Military Whistle Blower - 5 Year Cancer Average was 38,700 (2016-2020). In 2021 it's 114,645

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

The population is getting older. I have been fighting cancer (skin) myself. We have a larger older vet population so that may account for some of this.

Just keeping it real. . . .

Your not woke enough to keep it real, but cancer is real.
My wimmins got a tumuh (like Arnold would say) on her thyroid I hate cancer and hope you can keep your under control my friend. I couldn’t ats without you because you owe me a Chinese man birthed baby.

a reply to: Brotherman

I'm not going anywhere soon.

But yes, cancer does suck. I hope your lady is okay.

a reply to: DBCowboy

I was making a very large response to a member talking about hospitals and covid and where all the cancer people telling the story I went through, then I deleted the whole thing because my lady even said it’s not worth my effort.

Edit to add:
Where’s our baby homie I stocked up on scotch for the baby wtf

Cancer does suck. I lost my brother to it 2 years ago this week.

Men! Get your prostate checked as soon as recommended! The cancer can explode from there. Once it's spread not much you can do but suffer in pain.

Steering the immune system to search for one special thing can cause it to miss another disease, in this case cancer.

It is like truckers washing and waxing their trucks all the time to make the company look good, you can't deliver stuff if the trucker and truck are not doing what they were designed to do. A feeble attempt at putting this in layman's terms. I could have made the example about vacuuming up sawdust every time they cut a board building a house I suppose.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

The population is getting older. I have been fighting cancer (skin) myself. We have a larger older vet population so that may account for some of this.

Just keeping it real. . . .

That certainly explains the 3x increase in 1 year. Mystery solved.

originally posted by: rickymouse
Steering the immune system to search for one special thing can cause it to miss another disease, in this case cancer.

It is like truckers washing and waxing their trucks all the time to make the company look good, you can't deliver stuff if the trucker and truck are not doing what they were designed to do. A feeble attempt at putting this in layman's terms. I could have made the example about vacuuming up sawdust every time they cut a board building a house I suppose.

The mrna drugs cause a drop in NK cells which are the cells that patrol the body looking for cancerous and precancerous cells. This is 1 of 3 or 4 ways it can increase the chance of getting cancer.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

My personal observation,.... Dairy is the main culprit, the Oestrogen level are through the roof since they milk the cows all year round, combine that with growth hormone injections to increase milk yields, then concentrate it all in Cheese and the perfect storm is happening. The hormone in milk is the same growth hormone that is in humans which pushes a baby calf into a big Cow in a very few months. Do humans need it? the rise in cancers especially the ones fed by oestrogen, which respond to Oestrogen blockers, seems to be a no brainer. So you have a cancer cell, which just loves growth hormones and oestrogen, now a damaged immune system due to a poorly tested vaccine, and the storm will get bigger. The Casine in milk is also a contributor to high Blood Pressure, it must block the fine tubules in the kidneys, but disease makes mega bucks, hence never any action on simple diet.

My dad died of prostate cancer

It became sepsis and it was so sad. i don't wanna cry.

a reply to: frogs453

I thought this was among active duty?

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Why haven't we seen a 3-fold increase in deaths overall?

originally posted by: frogs453
Get your prostate checked as soon as recommended! The cancer can explode from there. Once it's spread not much you can do but suffer in pain.

You could drink laudanum for a week and get into it with a few gunslingers down at the local bar.

My sincere condolences for your loss.

Likely 20 years of war with DU munitions has shot the cancer rate up in a military db, not vaccines. If you have a civilian db that shows the same increase, then it is a consideration.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Why haven't we seen a 3-fold increase in deaths overall?

Why are you asking me? You already solved the mystery.

originally posted by: KorosStrohna
Likely 20 years of war with DU munitions has shot the cancer rate up in a military db, not vaccines. If you have a civilian db that shows the same increase, then it is a consideration.

True, that sort of thing just manifests all at once at the exact same time experimental drugs are forced on everyone in the service. Seems legit.

originally posted by: chris_stibrany
My dad died of prostate cancer

It became sepsis and it was so sad. i don't wanna cry.

a reply to: frogs453

So sorry for your loss. For my brother it spread to his hip, then other bones. He was in tremendous pain for his last year.

Your Dad is somewhere with no pain and happiness, whatever awaits us after death, of that I'm sure.

a reply to: Snarl

Thank you.
I'm a city girl, can't imagine myself getting into it with some gunslingers. Although I've been told I have a very smart mouth. Maybe I could!

originally posted by: Brotherman
a reply to: BigfootNZ

38,700 per average year Multiplied by 5 years = Appx. 193,500 (again over 5 years)
Versus
114,645 in (wait for it… wait for it…) 11 months

Not sure what your saying here unless I am looking at this 💩 wrong then by all means correct me

I was simply stating that you were comparing an average from 5 years with a single non averaged value from a single year. You have people in this thread (not you) seeing 38,700 and comparing it to 114,645 and going 'oh no its gotten so big! terrible!', one person in particular mentioned a 290% increase which is a wrong assumption to make entirely.

To get an Average you take all the values add em up then divide by the total number of values, so you'd take each years total for those 5 years add them up then divide all that by 5...

If you took the potential new 5 year average of the new values, ie the 114,645 in 2021 your comparing too and say the next 4 years it was hypothetically a low of 26,000, then 43,000, 36,000 then finally a large year of 61,000 you'd get a 5 year average of 56,129... which is a MUCH closer number to 38,700 than 114,645 is and a much less scary increase

Im simply stating that comparing an average with a non average is conflating the differences to cause sensation where there shouldnt be. You also have to take into account that while your reversing of the average comes to 193,500 as the total over those 5 years, that DOESNT mean the yearly numbers where all 38,700 or even any year was 38,700 at all, one year in that time frame could have been twice easily that number just as much as one of those years it could have been half the average, hell those other 4 years could have been 1 case per year and the yearly average would STILL be 38,700 (though that is pretty much impossible probability wise lol but hey # happens).

A large single year value is NOT a sign of something going wrong since next year the cancer rates could be lower than the average of the previous 5 years, but hey the year after it could jump even HIGHER than 114,645...

Hence my statement of lets wait for the next 4 years numbers before we make any conclusion as to an increase in the 5 year averages which is what the OP's post was intimating... lets compare apples to apples, not apples to oranges.

I just wish we could get the exact yearly numbers for each year in that 2016-2020 period, who knows one year might have had a significant number compared to the rest... I tried finding the information but my Googlefu isnt that good.

originally posted by: BigfootNZ

originally posted by: Brotherman
a reply to: BigfootNZ

38,700 per average year Multiplied by 5 years = Appx. 193,500 (again over 5 years)
Versus
114,645 in (wait for it… wait for it…) 11 months

Not sure what your saying here unless I am looking at this 💩 wrong then by all means correct me

I was simply stating that you were comparing an average from 5 years with a single non averaged value from a single year. You have people in this thread (not you) seeing 38,700 and comparing it to 114,645 and going 'oh no its gotten so big! terrible!', one person in particular mentioned a 290% increase which is a wrong assumption to make entirely.

To get an Average you take all the values add em up then divide by the total number of values, so you'd take each years total for those 5 years add them up then divide all that by 5...

If you took the potential new 5 year average of the new values, ie the 114,645 in 2021 your comparing too and say the next 4 years it was hypothetically a low of 26,000, then 43,000, 36,000 then finally a large year of 61,000 you'd get a 5 year average of 56,129... which is a MUCH closer number to 38,700 than 114,645 is and a much less scary increase

Im simply stating that comparing an average with a non average is conflating the differences to cause sensation where there shouldnt be. You also have to take into account that while your reversing of the average comes to 193,500 as the total over those 5 years, that DOESNT mean the yearly numbers where all 38,700 or even any year was 38,700 at all, one year in that time frame could have been twice easily that number just as much as one of those years it could have been half the average, hell those other 4 years could have been 1 case per year and the yearly average would STILL be 38,700 (though that is pretty much impossible probability wise lol but hey # happens).

A large single year value is NOT a sign of something going wrong since next year the cancer rates could be lower than the average of the previous 5 years, but hey the year after it could jump even HIGHER than 114,645...

Hence my statement of lets wait for the next 4 years numbers before we make any conclusion as to an increase in the 5 year averages which is what the OP's post was intimating... lets compare apples to apples, not apples to oranges.

I just wish we could get the exact yearly numbers for each year in that 2016-2020 period, who knows one year might have had a significant number compared to the rest... I tried finding the information but my Googlefu isnt that good.

Yeah, no.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
The evidence continues to pour in that the Covid mRNA drugs are some of the most toxic drugs ever produced. Attorney Thomas Renz has shared the details from the military's DMED system also known as the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database regarding the cancer rates in the military. Unlike VAERs this system is indisputably accurate. It shows the average rate increased by nearly 300% in 2021, which coincides with the vaccine roll out.

This of course was predicted by Dr. Ryan Cole:

“Since January 1, in the laboratory, I’m seeing a 20 times increase of endometrial cancers over what I see on an annual basis,” reported Dr. Cole in the video clip shared on Twitter.

Dr. Cole states in his video that, not only are melanomas showing up more frequently, like endometrial cancers, the melanomas are also developing more rapidly, and are more severe in younger people, than he has ever previously witnessed.

“Most concerning of all, there is a pattern of these types of immune cells in the body keeping cancer in check,” stated the doctor.

“I’m seeing invasive melanomas in younger patients; normally we catch those early, and they are thin melanomas, [but] I’m seeing thick melanomas skyrocketing in the last month or two,” he added.

Cole explained that two types of cells are required for adequate immune system function: “Helper T-cells,” also called “CD4 cells,” and “killer T-cells,” often known as “CD8 cells.”

According to Cole, in patients with HIV, there is a massive suppression of “helper T-cells” which cause immune system functions to plummet, and leave the patient susceptible to a variety of illnesses.

Similarly, Cole describes, “post-vaccine, what we are seeing is a drop in your killer T-cells, in your CD8 cells,”

“And what do CD8 cells do? They keep all other viruses in check,” he continued.

Much like HIV causes immune system disruption by suppressing CD4 “helper” cells, the same thing happens when CD8 “killer” cells are suppressed. In Dr. Cole’s expert view, this is what seems to be the case with the COVID-19 jabs.

Cole goes on to state that as a result of this vaccine-induced “killer T-cell” suppression, he is seeing an “uptick” of not only endometrial cancer, but also melanomas, as well as herpes, shingles, mono, and a “huge uptick” in HPV when “looking at the cervical biopsies of women.”

SOURCE

Further Reading

Don't know where to start with this nonsense...

For a start, "Dr" Ryan Cole has been widely discredited by medcial professionals in Idaho and in america in general, and I would suggest gloabally... He has been wrong many times before... How is this any different?

He owns how own research lab, so has a horse in the race so to speak..

Second, he is not linked to the military in any way, and your sources do not link to the data from the military, so where are you getting this information from?

Thirdly, hospitals are not agreeing with this trend, or it owuld be all over the news...

You recent posts have been a bit of a Joke mate...

Try checking your dubious sources before posting... you're becoming a bit of a laughing stock on ATS...

PA