Major medical journal slams the jab. It must be stopped.

After a great deal of research, a major journal on Heart and circulatory issues has come out and stated unequivocally that the mRNA vaccine is dangerous to the epithelium of the heart and must be stopped with haste. It is like the prestigious magazine Nature discarding it to the rubbish bin of history.If it is still pushed after this it really is murder.vernoncoleman.org...

originally posted by: anonentity
After a great deal of research, a major journal on Heart and circulatory issues has come out and stated unequivocally that the mRNA vaccine is dangerous to the epithelium of the heart and must be stopped with haste. It is like the prestigious magazine Nature discarding it to the rubbish bin of history.If it is still pushed after this it really is murder.vernoncoleman.org...[/q uote]


What puzzles me is with millions of nurses around the world, why are they not reporting this on live chats. I'm waiting for local news of our new committee on side effects that was formed here in Japan to start reporting facts and not rumors.

a reply to: musicismagic

People would rather endanger themselves and the world, than get fired from work.

Thats a terrible position for a medical person to find themselves in, since they take an oath to "do no harm".

Maybe they redirect that oath to "do no harm to thine self'.

a reply to: carewemust

Yes, its like a contractor not paying its employees and running off to a foreign country like Thailand. Personal story here.

a reply to: anonentity

Where is the article? Articles in Circulation, the journal of th American Heart Association, can be viewed online freely; you could post a link to it here. Even abstracts of articles of interest not published in the magazine are viewable.

Where's the article, where's the link? Why aren't the article title, authors and issue of publication mentioned in your post or your link?

Totally convinced by someone on a anti vax website, reading a single line out of an study they dont link to, then saying any medical staff giving the jab will be struck off and arrested.

Stop the Jab now!!!!!

a reply to: musicismagic

I’m reading lots of nurses tweets on another website blowing the whistle on this.

Nurses are tweeting about it and their tweets are being reposted.

Also hundreds of “threads” being posted of people’s tweets where they speak about being jabbed then next tweet shows they died or horribly injured after being injected with the mRNA gene therapy - I refuse to call it a vaccine because it is not, they had to re-write their definition and it doesn’t even meet he definition after they re-wrote it.

originally posted by: Astyanax
a reply to: anonentity

Where is the article?

Here it is:

Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning

Steven R Gundry
Originally published8 Nov 2021Circulation. 2021;144:A10712

Abstract

Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue, among other markers. Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score.The score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years. Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.This report summarizes those results. A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.

Another ATS thread by v1rtu0s0 with similar information (and concerns) which should probably all be taken and considered together:

The Biggest Story Not Being Talked About - The Pfizer Whistleblower

When the whistle blower reported all of these issues to the FDA, the FDA immediately contacted their employer, Ventavia, who then subsequently fired them. This makes it pretty clear about what's going on.

The implications from this trial are pretty incredible. If the data we are using to justify handing out these vaccines and boosters to billions of people was faked and manipulated much like the 2009 lawsuit illustrated, then the entire world is going to be very, very upset. And it would explain the record number of adverse effects we are seeing from across the world, even with only the small fraction that get reported in vaers, there are still over 1.7 million adverse effects reported:

Knowledge is power. Be careful and be safe out there in the real world....

a reply to: Boadicea

And BOOM goes the dynamite.

So much for the howls of "It doesn't hurt anything!" That'll be a cold plate of crow, waiter. Make it raw.

originally posted by: Nyiah
a reply to: Boadicea

And BOOM goes the dynamite.

So much for the howls of "It doesn't hurt anything!" That'll be a cold plate of crow, waiter. Make it raw.

Powerful analogy. No pun intended. It just is what it is.

Even with all the evidence on the jab, you still do not see any of this big pharms working on a reliable and more stable jab the old fashion way, you know why? because it was never about the darn virus.

More and more the real truth behind this jabs is coming to light.

originally posted by: marg6043
Even with all the evidence on the jab, you still do not see any of this big pharms working on a reliable and more stable jab the old fashion way, you know why? because it was never about the darn virus.

More and more the real truth behind this jabs is coming to light.

Novavax but someone is trying to block it
www.msn.com...

It seems a safer alternative imho

a reply to: Raggedyman
Injecting spike proteins made by moth cells sounds great

a reply to: anonentity

Nothing will stop them now they're in to deep and it
was never about covid.

Doesn't matter will still be forced down Our throats, Science left the building long ago.

originally posted by: musicismagic
a reply to: carewemust

Yes, its like a contractor not paying its employees and running off to a foreign country like Thailand. Personal story here.

Thats pretty mean, You should go back and pay those poor employees... Of course I kid, unless You really did bug out.

a reply to: anonentity

Firstly, I wanted to scold you for linking a terrible blog post that doesn't even link the study. Are you getting paid to promote such garbage?

Anyway - onto the article:

These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.

Big unanswered question: does the ACS risk return to the baseline after 2.5 months? If the 5 year ACS score returns to normal within a couple months, does that mean the risk becomes negligible?

Other unanswered question: What happens to these metrics for a person who becomes infected with COVID-19? Or what about a person who was vaccinated and then becomes infected?

Interesting article either way, but needs more research before I (personally) would be alarmed.

All the numbers are off, how is it lower vaccinated southern states are still showing fewer cases per million than more vaccinated regions elsewhere

metrics.covid19-analysis.org...



and how is lockdown mandated vaccinated Australia matching unvaccinated Georgia right now in the transmission rate and daily cases per million and this is with Australia's data being incomplete. Even the gap in daily deaths per million is closing and right now the difference is about 8 in Georgia and 1 in Australia.

originally posted by: Boadicea

originally posted by: Astyanax
a reply to: anonentity

Where is the article?

Here it is:

Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning

Steven R Gundry
Originally published8 Nov 2021Circulation. 2021;144:A10712

Abstract

Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue, among other markers. Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score.The score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years. Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.This report summarizes those results. A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.

and that's why you are the awsomeist. (my grandson taught me that word)
Very well done.

originally posted by: putnam6
All the numbers are off, how is it lower vaccinated southern states are still showing fewer cases per million than more vaccinated regions elsewhere

Good question. And I would imagine there are various factors and circumstances that would be significant both alone and in combination with other factors.

One factor is that we should probably expect fewer cases in warm, sunny southern states than the colder and darker northern states, simply because warmth and sunlight are both natural enemies of all viruses. Even with lower vaccination rates and fewer Covid mandates like masks and social distancing. People also tend to spend more time outside in warmer southern states because they have more opportunity to do so comfortably and enjoyably.

But that is only one factor among many. Unfortunately, no one seems interested or compelled to find out why with proper studies and analyses.