It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: NorthOfStuff
a reply to: carewemust
Back in the early 20th century doctors recommended smoking for a variety of ailments. They followed the science.
We’ve been lead to believe lately that science shouldn’t be questioned.
Smoke em if ya got em.
2.) CONGRESS and STAFFERS have exempted themselves from any Covid-19 Vaccination Mandate. PROOF: www.foxnews.com... 3.) WHITE HOUSE STAFF have exempted themselves from any Covid-19 Vaccination Mandate. PROOF: www.foxnews.com...
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: NorthOfStuff
a reply to: carewemust
Back in the early 20th century doctors recommended smoking for a variety of ailments. They followed the science.
We’ve been lead to believe lately that science shouldn’t be questioned.
Smoke em if ya got em.
On the battlefield, soldiers were given a cigarette to ease their pain.
originally posted by: NorthOfStuff
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: NorthOfStuff
a reply to: carewemust
Back in the early 20th century doctors recommended smoking for a variety of ailments. They followed the science.
We’ve been lead to believe lately that science shouldn’t be questioned.
Smoke em if ya got em.
On the battlefield, soldiers were given a cigarette to ease their pain.
I didn’t know that.
Just like giving the vax to ease the Covid.
History repeating itself.
originally posted by: NorthOfStuff
a reply to: carewemust
I saw a video of a Pfizer exec talking about their immunity to any liability. If you look at the countries that were slow to receive vaccines you’ll see that they were the ones that were reluctant to offer this immunity. The exec said as much.
I wonder if they are using the old or new definition of immunity?
originally posted by: opethPA
a reply to: carewemust
1. For once you stayed honest and fact driven on this statement.
2. The Sept Mandate only applies to the Executive Branch of which Congress is not a part.
www.usatoday.com...
3 . The WhiteHouse staff article is from July 23 and is no longer applicable . This has been stated multiple times in other threads yet you choose to ignore that fact...
www.factcheck.org...
originally posted by: nugget1
a reply to: asabuvsobelow
"Biden’s vaccine requirements were issued in the form of an executive order – directives that apply only to the executive branch. Congress is the legislative branch, and thus, is not subject to the order. "
www.usatoday.com... ry/news/factcheck/2021/09/20/fact-check-biden-cant-mandate-vaccines-congress/8384930002/
originally posted by: opethPA
a reply to: carewemust
1. For once you stayed honest and fact driven on this statement.
2. The Sept Mandate only applies to the Executive Branch of which Congress is not a part.
www.usatoday.com...
3 . The WhiteHouse staff article is from July 23 and is no longer applicable . This has been stated multiple times in other threads yet you choose to ignore that fact...
www.factcheck.org...
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: asabuvsobelow
Bidens order or edicts are just that. Not law.
As we have separation of powers, his purview is solely within the executive branch. He has no control over the other branches of govt.
Now the vaccine edicts were directed at businesses, which was struck down....again, by the courts.
Everything else pertaining to the white house staff is spot on. They don't practice what they preach etc.