It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

2 shots later 1 booster later man has very little protection from covid 19

page: 2
13
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 9 2021 @ 03:04 PM
link   
Hell enough of this crap. Either a you want it or b you dont. The thing that people should be focusing on is if it does compromise the immune system, is there a way to fix. From all the # data no one knows. Which means it isnt perfect. Personally I'll never be a lab rat. But a booster for an experiment, hmmm well maybe if we give more.... I'm sure I'm not alone in this I'm sick of these damn threads. We need to try to find a cure for it, the vax. If you like the vax? Great shut the hell up take your boosters and hopefully have a great life



posted on Nov, 9 2021 @ 03:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: ScepticScot


If booster shots are required so what?


Then it doesn't fit the definition of a vaccine.

Keep lining up for the government jab "sceptic".




Many vaccines require booster shots.



posted on Nov, 9 2021 @ 03:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: holydarkness

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: DarkestConspiracyMoon

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: holydarkness

originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: holydarkness

Wait what?

Someone on immunosuppressants has s compromised immune system.

That definitely changes everything...


My wife has a severely immunosuppressive she caught it and no issues never went to the hospital



Well if you know someone who was OK that definitely means everyone else would be.

And the same # applies to the vaccine just because you or others experienced no harm from it doesn't mean everybody else had the same result. Y'all are biased though so you only apply it to covid.


No I look at what the data says.

Not personal anecdotes.


And the data says the covid 19 vaccine offers little to NO protection after 6 or 7 months

So one more time i ask how many shots are you willing to take?


50% effectivness is still far better than 0.

90% effectiveness against dying from covid is a hell of a lot better than 0.

www.reuters.com...

If booster shots are required so what?


So, prior to your jab you were 100% guaranteed to die from covid? You had zero natural immunities? Because that's the only way you could come up with your 0% BS.



posted on Nov, 9 2021 @ 03:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: holydarkness

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: holydarkness

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: DarkestConspiracyMoon

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: holydarkness

originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: holydarkness

Wait what?

Someone on immunosuppressants has s compromised immune system.

That definitely changes everything...


My wife has a severely immunosuppressive she caught it and no issues never went to the hospital



Well if you know someone who was OK that definitely means everyone else would be.

And the same # applies to the vaccine just because you or others experienced no harm from it doesn't mean everybody else had the same result. Y'all are biased though so you only apply it to covid.


No I look at what the data says.

Not personal anecdotes.


And the data says the covid 19 vaccine offers little to NO protection after 6 or 7 months

So one more time i ask how many shots are you willing to take?


50% effectivness is still far better than 0.

90% effectiveness against dying from covid is a hell of a lot better than 0.

www.reuters.com...

If booster shots are required so what?


The math tells us that you have a 98% of survival rate with no vaccine


Probably higher than that across the whole population.

However 2% of the US population over 6 million people.



posted on Nov, 9 2021 @ 03:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: ScepticScot


If booster shots are required so what?


Then it doesn't fit the definition of a vaccine.

Keep lining up for the government jab "sceptic".




Many vaccines require booster shots.




Please show a list for your statement for vaccines require booster shots?

Every vaccine i had as a child i have never got a booster shot.
The only vaccine i took more then once was hepatitis b when i was a paramedic and if i remember right it was once every 10 YEARS. not 6 months



posted on Nov, 9 2021 @ 03:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: Joneselius
Are the makers of bulletproof vests telling you that you don't need to worry about bullets because you own one? a reply to: OccamsRazor04



If these vaccines were bulletproof vests, they would be rated very very low... very close to ineffective.

Explain why, they would be extremely highly rated. The purpose of the vest is not to make bullets miss you, but make them less likely to harm you. The vaccine does exactly that, depending on strain, you may get infected, but the infection is very unlikely to be serious.



posted on Nov, 9 2021 @ 03:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: ScepticScot


If booster shots are required so what?


Then it doesn't fit the definition of a vaccine.

Keep lining up for the government jab "sceptic".




Many vaccines require booster shots.



Yep scientificly studied and APPROVED series of treatments.
Not some throw it against the wall, neverending line of "booster" shots of experimental serums.



posted on Nov, 9 2021 @ 03:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: underpass61

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: holydarkness

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: DarkestConspiracyMoon

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: holydarkness

originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: holydarkness

Wait what?

Someone on immunosuppressants has s compromised immune system.

That definitely changes everything...


My wife has a severely immunosuppressive she caught it and no issues never went to the hospital



Well if you know someone who was OK that definitely means everyone else would be.

And the same # applies to the vaccine just because you or others experienced no harm from it doesn't mean everybody else had the same result. Y'all are biased though so you only apply it to covid.


No I look at what the data says.

Not personal anecdotes.


And the data says the covid 19 vaccine offers little to NO protection after 6 or 7 months

So one more time i ask how many shots are you willing to take?


50% effectivness is still far better than 0.

90% effectiveness against dying from covid is a hell of a lot better than 0.

www.reuters.com...

If booster shots are required so what?


So, prior to your jab you were 100% guaranteed to die from covid? You had zero natural immunities? Because that's the only way you could come up with your 0% BS.


No it doesn't , that isn't what vaccine effectivness means . But keep commenting on a subject without even basic knowledge about it, it always works out well...



posted on Nov, 9 2021 @ 03:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: holydarkness

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: ScepticScot


If booster shots are required so what?


Then it doesn't fit the definition of a vaccine.

Keep lining up for the government jab "sceptic".




Many vaccines require booster shots.




Please show a list for your statement for vaccines require booster shots?

Every vaccine i had as a child i have never got a booster shot.
The only vaccine i took more then once was hepatitis b when i was a paramedic and if i remember right it was once every 10 YEARS. not 6 months


www.webmd.com...

Glad to help you learn.



posted on Nov, 9 2021 @ 03:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: ScepticScot


If booster shots are required so what?


Then it doesn't fit the definition of a vaccine.

Keep lining up for the government jab "sceptic".




Many vaccines require booster shots.



Yep scientificly studied and APPROVED series of treatments.
Not some throw it against the wall, neverending line of "booster" shots of experimental serums.




If you are that scared of vaccines feel free not to get it .



posted on Nov, 9 2021 @ 03:15 PM
link   
He has a great question for the CDC about their own website info on natural immunity!
Why does their website show natural immunity as superior?





posted on Nov, 9 2021 @ 03:16 PM
link   
a reply to: holydarkness

Flu requires a vaccine yearly, tetanus, diptheria, pertussis, hep b is not recommended but effectiveness does wane, I am 43 and I had to get revaccinated for school.



posted on Nov, 9 2021 @ 03:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: holydarkness

originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: holydarkness

Wait what?

Someone on immunosuppressants has s compromised immune system.

That definitely changes everything...


My wife has a severely immunosuppressive she caught it and no issues never went to the hospital


Same here I have late stage Lyme.



posted on Nov, 9 2021 @ 03:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: holydarkness

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: ScepticScot


If booster shots are required so what?


Then it doesn't fit the definition of a vaccine.

Keep lining up for the government jab "sceptic".




Many vaccines require booster shots.




Please show a list for your statement for vaccines require booster shots?

Every vaccine i had as a child i have never got a booster shot.
The only vaccine i took more then once was hepatitis b when i was a paramedic and if i remember right it was once every 10 YEARS. not 6 months


www.webmd.com...

Glad to help you learn.


which one of those listed has a high fatality rate?
none

Please show a study that links any of those vaccines that compare even remotely close to the covid 19 vaccine

it has been proven the covid 19 vaccine has killed WAY more then any other vaccine ever has
edit on 9-11-2021 by holydarkness because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 9 2021 @ 03:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: holydarkness

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: holydarkness

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: ScepticScot


If booster shots are required so what?


Then it doesn't fit the definition of a vaccine.

Keep lining up for the government jab "sceptic".




Many vaccines require booster shots.




Please show a list for your statement for vaccines require booster shots?

Every vaccine i had as a child i have never got a booster shot.
The only vaccine i took more then once was hepatitis b when i was a paramedic and if i remember right it was once every 10 YEARS. not 6 months


www.webmd.com...

Glad to help you learn.


which one of those listed has a high fatality rate?
none


What fatality rate are you taking about?



posted on Nov, 9 2021 @ 03:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: holydarkness

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: holydarkness

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: ScepticScot


If booster shots are required so what?


Then it doesn't fit the definition of a vaccine.

Keep lining up for the government jab "sceptic".




Many vaccines require booster shots.




Please show a list for your statement for vaccines require booster shots?

Every vaccine i had as a child i have never got a booster shot.
The only vaccine i took more then once was hepatitis b when i was a paramedic and if i remember right it was once every 10 YEARS. not 6 months


www.webmd.com...

Glad to help you learn.


which one of those listed has a high fatality rate?
none


For your edit. no it hasn't.
edit on 9-11-2021 by ScepticScot because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 9 2021 @ 03:24 PM
link   
a reply to: holydarkness

Good old CNN





posted on Nov, 9 2021 @ 03:24 PM
link   
a reply to: ScepticScot




50% effectivness is still far better than 0. 


Natural immune systems around the world are proving you wrong.

I doubt you're bright enough to understand that though...



posted on Nov, 9 2021 @ 03:24 PM
link   
a reply to: holydarkness

How many doses given, how many deaths proven to be caused by the vaccine and not something else?



posted on Nov, 9 2021 @ 03:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: shooterbrody

originally posted by: ScepticScot

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: ScepticScot


If booster shots are required so what?


Then it doesn't fit the definition of a vaccine.

Keep lining up for the government jab "sceptic".




Many vaccines require booster shots.



Yep scientificly studied and APPROVED series of treatments.
Not some throw it against the wall, neverending line of "booster" shots of experimental serums.




If you are that scared of vaccines feel free not to get it .

Lol
When beaten insult.
Scared of a government mandating an experimental medical treatment? Who wouldn't be?
Oh, I know, a sceptic........
Wait.....
That doesn't mean that????







 
13
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join