Truth Comes Out; Bush Admin in TROUBLE

FreeMason

Next, you will be defending the lie that Iraq was invaded to spare the population any further tyranny and despotism from its leader.

Until the truth is out.

Originally posted by John Nada
The Republicans at this site are very quiet at the moment. I guess that's what happens when you use their insults and answers before they do.(which has been programmed in their head as propaganda)

Exactly, John. Now they can only resort in trying to shut ya down. Well, the Bush Admin, as far as I'm aware, haven't done anything stupid today so there is nothing to post.

MaskedAvatar we did spare Iraq from tyranny.

Saddam was not a nice man, even still many Iraqis will not go to certain places in Baghdad where more than 30,000 political prisoners were tortured and executed.

Yes, but on deeper analysis, you too will understand this had nothing to do with the reasons for invasion.

The magnitude of the PNAC lie has not yet become known to you.

Oh I don't care MA, the fact is that's what it accomplished, Bush's motives are his own to worry about.

The effect is all that matters...and the effect is goodbye hell hole.

Yes.

Goodbye hellhole.

Hello hell on earth.

from the heart of Texas

www.dfw.com...
molly_ivins/6322345.htm

Posted on Thu, Jul. 17, 2003 storyUB_DESC
Could we try to avert riots?
By Molly Ivins
Creators Syndicate

I opposed the war in Iraq because I thought it would lead to the peace from hell, but I'd rather not see my prediction come true, and I don't think we have much time left to avert it.

That the occupation is not going well is apparent to everyone but Donald Rumsfeld. If this thing turns into Vietnam simply because that man is too vain and arrogant to admit that Gen. Eric Shinseki was right when he said we would need "several hundred thousand troops" over there, I hope Rumsfeld rots in a hell worse than the one he's making.
etc....
It is more than painfully apparent that the Pentagon did somewhere between inadequate to zero planning for the occupation, despite the equally apparent fact that this war was settled on more than a year in advance and then intelligence was bent to support it.etc.................
Ol' "Bring 'em on" Bush talks tough and can't even figure out how to find the right stick.

I'll say it again, "democraps" or "repigs," it really doesn't matter, because the last thing any of these old, white, balding, worthless sacks of wrinkled flesh care about is the people...

In 2000 the Supreme Court over ruled the popular vote and gave shrub the WH.

All the righties rejoiced, "Finally a moral and righteous man is in the WH!!"

Here we are 3 years later and we now know the truth about shrub.

> he's a cokehead boozer & deserter
> his daddy bought his way outta Nam with the Texas Air Gaurd
> he had dirty dealings with the binLaden family for over 20 years
> he sent our young people to fight a war on a lie
> he & his rich cronies have made billions since 2000 while he bleeds the country dry and allows good paying American jobs to go overseas
> he has created the largest deficit in US history in just 3 years, even more than the deficit created by Reagan/Bush in 12 years

Now those same righties are saying "We know all politicians are crooked and we know shrub lied but he had to because we're all idiots!!"

Well this idiot hopes many other idiots vote for the lesser of the two idiots in 2004 and shrub is unceremoniously kicked to the curb!!!

Harrier

Agreed in total.

But why wait for 2004?

Also, a reminder... when the administration is gone, remind them to repay the war profits back to their rightful owners.

Oh, I forgot. They are gathering signatures from many complicit nations to prevent their War Crimes reaching any international court or tribunal.

[Edited on 23-7-2003 by MaskedAvatar]

Democratic presidential candidate Joe Lieberman unleashed a torrent of attacks Wednesday, but this time, not all were directed at President Bush.

A centrist in an increasingly liberal party, Lieberman defends his support for war against Iraq, and calls the anti-war rhetoric of his opponent, former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean , as the talk of an unelectable dove.

"I don't believe the American people are going to elect for president in 2004, post 9/11, in an unsettled world, a candidate who has been opposed to the use of military power against a brutal dictator like Saddam Hussein," he said.

Lieberman himself faults Bush with not gaining enough international support to finish the job of bringing freedom to Iraq, but he said his opponents' accusations discredit only themselves.

"When you constantly criticize the war, even after it's over, even after the world is so much safer with Saddam Hussein gone and the people of Iraq have a chance for a better life, you send a message of softness on defense," he said.

www.foxnews.com...

PRESIDENT'S STATEMENT REASSURING AMERICANS HE WOULD NEVER MISLEAD THEM ABOUT HOT & SLOPPY OVAL OFFICE HUMMERS
Statement by the President

THE PRESIDENT: My fellow Americans. In recent days, I have looked on in bewildered rage as the non-FOX news media has virtually ignored all my fabulously-produced photo ops in favor of twisting its liberal Jewish panties into a musty wad over 16 lousy words in my 2003 State of the Union address � something about the Iraqazoids buying nukular stuff from Nigerstan.


www.whitehouse.org...