It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ElGoobero
I feel like there are a lot of ungrateful kids that, now they are grown, don't need their parents so they're cutting them off as a nuisance.
think the internet let a lot of people look more objectively at how they live, and many of them realized it was a pile of crap.
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: putnam6
'This be the verse'
They # you up, your mum and dad.
They may not mean to, but they do.
They fill you with the faults they had
And add some extra, just for you.
But they were #ed up in their turn
By fools in old-style hats and coats,
Who half the time were soppy-stern
And half at one another's throats.
Man hands on misery to man.
It deepens like a coastal shelf.
Get out as early as you can,
And don't have any kids yourself.
By Philip Larkin.
originally posted by: EventideExpanse
a reply to: ElGoobero
This is precisely how the powers that be like it. It's important to sever familial and community ties so all a person has to rely on is the state.
originally posted by: surfer_soul
There are also a lot of poor patents who do not work hard enough to make life work when their kids go through hard or confusing times, eg as a teenager.
Being poor/growing up poor has nothing to do with morality or ones beliefs and cultural values.
Kids behaviour past the age of 7 is largely influenced by their friends and peers much more so than their parents. It’s generally the system that fails people who are poor.
Turning this around and blaming the parents for “not working hard enough” to make life work for a (often never satisfied) teenager is a cop out and bs.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: and14263
Don't work hard enough to make life work?! Perhaps you are too old to recall being young when you were you were absolutely certain your parents couldn't possibly understand a thing you were going through because 19-dickety-2 was nothing like the super-evolved and enlightened times *you* were growing up in, so nothing they had to say really mattered.
originally posted by: ElGoobero
BBC article about adults 'cutting off' their parents
Formally known as ‘estrangement’, experts’ definitions of the concept differ slightly, but the term is broadly used for situations in which someone cuts off all communication with one or more relatives, a situation that continues for the long-term, even if those they’ve sought to split from try to re-establish a connection.
“The declaration of ‘I am done’ with a family member is a powerful and distinct phenomenon,” explains Karl Andrew Pillemer, professor of human development at Cornell University, US. “It is different from family feuds, from high-conflict situations and from relationships that are emotionally distant but still include contact.”
not surprisingly a lot of this is about politics
experts believe at least part of the context for this is increased political and cultural polarisation in recent years. In the US, an Ipsos poll reported a rise in family rifts after the 2016 election, while research by academics at Stanford University in 2012 suggested a larger proportion of parents could be unhappy if their children married someone who supported a rival political party, which was far less true a decade earlier. A recent UK study found that one in 10 people had fallen out with a relative over Brexit. “These studies highlight the way that identity has become a far greater determinant of whom we choose to keep close or to let go,” says Coleman.
personally I'm seeing a huge value rift between old / middle aged persons and kids over values, traditional / Christian vs 'progressive' anti-traditional anti-Christian.
shame we can't better agree to disagree.
I feel like there are a lot of ungrateful kids that, now they are grown, don't need their parents so they're cutting them off as a nuisance.
very sad.
Once you realize the problems in your life are amplified by a toxic family, do you really think intelligent people would keep themselves in that situation? In the 60's all day long. They would never leave. They would be abused. They would have had to read stacks of books to figure out a fraction of what was going on.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Nyiah
I grew up poor with a sister. My parents worked hard at every level, but the results could not be more different. One of us is fairly successful and the other is a dysfunctional wreck. At some point. It is the kids too.
originally posted by: surfer_soul
a reply to: Nyiah
You might be right, but I picked up on the “don’t work hard enough” which people often use an excuse for being poor.
You are certainly right about poor parenting as a thing though, I’m not disputing this. What I’m against is the state stepping in to do the job, or more precisely the state causing division in the first place. For me a good parent loves their children more than anything else and will try their best for them. Thankfully for most parents this is a natural instinct.
I’m British and over here a working class minimum wage level mother is better off financially being single, the more kids they have the more so. Anything the working class father contributes financially will be taken away by the state. Because the state needs to step in to cover the cost of living and a low income earner can’t cover that for a small family. So right there we are seeing one of the main factors that keep relationships going being taken away. The break up of the family unit.
Going back historically it took both parents to raise children, taking on different roles in doing so, it’s also true of much of the animal kingdom. But today the father simply isn’t needed, the state has taken his place instead.
That might sound sexist but hopefully you see my point.