The Infamous Pfizer Batch EN6201 - 1 in 33 Chance of Death

We already know the covid-19 mRNA drugs are the most dangerous "vaccines" in human history by a long shot.

EN6201 is the most toxic of the highly toxic 0.5% batches that Pfizer produced in the United States based on the overall death count.

According to VAERs and howbad.info we can see this batch is responsible for at least 111 deaths and over 2800 serious adverse effects. Most batches contain about 100-150 thousand doses, so even before we multiple by our under reporting factor we are still looking at a 1 in 1,351 odds of death from this batch. I don't know about you, but I feel pretty uncomfortable with these odds and I think most people are looking for a much lower probability of death.

It's even worse than that once we use an under reporting factor of 41 to multiply. There are multiple studies that show that VAERs is under reported, but I'm using Steve Kirsch's engineering estimate. 111 times 41 is 4551. Using a conservative estimate of 150,000 for batch size, we divide and are left with approximately 33. That means our estimate shows this batch killed 1 in 33 people who got the vaccine. That doesn't even count the adverse effects, which comes out to more than 2 in every 3 people.

5% of batches are responsible for 95% of deaths. Infact, the "quality control" is so bad, there's no way this is by coincidence. In contrast, the flu vaccine kills 0, or 1 person per batch, across all batch numbers, and this can seen consistently for decades. No other vaccine has this "quality control" issue.

According to a recent estimate by Steve Kirsch, at least 388,000 have died from the covid vaccines in the United States. This is inline with the 40% increase in all cause mortality seen by some life insurance companies. They note that this increase is not caused by Covid deaths.

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Hum, if I requested it for a "friend" would it be murder?
Sounds like pretty much the odds for any poison I might give someone.

I'm sure Fauci has a speech to counter this data.
Is this the greatest false flag perpetrated on the entire world, or what?
All I can do when reading the latest information as it comes out is shake my head. It's to the point of being surreal.

Are the batches in the graph image, sorted chronologically?

I'm trying to figure out if this is getting safer... ?

Are they actually trying to improve the situation, or is it still random luck on whether or not you get a bad batch booster?

originally posted by: nugget1
I'm sure Fauci has a speech to counter this data.
Is this the greatest false flag perpetrated on the entire world, or what?
All I can do when reading the latest information as it comes out is shake my head. It's to the point of being surreal.

Oh it’s not a false flag, it’s a real, premeditated and calculated attack on the people of the world.
They knew exactly what they were doing.

Still can't sue 'em.
Tough toenails, dead vaxxer families.

Yea?
What ya gonna do aboot it eh?

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

EN6201

My eyes read that as event 201, weird.

OK back to reading Op
🙏❤

Maybe it's the serum they use to base the exercise on? Ongoing?
Pompeo said it was a live exercise in the first weeks of the scare tactics application.
He hasn't come out and said the live exercise is concluded yet, so don't give them anymore leverage with a positive test....a test that for the past 24 months manipulated for desired effect.....manufacturing an ongoing crisis that would not be a crisis if having not followed 201 protocol?

Beneficence!
🙏❤

This

originally posted by: loveguy
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

EN6201

My eyes read that as event 201, weird.

OK back to reading Op
🙏❤

Maybe it's the serum they use to base the exercise on? Ongoing?
Pompeo said it was a live exercise in the first weeks of the scare tactics application.
He hasn't come out and said the live exercise is concluded yet, so don't give them anymore leverage with a positive test....a test that for the past 24 months manipulated for desired effect.....manufacturing an ongoing crisis that would not be a crisis if having not followed 201 protocol?

Beneficence!
🙏❤

201 disclaimer

 Instead, the exercise served to highlight preparedness and response challenges that would likely arise in a very severe pandemic. We are not now predicting that the nCoV-2019 outbreak will kill 65 million people. Although our tabletop exercise included a mock novel coronavirus, the inputs we used for modeling the potential impact of that fictional virus are not similar to nCoV-2019.

I haven't compared their exercise with real world actions.....
Problems with variants not addressed in exercise relies on integrity.

They don't give any details as plan of action timeline, just conclude 65million as a ballpark figure?

Have fun trying to post a link, I had to add spaces to send it to someone.

Well let's hope nine of these batch numbers are given at vaccine clinic in schools, cos now in Aotearoa New Zealand 5year olds can now give their own consent to be jabbed with out their parents permission. Sorry I can't give the link, but it was in our national newspaper

a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Ok. My family. 59 yrs, 69 yrs, 86 yrs, 96 yr olds. All of us.

All Pfizer's and booster. What's that make my odds???

originally posted by: PillarOfFire

This

Fauci is the greatest mass murderer in EARTH history, Nazi Dr. Megele was just a piker by comparison.

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Ok. My family. 59 yrs, 69 yrs, 86 yrs, 96 yr olds. All of us.

All Pfizer's and booster. What's that make my odds???

It's Russian roulette, literally.

originally posted by: Cloudbuster
Well let's hope nine of these batch numbers are given at vaccine clinic in schools, cos now in Aotearoa New Zealand 5year olds can now give their own consent to be jabbed with out their parents permission. Sorry I can't give the link, but it was in our national newspaper

convo

Are children competent to consent?

When it comes to the Care of Children Act, the view of the New Zealand courts follows a British case in which the House of Lords decided a child under 16 was legally competent to consent to medical examination and treatment — if they had sufficient maturity and intelligence to understand the nature and implications of that treatment.

Similarly, under the New Zealand code, if a health professional is satisfied the young person fully understands what is involved with the treatment, then the young person can consent.

The jab leads to increased hospital visits where majority don't go home with a clean bill of health, and they die to take one for the team.

When it comes to consenting to vaccination, a health professional must be satisfied the child understands why it is necessary and the reasons for it. They must also be satisfied the child understands the risks, benefits and outcomes involved.

Equally, everyone can refuse medical treatment under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, including children.

However, the courts have also decided this applies only to those who are competent and who fully understand what is involved in making the decision.

The courts only tend to override the views of the child in serious, usually life-threatening, situations.

I personally can't grasp not putting my foot down by now!
bob
🙏❤

originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: v1rtu0s0

Ok. My family. 59 yrs, 69 yrs, 86 yrs, 96 yr olds. All of us.

All Pfizer's and booster. What's that make my odds???

You can look up your batch here:

www.howbad.info...

and here:

www.howbad.info...

If you don't find it, go to the root site, www.howbad.info... and check the other links for outside of the US.