It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: Bluntone22
If that is how you want to compare it, sure. However it seems that the owners and publishers of Time Magazine are also rather wealth and have risen to the tops of their profession yet here is a thread calling out their team for poor decisions. I expect that their judgement is based on their own understanding of what the public will buy and that is their profession.
originally posted by: Mark08
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
I have the same amount she does
I'm not trying to downplay this girls accomplishments
originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: Bluntone22
I'm not trying to downplay this girls accomplishments
Girl? Hardly. She is not a child, and at 24 a grown woman. But sure, she might have resigned prior to the contests but you know what? We don't know the levels of stress involved. We don't know what caused her to lose that mental edge that it takes to do what she does. So I will leave all the judgment of her actions to others who think that they do know the true level and nature of the stresses placed upon her.
originally posted by: oddscreenname
a reply to: AgarthaSeed
Oh, yeah, no, I'm being serious.
All the time we have to deal with employees calling out for "mental health days".
originally posted by: Bluntone22
a reply to: ketsuko
I don't think it's fair to say she failed. She does have Olympic gold.
I am not talking about an athletic failure. Obviously she's not. I am talking about having failed in that situation. She did. The two are not mutually exclusive. What I take exception to is that she's not being rewarded for her athletic successes but for her glaring failure.