It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Bold ass statement there... None around the whole world? Even your local hospital is lying...geez get real..
originally posted by: TheRedneck
I am being real. That's what happens when one skews data for so long in so many ways.
Yes, my local hospital is skewing data as well.
As for the stats you posted as an example, they are incomplete. Define "vaccinated." One shot? Two? How many boosters? How long ago? What are the patients in the hospital for?
That's an old, old trick... generalize the data so relevance is generalized out of it, then interpret it the way one wishes. People will invariably fall for it, too... you did.
TheRedneck
The problem is the Goverment makes absolute statement in a very variable environment and a week later they are incorrect.
England has basically done away with all mandates, masks, isolation, school closers etc. in one speech. That is what we need to do. Embrace omicrom as a good thing and move on
As to boosters, most likely forever, but that doesn't mean everyone needs one or should even get one. It has always been about the old and high risk and that is where it needs to stay.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
The problem is the Goverment makes absolute statement in a very variable environment and a week later they are incorrect.
That is a large part of the problem, yes. The reason behind that reason, however, seems to me to be that applicable data has been ignored since the beginning of 2020. Trump was placed under pressure to minimize the cost of the illness on the population, so he made a mistake and agreed for the Federal government to shoulder that burden for the uninsured. That gave hospitals great incentive to get doctors to list "COVID-19" as the cause of death wherever they could, successfully skewing the death rate.
Of course, the higher the death rate the more serious the virus looked to the public, and the worse things became for Trump. As a result of that political maneuver, all of the data up to this point (and continuing) is skewed and unreliable. artificially shifted toward making the virus seem worse than what it really is. Yes, it can be serious and life-threatening, but not in the numbers we have been given (and even those numbers do not justify the mass hysteria we have been forced to deal with).
If one really wants to see where the political blame for this fiasco lies, look no farther than Andrew Cuomo, a mass-murderer who murdered a large number of elderly citizens in cold blood by forcing them into nursing homes while infected (along with several other governors as well: New Jersey and Michigan to name a couple). Look to Nancy Pelosi, who early on tried to spread the virus as much as possible by encouraging people to visit areas which were likely to become infected. To a lesser degree, look to almost every US governor who implemented face mask mandates and economic lockdowns (both parties; I will be voting against Kay Ivey (R-AL) for governor this year), all of which actually contributed to the spread. As far as I can tell, only one state, South Dakota, refused to give into mandates and lockdowns... my hat is off to their governor.
Still, I expect nothing to really change significantly in 2022, and I expect Joe Biden to win again in 2024. The people are no longer in control of their national elections. Now our government tells us who will run our government instead of us telling our government. Many have not seen this yet, but they will... after sufficient power has been consolidated to make such knowledge safe for those in office.
I don't think I would characterize it as "embracing Omicron," although I think I do understand your meaning. I accept Omicron as a normal (more infectious, less dangerous) variant of the original virus, and certainly as a method by which herd immunity might be achieved. My characterization would be more like "accept Omicron," as in, the way we accept that the common cold exists. I'm sure somewhere, someone will pass due to Omicron (if someone hasn't already; I have not heard of any confirmed Omicron deaths, but there may be some) and no death should be embraced.
And yes, I know you did not intend that statement as embracing death... it could be turned that way, however, if one
As to boosters, most likely forever, but that doesn't mean everyone needs one or should even get one. It has always been about the old and high risk and that is where it needs to stay.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: PapagiorgioCZ
Covid does not change taste/smell with the Omicron variant. Sounds like you maybe had Delta.
www.newsnationnow.com...
One study released by the U.K. Health Security Agency Friday found that loss of smell or taste occurred in about 13% of omicron cases tracked by the country’s National Health Service.