to read your rebuttal since you didn't post one.
I'm not gonna take a lot to time for such a feeble argument in this now obscure corner of ATS. It's a time-management thing but we'll be having more better deeper discussions around the boards so there's that to look forward to.
A couple of points about your argument's holes:
Sounds to me like the argument for depopulation is that we are seeing the beginning. Thus, a one-dimensional proffering on current population appears weak and short-sighted.
Further, for some Club of Rome-type who's all in on climate change religion---they only need workers, servants, and sexual stock. Wealth & economics become relative. Everyone knows it's all about power anyway.
I seriously still don't know if you're being disingenuous or if you topped out on your ability for logic & persuasive argument. Like I said: See you around.
a reply to: FlyInTheOintment
I've been saying it for years, we are in a pharmaceutical industrial complex.
We know for a fact that various PTB have been tinkering with Spanish flu and so forth, even patenting these new strains. Now why patent these debilitating even deadly strains? Either it's security (ha!) Or money.
Cut off the head and the snake will die, we just need to find the head.
I've been saying it for years, we are in a pharmaceutical industrial complex.
We know for a fact that various PTB have been tinkering with Spanish flu and so forth, even patenting these new strains. Now why patent these debilitating even deadly strains? Either it's security (ha!) Or money.
Cut off the head and the snake will die, we just need to find the head.
originally posted by: FlyInTheOintment
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
They don't require money in the same way we would conceive of someone needing money. They have funds of thousands of millions, total control over the economic system - they will depopulate in line with an upwards-cartelisation of the global corporate landscape, engineering it so smoothly that for years most people will barely notice wat's happening. A lot of people a lot smarter than me believe the same. And I refuse to believe that you're so wildly intelligent that you can counter all their very persuasive arguments.. They require a reduced population which can be used to provide for their lifestyles as masters of the earth.
So, what you're saying is that the elite will take turns scrubbing each other's toilets and sewing each other's pants, after they've killed all of the people who would normally do that kind of thing.
Or maybe you're saying that the people who own all of the money will kill everyone else and then live in a cash free socialist paradise where money has no meaning?
a reply to: v1rtu0s0
It matters who because these would be the people who would not be subject to depopulation, owing to them having a place in the brave new world that you believe the elite are trying to usher in.
Finding out who these people are, or proving that they don't exist, could be used to verify or debunk any given conspiracy.
The whole idea of depopulation conspiracies tends to fall apart falls apart because 99% of them would create an unsustainable world that would be so unbalanced that it would collapse in on itself within a generation.
For example, most of them would end up killing the quietest, most economically productive people who have the smallest number of children. While leaving alive the least productive, least skilled, people who incidentally tend to have far larger families than everyone else.
It matters who because these would be the people who would not be subject to depopulation, owing to them having a place in the brave new world that you believe the elite are trying to usher in.
Finding out who these people are, or proving that they don't exist, could be used to verify or debunk any given conspiracy.
The whole idea of depopulation conspiracies tends to fall apart falls apart because 99% of them would create an unsustainable world that would be so unbalanced that it would collapse in on itself within a generation.
For example, most of them would end up killing the quietest, most economically productive people who have the smallest number of children. While leaving alive the least productive, least skilled, people who incidentally tend to have far larger families than everyone else.
new topics
-
Of course it was DEI
Dissecting Disinformation: 3 hours ago -
2nd Day Thanksgiving!...(leftovers!!)
General Chit Chat: 5 hours ago
top topics
-
New Disney Star Wars Films Failing Test of Time?
Movies: 17 hours ago, 5 flags -
Of course it was DEI
Dissecting Disinformation: 3 hours ago, 4 flags -
2nd Day Thanksgiving!...(leftovers!!)
General Chit Chat: 5 hours ago, 3 flags
active topics
-
Of course it was DEI
Dissecting Disinformation • 9 • : fringeofthefringe -
-@TH3WH17ERABB17- -Q- ---TIME TO SHOW THE WORLD--- -Part- --44--
Dissecting Disinformation • 3417 • : brewtiger123 -
2nd Day Thanksgiving!...(leftovers!!)
General Chit Chat • 6 • : DontTreadOnMe -
Mass UAP events. DC. Machester Airport, UFOs over sub base in CT, Nuke bases.
Aliens and UFOs • 25 • : rickymouse -
New Disney Star Wars Films Failing Test of Time?
Movies • 18 • : Popoll -
Unidentified Flying Objects Over U.S. Military Bases in Northeast UK, as of roughly 11 a.m. CST.
Aliens and UFOs • 32 • : Kangawoo2 -
The Party of Peace - Trump Cabinet Picks Targeted with Death Threats
US Political Madness • 51 • : RazorV66 -
Results of the use of the Oreshnik missile system in Dnepropetrovsk
World War Three • 263 • : DontTreadOnMe -
Anyone like the Scorpions?
Music • 23 • : Flyingclaydisk -
The Cost of True Discipleship—Count the Cost
Religion, Faith, And Theology • 5 • : alwaysbeenhere2