Kyle Rittenhouse is about to testify. Livestream here

a reply to: The GUT

Binger is a state prosecutor with many years of service.

During this trial, three times mind you, he has attempted to violate witnesses constitutional rights.

We see it because this is a high profile case. It begs the question; how often does he do this when the camera isn't on?

How many other state prosecutors also participate in this behavior?

originally posted by: The GUT
Watching a very bizarre & sleazy politico like Binger self-destruct and the whole faux-narrative laid bare has been a rare delight in these rather dark "progressive" days.

Yesterday when I was off work I watched all day having a few beers then my wife got home and watched and we couldnt believe our eyes when he was repeating the same question over and over trying to twist words it was crazy.

a reply to: carewemust
Well supposedly Biden is protecting a victim that some are accusing him of being a "Child Abuser" maybe it would have being wiser if the most popular president ever would have not said anything on this trail.

The Biden admin clearly wants to protect the rioters side.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: The GUT

Binger is a state prosecutor with many years of service.

During this trial, three times mind you, he has attempted to violate witnesses constitutional rights.

We see it because this is a high profile case. It begs the question; how often does he do this when the camera isn't on?

How many other state prosecutors also participate in this behavior?

In Roman times, the architects who designed a bridge were required to sleep under it. In a truly just society, any Prosecutor who lies, abuses defendants' rights, or hides or withholds exculpatory evidence should automatically be forced to serve the sentence they sought for the defendant.

a reply to: SentientBunnySuit

Yea, lets do that. While at it, force politicians to fight their own wars!

So if Kyle Rittenhouse is somehow found guilty. Will that mean nobody is allowed to defend theirself with a gun anymore?

originally posted by: asd161
So if Kyle Rittenhouse is somehow found guilty. Will that mean nobody is allowed to defend theirself with a gun anymore?

No, it would just mean that only leftists would be allowed to, just as Soros ordered.

A capitol police officer kills an unarmed Ashley Babbit in self defense and gets supported by the left.

A 17 year olds life is threated with violence from a convicted pedophile and the left wants to send him to jail for life.

Here comes the MSM with paying people to lie !!!!!

Bitter Twitter Post......🤣🤣


Gaige Grosskreutz goes on CNN and claims his arms were raised when he was shot by Kyle Rittenhouse, contradicting his sworn testimony.

a reply to: xuenchen

I saw him on Good Morning America stating the same thing. Wasn't there rumors going around that he was possible Israeli intelligence? After the big F'up in his under oath testimony it will be interesting to see all the Fake News outlets he hits to try and change the narrative to get the gullible people that didn't watch the trial to believe his nonsense when the court case will be ruled for Rittenhouse. They have to sow division one way or another and the are setting the stage to really get the riots going..

a reply to: Charliebrowndog

All part of the next looting spree frenzy 😎

a reply to: DBCowboy

A capitol police officer kills an unarmed Ashley Babbit in self defense and gets supported by the left.

A 17 year olds life is threated with violence from a convicted pedophile and the left wants to send him to jail for life.

also, a rioter is shot and killed by somebody in self defense, The right wing nut jobs declare her a hero and patriot,

A right wing nut job obtains a weapon illegally, crosses state line, places himself into harms way and kills 2 unarmed civilians, the right wing nut jobs call shooter a hero.

Bringing up the "pedophile" thing, does absolutely nothing in justifying his shooting him. Only in the minds of the evil right wing nut jobs. Was he wearing a placard declaring himself a pedophile? Do you know the details of the case?

The killing of Ashli Babitt was ruled justified self defense, She was a rioter attacking the capitol. KR? IDK. Glad I am not on that jury.
He intentionally put himself into harms way with a firearm.

I do not know the exact timeline of events, but just think about this... KR shoots and kills a civilian on a public street... He shoots and kills a second civilian on a public street, somebody exercising their 2nd amendment rights pulls a concealed weapon and shoots and kills an active shooter. He might be proclaimed a hero for stopping an active shooter. That did not happen of course.

Glad I am not on that jury. He went looking for trouble and found it. Was it self defense? maybe.

a reply to: FunshineCD

I think we’re all glad you’re not on the jury.

a reply to: FunshineCD

lies all lies 😎

a reply to: FunshineCD

You discredit yourself with that post.

Just one wrong point you have is the state line argument.

Never happened.

www.npr.org... es-in-illinois

"Additionally, there is no evidence the gun was ever physically possessed by Kyle Rittenhouse in Illinois," the state's attorney's office added. Police in Antioch, Ill., led the investigation. Antioch is Rittenhouse's hometown, which is located about 15 miles southwest of Kenosha.

a reply to: FunshineCD

crosses state line

Oooo..sounds super serial, when did that become illegal?

I think it’s funny how the left is so serious about state lines but wants open borders.

Lol

originally posted by: DBCowboy
I think it’s funny how the left is so serious about state lines but wants open borders.

Lol

Some are seemingly unable to be, or have the desire to be objective, or be realistic.

a reply to: FunshineCD

So a felon with a gun disability for being…a felon. Was carrying concealed….you really don’t want to continue down that path, do you? I mean sticking up for and defending a pedophile is reprehensible enough but trying to justify a person that can’t legally touch a gun to go about brandishing one (at the low end of the spectrum of illegal acts). His possession is enough to get a return trip to prison alone.

I mean it isn’t as laughable as Beto who can’t own (due to his felonious past) a gun trying grab all guns. But it’s up there.

a reply to: FunshineCD

I do not know the exact timeline of events

It would probably be prudent then to not comment on events you know nothing about else make yourself appear even more ignorant.

The facts are there and you still remain to be ignorant of them.