I've cracked the code. Mega-conspiracy. BCI.

originally posted by: alphabetaone

originally posted by: themessengernevermatters

originally posted by: alphabetaone

originally posted by: SeaWorthy
Humans are created to worship our creator, that is why everyone seems to be looking for a (someone or something) to worship if they have not found their creator.

I wonder then, how exactly you explain someone like me who has a desire to worship no one, and nothing from my earliest recorded age?

originally posted by: SeaWorthy

They long ago found a part in the brain that can turn off the need to worship our creator, if they get us in a position where they can shut down all of that part of our brains they THINK they can win this fight.
They want us connected to the cloud and then THEY will instruct our heads to do what they want and worship them instead.

Whomever "they" are (which you're conspicuously vague - no, void - on) never "got to me" as i never believed this crap. Now what?

originally posted by: SeaWorthy

Add a false sense of happiness by stimulating the brain to feel it.

So, in what alternate reality are you judging a "false" signal to the brain, stimulating endorphins to produce this allged "faux happiness", with an actual signal to the brain, which is literally how you display happiness or not?

Everybody worships something, it doesn't have to be a being. It can be money and material things, it can even be ideologies and philosophies, like science.

Ok well, in this case you're wrong. You speak only for you. I worship nothing.

Same boat - though I guess it depends upon your definition of worship.

It’s hard to explain how you don’t “worship” anything but I guess it comes down to mindset. Worship is very different to me than how I feel about anything.

To be clear, I appreciate, love and enjoy many things - but not so much worship them.

To the point of the thread…

I don’t view this as a technology problem but rather a trust problem.

If there was a better track record and ample evidence that we want a free, just and rationale society then sure - why not. But, we don’t have that.

But, if you worship those in power, you’ll be ok. I don’t worship any one earthly created god let alone another human.

Lots of people worship lots of things but, since I don’t, Im probably screwed.

a reply to: Zenchuck

Interesting...

Will try and dig-up the Amazing-Polly vid, where she dots some dot-connecting involving the Jabs™, BCI™, Meta™, and some Patents™.

originally posted by: JinMI
So zombie apocalypse then.

Seems fitting.

Zombie Apocalypse with Borg leadership. Zenchuck is onto something.

It does seem like the vaxxt personalities have changed to the point where they can't consider anything outside of the government narrative.

For example, some people still think the vaxx is 100% safe and effective. But is this because they think that or because the vaxx somehow exploits that unchanging narrative?

originally posted by: sputniksteve

originally posted by: AcrobaticDreams
a reply to: Zenchuck

Just my 2 cents…most of the people I know have not had health problems nor have their personalities changed after being vaccinated (that I’ve noticed). Nor are they any more irrational than unvaccinated people. There are 3 with sudden heart issues (significant but hardly most people).

Any anecdote that goes against the narrative is just kind of ignored.

Heard that your friends uncles coworker got the vaccine and had a heart attack soon after= Good juicy research.

ATS members that got a vaccine almost a year ago and have had no adverse effects and remained covid free= That is just an anecdote and must be an outlier.

You might not undestand that those dying "with Covid" verses "from Covid" is how we got here.

We on ATS generally don't have many that use their "feelz" to decide the importance of data they are seeing. You might be thinking about Huffpo or WaPo sites. Anecdotes from people are acceptable here. Data that isn't tweaked by things that are actually playing word games is acceptable here too.

Maintaining an open mind to accept data at face value that is not fitting the Official Narrative was a part of the process of discovery. If you are not maintaining an open mind in all of this you are missing things that connect the dots.

And the Democrats say they are doing this because it's for the betterment of society.

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
It does seem like the vaxxt personalities have changed to the point where they can't consider anything outside of the government narrative.

For example, some people still think the vaxx is 100% safe and effective. But is this because they think that or because the vaxx somehow exploits that unchanging narrative?

Nothing is 100% safe and effective.

originally posted by: and14263
When you say: "unjabbed remarking on personality changes in jabbed."

I assume this is entirely anecdotal?

Please expand.


My views changed significantly after being jabbed. I had huge cognitive dissonance as defence mechanism against the poor choice I made. But I don't think my personality changed.

I believe the personality change comes from those who fight the urge to accept they made a bad decision so they double and triple down to try to convince them self they did the right thing and in result it causes people to act a certain way.

originally posted by: jidnum

originally posted by: and14263
When you say: "unjabbed remarking on personality changes in jabbed."

I assume this is entirely anecdotal?

Please expand.


My views changed significantly after being jabbed. I had huge cognitive dissonance as defence mechanism against the poor choice I made. But I don't think my personality changed.

I believe the personality change comes from those who fight the urge to accept they made a bad decision so they double and triple down to try to convince them self they did the right thing and in result it causes people to act a certain way.

I think this has something to do with it. That being said, I’ve also noticed a slight change in peoples attitudes that have the gene therapy.

originally posted by: Bloodworth

originally posted by: v1rtu0s0
It does seem like the vaxxt personalities have changed to the point where they can't consider anything outside of the government narrative.

For example, some people still think the vaxx is 100% safe and effective. But is this because they think that or because the vaxx somehow exploits that unchanging narrative?

Nothing is 100% safe and effective.

Many agree, but the fact is that when the first round of jabs came out, they told us it was 100% safe and effective and as time went on, those statements got memory holed (those quotes are still on twitter from the officials that said it). As it started dropping, people started with the whole, nothing is 100% safe and effective narrative, disregarding the fact that at one point they were actually telling people that it was, knowing damn well it wasn't 100%, it never was 100%.

originally posted by: HUSARIA

originally posted by: jidnum

originally posted by: and14263
When you say: "unjabbed remarking on personality changes in jabbed."

I assume this is entirely anecdotal?

Please expand.


My views changed significantly after being jabbed. I had huge cognitive dissonance as defence mechanism against the poor choice I made. But I don't think my personality changed.

I believe the personality change comes from those who fight the urge to accept they made a bad decision so they double and triple down to try to convince them self they did the right thing and in result it causes people to act a certain way.

I think this has something to do with it. That being said, I’ve also noticed a slight change in peoples attitudes that have the gene therapy.

This might be what people call, anecdotal, but my boss is one of those people I've noticed that had an attitude change. It's really hard to explain, it's like a mixture of anger, fear, righteousness and jealousy.

The jabs would be dangerous to rely on alone without some form of global database like a 'passport' though, or else someone nefarious could just claim they got tbe shot and pretend. No, you'd have to have some visual way to identify the compliant by mandating something trivial but immediately easy to spot, like making them wear a specific article of clothing, preferably on their head. Red neckerchiefs wound be too obvious and triggering. Hats are costly to produce and ship. It'd haveto be some sort of cloth face covering.

This all sounds fun. I’ve found, The more you know, the less you know. One thing I can tell you for fact however: have you any currency in your pocket? Do you work for compensation in form of fiat currency? Are your decisions in life based upon the support & influence of said currency? If so: you are already a zombie as referenced.

a reply to: Zenchuck

a reply to: Justoneman

I read the same threads and posts here that you do. Telling me there is no "feels" or "emotions" involved is just silly.

a reply to: Zenchuck

Sounds similar to THX 1138 a movie from 1971.

If you watch the movie you will notice more in common with your theory, than if you just read the description. I recommend checking it out if you haven't seen it. The whole movie is in on Bitchute for free.

.

originally posted by: Gothmog
a reply to: Zenchuck

mRNA technology used to create designer proteins in cells.

The scary part ?
"Genetic material" was injected into three(or more) rats. The material was designed to enter the hypothalamus gland . When the researchers aimed a specific type of laser at their hypothalamus , the rats went into full attack mode . Oh , yeah , and one died after the injection .

a reply to: Gothmog

Interesting.

I had never heard of this experiment/science so i did a quick google to find out more. First article that came up was from The Guardian in 2016 titled, Genetically engineered 'Magneto' protein remotely controls brain and behaviour"

SOURCE - www.theguardian.com...

“Next, the researchers inserted the Magneto DNA sequence into the genome of a virus, together with the gene encoding green fluorescent protein, and regulatory DNA sequences that cause the construct to be expressed only in specified types of neurons. They then injected the virus into the brains of mice, targeting the entorhinal cortex, and dissected the animals’ brains to identify the cells that emitted green fluorescence. Using microelectrodes, they then showed that applying a magnetic field to the brain slices activated Magneto so that the cells produce nervous impulses.”

The OP's points re; 5G and control don't sound too far off when considering this 'Magneto' effect...

a reply to: Dreamkidd
Precisely my point .
I saw it on "Ancient Aliens"
The only part that caught my attention , BTW

a reply to: Dreamkidd

From the article you linked: "...earlier studies have shown that nerve cell proteins which are activated by heat and mechanical pressure can be genetically engineered so that they become sensitive to radio waves..."

Thanks for the link. In terms of a conspiracy theory, I don't see any gaping holes of plausibility. The tech exists. All that is required is the will to implement. Many points line up, including the global mRNA injections and enhanced bandwidth.

There is the depopulation and money motives - I think the mind control angle can be added to the list.

The only part that doesn't fit is the need for boosters... If anyone would have an explanation for that. Maybe the proteins break down over time. I believe some countries have preordered boosters into 2024. Correct me if I am wrong.

a reply to: Zenchuck

Wicked people are the rule not the exception.