It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Justoneman
Don't be lazy and ask me to prove what has already been proven about the jabs and death rates world wide.
I think he's lookin for a peer-reviewed study, not an ATS study
originally posted by: Quadrivium
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Justoneman
Don't be lazy and ask me to prove what has already been proven about the jabs and death rates world wide.
I think he's lookin for a peer-reviewed study, not an ATS study
Peer reviewed by whom?
They blackballed anyone and everyone who had one negative thing to say about the vax/boosters. They smeared them in the media as "conspiracy theorist" and refuse to even look at the evidence they present.
As of now 'science has been brought to you by Big Pharma'.
Quad
originally posted by: Justoneman
Duh!
originally posted by: Justoneman
I know what I am doing and why.
originally posted by: Justoneman
You guys are just out following some feelz good stuff and not paying attention to the details.
originally posted by: Justoneman
There have been lots of discussions of those links on many threads here.
originally posted by: Justoneman
Being lazy is a forte of the leftist and the shills.
originally posted by: Justoneman
I have done enough carrying the water with people who don't care what the truth is.
originally posted by: Justoneman
If they want to know it they can find out anything and it is likely discussed on ATS ad nauseum. True?
originally posted by: Quadrivium
Peer reviewed by whom?
originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: FlyInTheOintment
I see it a little differently. I think what we are seeing is the gradual realization that these evil bastages didn't think there would be the collective resistance to the "vaccine" that there is. They imagined that by now there wouldn't be enough unvaccinated people to amount to a "voice". Now that they see there is (enough people), and that they've resisted long enough to have the negative effects of the "vaccine" start showing up they realize they are on very dangerous ground. They had hoped that by now they could have already begun the (I don't know what to call it)...the 'justification crusade', saying 'we're all in this mess together (i.e. dying from a bad "vaccine"), but there's nothing that can be done about it'. They were counting on there not being enough people resisting to stand up and say..."WE TOLD YOU GREEDY, EVIL, BASTAGES WHAT WAS GOING TO HAPPEN, AND NOW LOOK WHAT'S HAPPENING!!"
They didn't count on that, and now they have nowhere to hide. They can no longer hide behind a wall of BULL# and political rhetoric! They're going to be called out for who they really are...and they know it!!
Bottom line...these people are SCARED!! And they damn well should be!!
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: putnam6
Well IF they have been truthful about being vaxed and boosted the MSM problem will most likely sort itself out if the complications occur.
Either way, its going to suck even more to be in health care in the coming years I think, I am inclined to believe unintended consequences from the vaccine are coming and that is going to dmg health care far more than the virus did.
You are so kind to say these were "unintended consequences'. It appears to be intentional on almost every part of the faux media arena. There may be a few who don't know the plan so they can say things with a straight face. We can see those as opposed to AOC and the Piglosi Dem's and RINO's who are just plain liars. They lie so much it is smarter to assume they lie when their lips are moving so you can check that data off as bogus on the spot.
originally posted by: atlantiswatusi
a reply to: Justoneman
I'll tell you what---you link the research that shows the vaccine is actually killing people.
I doubt it even exists. But then if you do find something ask yourself first.....have you forgotten that correlation does not equal causation?
How could such information be assembled in any honest sense? With any degree of scientific integrity?
To further put this into perspective---the Coronavirus---and studies into the possibility of a bat caused outbreak---have existed in searchable documents for over a decade. So just using old science based logic---the study on a vaccination should be understood. Decades of studies into vaccinations also helps give blueprints.
I have stated from the beginning---this is a fantastic cash grab for the industry still dealing with the implications into their applications of opioids in medicine. And as it turns out---a fantastic cash and power grab by politicians.
Someone actually posted on here it will become like the Walking Dead. The level of doom porn wishfullness is perplexing at best.
originally posted by: Acknt
a reply to: FlyInTheOintment
Context to The World Health Organizations statement is important. Following that quote yhey say that boosters should be variant specific, and are pushing for an omicron centered booster and that onward the same variant type booster should be the approach. & The Pfizer Omicron variant booster will be ready soon.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Quadrivium
Peer reviewed by whom?
By medical scientists. You know, the people who do all the peer-reviewing of medical related things.
Many of McCullough’s 600 peer-reviewed publications have appeared in top-tier journals such as the New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association and The Lancet. He testified to the U.S. Senate in November 2020 against what he described as the federal government’s politicization of health care during the pandemic, curbing or blocking the availability of cheap, effective treatments. In a speech in September, he told of having been stripped of the editorship of a Swissbased journal after having lost his position with a major health system, “with no explanation and no due process.”
Baylor University Medical Center fired him in February. And Texas A&M College of Medicine, Texas Christian University and University of North Texas Health Science Center School of Medicine have cut ties with McCullough, accusing him of spreading misinformation
“I’ve been stripped of every title that I’ve ever had in that institution. I’ve received a threat letter from the American College of Physicians, [and] a threat letter from the American Board,” he said in September. All because of his “lawful” participation “in a topic of public importance.” He said there are “powerful forces at work, far more powerful than we can possibly think of, that are influencing anybody who is in a position of authority.”
“I’ve been stripped of every title that I’ve ever had in that institution. I’ve received a threat letter from the American College of Physicians, [and] a threat letter from the American Board,” he said in September. All because of his “lawful” participation “in a topic of public importance.” He said there are “powerful forces at work, far more powerful than we can possibly think of, that are influencing anybody who is in a position of authority.”
originally posted by: Quadrivium
So, how do you get peer reviewed if your narrative does not fit into the paid programming?
originally posted by: Quadrivium
This is why 'peer review' has become a joke. Scientist are just like politicians, they can be bought or scared into manipulating the science.
but when you've got a collaboration of 3 or 4 scientists, the ability for 1 dissenter to sway the truth in the name of taking a payoff declines and the majority voice tends to be the one that is commonly accepted as true.
If everyone espoused your cynical outlook on the scientific community, we'd still be struggling with common infections.