Universal vaccine could be the future of the coronavirus fight, Could Take Years to Make.

Wait a Universal vaccine could be the future of the coronavirus fight? but But such vaccines are "going to take years to develop? despite mRNA being rushed?

FDA/Pfizer are asking the court to delay the release of their vaccine data.

Universal vaccine could be the future of the coronavirus fight

But such vaccines are "going to take years to develop," Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said during a White House briefing on Wednesday.

Coronaviruses that infect humans were first identified in the mid-1960s, and there are seven known human coronaviruses: four that cause common colds; Middle East respiratory syndrome, or MERS; severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS; and SARS-CoV-2, the coronavirus that causes Covid-19.

They are still repeating the same message.

However, public health officials emphasize that it's still important to get vaccinated now

In the article are lying about the effectiveness.

Although those vaccines have shown effectiveness against infection and illness of around 90% and higher against the wild-type, that effectiveness against some SARS-CoV-2 variants has seen a small dip, dropping to 66% against Delta infections, for instance, and even lower for Omicron. But a third dose of the vaccine -- or a booster shot -- can improve protection against variants.

A 4th booster can improve protection against variants for how long? the article doesn't say.

Everytime TPTB open their mouths the resistance grows.

a reply to: vNex92

Liars.

Army already has it.

I am sure the big Pharma's will ensure it never sees the light of day.

US Army Creates Single Vaccine Against All COVID & SARS Variants, Researchers Say
www.defenseone.com...

Within weeks, scientists at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research expect to announce that they have developed a vaccine that is effective against COVID-19 and all its variants, even Omicron, as well as previous SARS-origin viruses that have killed millions of people worldwide.

The achievement is the result of almost two years of work on the virus. The Army lab received its first DNA sequencing of the COVID-19 virus in early 2020. Very early on, Walter Reed’s infectious diseases branch decided to focus on making a vaccine that would work against not just the existing strain but all of its potential variants as well.

Walter Reed’s Spike Ferritin Nanoparticle COVID-19 vaccine, or SpFN, completed animal trials earlier this year with positive results. Phase 1 of human trials, wrapped up this month, again with positive results that are undergoing final review, Dr. Kayvon Modjarrad, director of Walter Reed’s infectious diseases branch, said in an exclusive interview with Defense One on Tuesday. The new vaccine will still need to undergo phase 2 and phase 3 trials.

www.cnet.com...

How does the Army vaccine work against COVID-19 and other coronaviruses?
The vaccines from Moderna, Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson all target the specific virus -- SARS-CoV-2 -- that causes COVID-19. But Army scientists designed their vaccine to protect against future strains of COVID as well as other coronaviruses.

The Army's SpFN vaccine is shaped like a soccer ball with 24 faces. Scientists can attach the spikes of multiple coronavirus strains to each of the different faces, allowing them to customize the vaccine for any new COVID variants that arise.

"The accelerating emergence of human coronaviruses throughout the past two decades and the rise of SARS-CoV-2 variants, including most recently omicron, underscore the continued need for next-generation preemptive vaccines that confer broad protection against coronavirus diseases," Modjarrad said in a December statement. "Our strategy has been to develop a 'pan-coronavirus' vaccine technology that could potentially offer safe, effective and durable protection against multiple coronavirus strains and species.

No date has been set. SpFN successfully completed animal testing and wrapped Phase 1 of human trials in December, but it must still complete Phases 2 and 3 of human testing, when its safety and efficacy is compared to current vaccine options.

Normally, completing all three phases can take up to five years, but the urgency of the COVID-19 pandemic is speeding up the process. The Moderna, Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson vaccines, for example, were tested, reviewed and authorized by the Food and Drug Administration over the course of one year. "

www.wrair.army.mil...

a reply to: infolurker

Its no different from the mRNA.

Walter Reed’s Spike Ferritin Nanoparticle COVID-19 vaccine, or SpFN,

originally posted by: vNex92
a reply to: infolurker

Its no different from the mRNA.

Walter Reed’s Spike Ferritin Nanoparticle COVID-19 vaccine, or SpFN,

Care to elaborate ?

originally posted by: vNex92
a reply to: infolurker

Its no different from the mRNA.

Walter Reed’s Spike Ferritin Nanoparticle COVID-19 vaccine, or SpFN,

yeah it is.

It doesn't invade your cells and have them manufacture spike protein.

According to Defense One, which first reported the vaccine’s development, the vaccine uses entirely different technology to the Covid-19 shots currently in use around the world. Instead of the mRNA method or viral vectorvaccines, SpFN will use a soccer ball-shaped protein with 24 faces, each containing a different coronavirus spike protein.

According to Mr Modjarrad, “The repetitive and ordered display of the coronavirus spike protein on a multi-faced nanoparticle may stimulate immunity in such a way as to translate into significantly broader protection.”

Everytime they have tried to make vaccines against coronaviruses it has failed miserably, that is why they are targeting the spike protein to do this protection. Are they going to use the cherry picked safety data from this vaccine to show that the new vaccine is not unsafe? A common practice is to use another medicine that had bad effects to compare a new medicine to, focusing on the negative parts of the medicine that was found to be bad. They aren't required to test for any side effects that are unknown other than what is being required to be tested for.

Comparing things to the side effects of this vaccine will make any vaccine look great.

I wrote a thread on the flaws of such a vaccine back in early 2020:

There is no such thing as a safe universal flu vaccine

a reply to: infolurker

In that case i hope it will be released but like you said. I doubt they approve it.

Now with the new peer reviewed ivermectin study results showing how effective it is, why would we need any more vaccines? How they gonna argue their way out of this data I wonder.

originally posted by: rickymouse
Every time they have tried to make vaccines against coronaviruses it has failed

Simple baseline fact.
2d line.