Doctor suspended over COVID vaccine views plans to sue Hospital .

Link




First I'd like to point out the surprisingly objective reporting by the News Station on this story ,There was no spinning or Ideal pushing just straight facts and I find that very refreshing .

Doctor Mary Bowden is an ear, nose and throat specialist. She runs her own private practice, BreatheMD, but had recently joined the staff at Houston Methodist. The doctor, who claims she has treated more than 2,000 patients with COVID-19, said she had a great relationship with Methodist until they disagreed with some of her social media posts regarding vaccine mandates and treatments.

“The issues with vaccines and ivermectin really go against patient autonomy and their right to choose their treatment,” Dr. Bowden said.

Doctors have been silenced for to long now and the pot is boiling over , Doctors have an obligation to give there patients the ' BEST CARE AVAILABLE ' and that is what this brave MD is doing . How long did the NIH and CDC really think it would be before regular MD's figured out that Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine really are effective treatments ? These drugs save lives and Working Class Doctors dont give a damn what the Media thinks , I applaud this woman.

a reply to: asabuvsobelow

This was wrong on many levels. I hope the doctor succeeds on her right to sue the hospital.

a reply to: asabuvsobelow

Kudos to this doctor for going against the scamdemic narrative.
If the drugs work, give them to the patients.
I hope she takes the hospital to the cleaners.

ITs the only way to even the playing field.
Hope she wins big.

Yea!

About damn time, really.
Maybe this will help other doctors grow a spine?

How many other cures have been disregarded?

Ill bet Ivermectin works on the regular flu and they have known for years, But didnt let it out so they could get the flu vax.

Yeah, telling the truth can get a person in trouble unless media says it is true.

www.yahoo.com...

When I got Covid in September, I had a bunch of unpleasant symptoms, some of which led me to go into the ER to make sure something serious wasn't going on. By that point I could barely speak, had bad pneumonia, and when they checked my blood oxygen level, it measured at 84% which is considered an emergency and apparently low enough to cause brain damage.
They immediately admitted me and gave me a huge dose of Remdesivir. My symptoms completely disappeared and I had no side effects.

There are treatment options that work. Remdesivir is one of them. The Big Pharma mRNA vaccine manufacturers (Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson) don't want them being used, because then they'll have less of an ability to scare people into getting vaccinated, which means less money in their pockets.
Let me add a little perspective here: The mRNA vaccines Pfizer sold during 2021 raked in about $14.6 billion for them. Do you think a bunch of execs sitting in their corporate meeting room are going to decide to throw out billions of dollars a year in profit? They're literally making enough from their vaccines to buy political decisions and media coverage.

originally posted by: nfflhome
ITs the only way to even the playing field.
Hope she wins big.

Not only that, I hope more follow . There has been criminal levels of silencing opposing thoughts and suppressing treatments that work

The Approved Dose of Ivermectin Alone is not the Ideal Dose for the Treatment of COVID-19 (Pubmed)

And also not 10 times that approved dose (which would be a considerable overdose, not healthy, and not prescribed by those doctors prescribing ivermectin to their patients for that very reason). And "not ideal" = no antiviral effect whatsoever (the other suggested effects are not well researched and show all the hallmarks of being completely imaginary, at normal therapeutic dosages; for starters, because they are proposed by the same people who spread* misleading information about ivermectin's supposed antiviral effects at therapeutic dosages, rather than 30 times more than that. *: inadvertently or otherwise, those who published the paper concerning the in vitro study the paper above is responding to, did it deliberately. Apparently they think that the phenomenon of 'publish or perish' justifies all sorts of dishonest behaviour when publishing papers about the potential efficacy of drugs, cause it's standard modus operandi in that field to use unrealistically high concentrations of a drug to get any effect at all, then hype it and pretend it warrants further investigation and in vivo studies, while they are fully aware that at concentrations that are realistically achievable in vivo, there's no efficacy at all, that's why they upped the concentrations in the first place. Then conveniently talk past the fact that these concentrations cannot be achieved in vivo with anything near the usual dosages for that drug, and that trying to achieve those concentrations in vivo, would result in very unhealthy effects for the patient.)

However, HCQ works great, real case studies from a competent doctor and professor of nutrician who cares more about the patients than his fame and fortune, or career (note how many days of fever some of these patients have had before receiving his treatment protocol, with no sign of improvement, and how fast the fever is gone after the 1st day of treatment; in case you want to attribute this improvement to the normal operation of the immune system, as someone might do when thinking about those patients who improved on ivermectin, thinking the argument applies in both cases, both for those patients that have shown improvement after taking HCQ or after ivermectin. The argument only counts for 1 of the 2, if you take the article at the start of my comment seriously, you'll know which one. Also don't forget, that the doctor in the video in the OP, likely uses other substances for her patients to help with recovery, such as vitamin C and D3, which are of limited benefit):



Context (playlist)

They took a Hippocratic Oath, not an oath of subservience to profit, power, and Big Pharma.

a reply to: RazorV66

The media doesn't say what is true or not unless the power structure tells them it's okay.

a reply to: rickymouse

Agreed, complete violation of laws, ethics, patient rights.

a reply to: ancientlight

Unless I break a limb or am brought in due to significant physical trauma. I'll be hard pressed to bring myself to want to even get close to a hospital. Or my doctors office for that matter.

There has been a complete loss of trust in my part for the medical profession. They don't have your best interests at heart whatsoever.

originally posted by: canuckster
Unless I break a limb or am brought in due to significant physical trauma. I'll be hard pressed to bring myself to want to even get close to a hospital. Or my doctors office for that matter.

There has been a complete loss of trust in my part for the medical profession. They don't have your best interests at heart whatsoever.

I was talking to a group of friends on Sunday. All six of us where talking about the gifts of old age, and were comparing maladies. A favorite topic with us old folk.

Of course the usually response when someone complains of an ailment is, "What did you doctor say?"

We all laughed when we all admitted that we had not seen a doctor, or talked to a doctor, and would likely die before going to a hospital. So it looks like this is becoming a common choice for many of us senior citizens.

The healthcare system and CDC has lost trust. Once you lose it, it doesn't come back.

originally posted by: trollz
When I got Covid in September, I had a bunch of unpleasant symptoms, some of which led me to go into the ER to make sure something serious wasn't going on. By that point I could barely speak, had bad pneumonia, and when they checked my blood oxygen level, it measured at 84% which is considered an emergency and apparently low enough to cause brain damage.
They immediately admitted me and gave me a huge dose of Remdesivir. My symptoms completely disappeared and I had no side effects.

There are treatment options that work. Remdesivir is one of them. The Big Pharma mRNA vaccine manufacturers (Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson) don't want them being used, because then they'll have less of an ability to scare people into getting vaccinated, which means less money in their pockets.
Let me add a little perspective here: The mRNA vaccines Pfizer sold during 2021 raked in about $14.6 billion for them. Do you think a bunch of execs sitting in their corporate meeting room are going to decide to throw out billions of dollars a year in profit? They're literally making enough from their vaccines to buy political decisions and media coverage.

Be thankful that you had no side effects, because one of them with Remdesivir is shutting down your kidneys. It also costs about $2300 dollars for the 5 day treatment, as opposed to about $20 for a course of ivermectin with no major side effects.

India and Japan both used ivermectin to wipe out an outbreak. Crickets from the media.

a reply to: trollz

They immediately admitted me and gave me a huge dose of Remdesivir. My symptoms completely disappeared and I had no side effects.

The problem here isn't whether or not things like "Remdesivir" are effective against covid, it's the fact that they are only of any real use once you're already infected, and even then are only really of any use if your seriously sick.

The whole reason that they are being downplayed in favor of the vax is that the vast majority of vaxxed people never get sick enough to need Remdesivir in the first place.

Prevention is always preferential, and it's much more cost effective as well.

Imagine if you'd been double vaxxed and simply gotten a mild cold.

originally posted by: TheAiIsLying

originally posted by: trollz
When I got Covid in September, I had a bunch of unpleasant symptoms, some of which led me to go into the ER to make sure something serious wasn't going on. By that point I could barely speak, had bad pneumonia, and when they checked my blood oxygen level, it measured at 84% which is considered an emergency and apparently low enough to cause brain damage.
They immediately admitted me and gave me a huge dose of Remdesivir. My symptoms completely disappeared and I had no side effects.

There are treatment options that work. Remdesivir is one of them. The Big Pharma mRNA vaccine manufacturers (Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson) don't want them being used, because then they'll have less of an ability to scare people into getting vaccinated, which means less money in their pockets.
Let me add a little perspective here: The mRNA vaccines Pfizer sold during 2021 raked in about $14.6 billion for them. Do you think a bunch of execs sitting in their corporate meeting room are going to decide to throw out billions of dollars a year in profit? They're literally making enough from their vaccines to buy political decisions and media coverage.

Be thankful that you had no side effects, because one of them with Remdesivir is shutting down your kidneys. It also costs about $2300 dollars for the 5 day treatment, as opposed to about $20 for a course of ivermectin with no major side effects.

India and Japan both used ivermectin to wipe out an outbreak. Crickets from the media.

India stopped using it once it was shown to have almost no effect. Japan never actually used it beyond trials Source