posted on Feb, 23 2022 @ 01:03 PM
a reply to:
Shoujikina
Furthermore, why should a fact require an argument behind it? Are you saying water CEASES TO BE WET unless someone ARGUES SOLIDLY about it?
If I come up to you and say "water is wet. Don't question me on it, that's just the way it is." Should you believe me or should you question it?
The wetness of water isn't the point, it's the understanding of what/why. If someone argues for water being wet but then says it's because God(S)
ordain it so, water is still wet but they're wrong in WHY it's wet. So if someone makes a bad argument for the wetness of water, you SHOULD argue
against it, for the sake of a better reason why, not necessarily to tear it down.