It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by skippytjcDETROIT (Reuters) - General Motors Corp. Wednesday said it signed an $88 million deal with the Department of Energy to build a fleet of 40 hydrogen fuel cell vehicles and further develop the technology..."
Once oil demand is reduced to almost nothing, so will the middle east...
Originally posted by Nygdan
Originally posted by skippytjcDETROIT (Reuters) - General Motors Corp. Wednesday said it signed an $88 million deal with the Department of Energy to build a fleet of 40 hydrogen fuel cell vehicles and further develop the technology..."
This has actually been going on for quite some time.
Once oil demand is reduced to almost nothing, so will the middle east...
The arabian penninsula certainly, but not iraq iran of the med coast countries. Oil is also still more effective than hydrogen cells. But it is interesting to ponder. What will happen to the arabian penninsula if the world economy abandons oil completely? I doubt it will return to the pre-kingdom type existence, at least not too quickly.
However, there is more likelyhood that the west can switch to a non-oil economy while the developing countries stick with oil. This will be interesting, because it will mean that countries like saudi arabia and other middle eastern oil countries will be more powerful and more affluent than their customers, the reverse of what it is now. Imagine an expanded Saudi arabia that includes parts of the horn of africa and the like.
Originally posted by sigung86
I've done a bit of topical reading and do not have a link for it, but I was reading somewhere that there is some evidence to indicate that the oil is renewing itself. That oil may not be a biological entity (left over squished dinosaurs), but something that renews itself deep in the bowels of the earth where pressure and heat interacts with minerals, etc. Boy! That would be neat.
(Progress? like indefinite growth - or - best use of available resources? to be squandered by your children and their broken toys
Originally posted by edsinger
And what if it is all a scare by the envirowacko's?
Technology and progress will not be stopped.
Originally posted by skippytjc
Thats one point, but dont you think the US would use any new alternate energy tech to gain power in those very countries?
The US uses the massive majority of the oil in the world, that alone could cripple the middle east.
Add then all the other countries to US sells/gives this tech to and that seals it.
Arab nations that depend on oil exports need to get in line. Because the world isnt going to need them much longer.
Originally posted by DEEZNUTZ
I think Canada will become the new Middle East in terms of Oil production and export. We have the Alberta oil Sand's that have a projected 300 billion barrels of recoverable oil and perhaps another 1.5 - 2 trillion barrels that would be harder to extract but doable.
Link for Alberta Oil Sands www.growley.com...
Originally posted by edsinger
One thing else no one has mentioned that I think should be taken into account,
liquefied Coal.
The United States has PLENTY of coal, we have the technological base to make it happen.....IF and only IF we really wanted to.
I had once thought that the strategic reserves were 'strategic' in the sense that they'd be used incase of an embargo and the military needed to mobilize. Not true at all. The reserve exists soley to reduce the price of gasoline and oil.
Originally posted by ShadowXIX
negativenihil im not saying we should use it but if we found our selves in a major energy crisis that was costing people their lives I could live with it. If it comes down to people not lasting through the winter or not living to 90 Im all for coal.
Originally posted by Seekerof
Implimentation of hydrogen in vehicles is coming and coming in a hurry. Once this happens, though it will not entirely take the US off oil dependency, it will cut that factor. Economic stability will steadily improve without the fear of oil prices, etc.
Give it 3-5 years....
www.msnbc.msn.com...
If you can’t wait five, 10 or 20 years for the much-touted "hydrogen economy," then step right up: Several companies are ready to sell you vehicles that run on the fuel that's much cleaner and gets higher mileage than gasoline or diesel.
Like sports cars? There's a Shelby Cobra with a 351 engine that runs on hydrogen. How about a Nissan Frontier pickup powered by fuel cells and hydrogen? That will soon be available. Or hankering for a hydrogen Hummer? That, too, can be yours.
There are two significant catches, however. First is getting the hydrogen. Industrial gas suppliers sell hydrogen in cylinders but very few filling stations exist today. California has the most at 13 pilotstations run by utilities and carmakers, and plans some 170 commercial ones by 2010. The cost varies too, from $1 to $20 a kilo. A gallon of gasoline has the same energy content as a kilo of hydrogen, but vehicles using the latter get two to three times higher mileage.
Second is the price tag: The Shelby Cobras start at $149,000, the pickup is $99,995 and the Hummers run $60,000 for the conversion alone — you supply the Hummer.
Originally posted by Rasputin13
Actually, the reserves are for national emergencies and/or times of war. They are not intended to be used to reduce the price of oil/gas, as was done by Bill Clinton prior to the 2000 election in an effort to lower prices and give Al Gore's campaign a boost.
negativnihil
Nuclear Power on the other hand, is a worthy investment. I do feel that with enough research we could safely use it.