posted on Dec, 31 2021 @ 06:32 PM
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: bastion
Yet more obvious bollocks from Bitchute.
And you're surprised... why?
TheRedneck
I'm not surprised but kind of impressed by the dedication and interest to a topic for over a year but refusal to learn the first thing about it before
asserting claims from randoms are true, especialy after magnet-gate. There's also a twinge of 'I'm not angry, I'm just disapointed' (not directed at
you obviously as you're true to the scientific method and have as practical, non biased as humanly possible informed opinion on such matters - plus
know far more than I ever will about EMF/Electrical engineering stuff).
It only takes a couple of minutes to find the actual side effect insert both patient and healthcare professional info I posted earlier - the documents
give plenty of reasons why vaccine mandates are unscientific and comparing/contrasting the relevant docs across US/UK/EU shows how opaque the CDC/FDA
are in terms of their overseas equivalents. There's also plenty of leads to actual conspiracies and statistical anomaly interpretations that favoured
pfizer in their trials.
Pretending the documents don't exist and claiming instead cat lady Karen single handedly selfied scientific proof of a super duper conspiracy (and not
meth induced psychotics breakdown) only undermines the exposure of bad science and bad pharma.
The US FDA/CDC approval doc is effectively three short paragraphs of someone claiming they're happy the vaccine matched condition/theshold 'x'; I
can;'t find any supplimentary info/data behing the decision apart from vague minutes of meetings between manfacturers and FDA/CDC.
In contrast MHRA/EUA approval docs are 60 -70 pages of proper data and free access to academic databases like
www.nibsc.org... ,
www.cprd.com... www.pharmacopoeia.com... and several independent bodies to collect data and analyse emerging data.