It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: GenerationGap
Not that I need more data, but this Pfizer document presented to the FDA on October 25th, 2021 sure has an interesting item on page 33.
Here's the document:
drive.google.com...
Under Scenario 3 (lowest incidence), the model predicts more excess hospitalizations due to vaccine-related myocarditis/pericarditis compared to prevented hospitalizations due to COVID-19 in males and in both sexes combined.
Only in crazy land is that scenario even remotely worth risking, and that's from Pfizer's own admission.
Yet here comes the fascist vaxers to tell us all it's all proven to be completely safe. Again, only the willfully blind do not recognize it is time to shut this off the rails medical experiment down. It's a dud. A dangerous dud at that. Further pressure and coercion is only going to further damage the reputation of current medical science and its products in the minds of the rational, objective, and sane.
However, in
consideration of the different clinical implications of hospitalization for COVID-19 versus
hospitalization for vaccine-associated myocarditis/pericarditis, and benefits related to prevention
of non-hospitalized cases of COVID-19 with significant morbidity, the overall benefits of the
vaccine may still outweigh the risks under this lowest incidence scenario. If the
myocarditis/pericarditis risk in this age group is lower than the conservative assumption used in
the model, the benefit-risk balance would be even more favorable
originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: MDDoxs
I doesn't sound as if your up to speed on the most current
data on the Mrna drugs, they are NOT safe or effective.
One study recently showed over 90% of the people in
a hospital had been "vaccinated" at least once. Over
70% of them had been fully vaxxed.
If your going to go around spreading disinformation,
you had best be prepared to get a confrontation.
This isn't 2020 where we were just scared into submission
with little scientific data, but heaps of fear mongering!
I highly suggest you get your head out from your "helmet".
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: ScepticScot
Lol
No
Getting covid is better than taking experimental anything.
originally posted by: MDDoxs
a reply to: GenerationGap
Well good for you I guess making the decision. Heaping a bunch of junk conclusions in this post was probably not needed. You could have just said " I dun trust them gooberments" and we would have understood.
I find it funny that both sides of this debate, vaccinated and unvaccinated, like to spout a bunch of less than accurate facts as to why they choose to do one thing or the other. Just confuses the whole thing.
You should have just made you decision and not rushed to all your social media streams so you can get some interwebz points.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: ScepticScot
Lol
No
Getting covid is better than taking experimental anything.
Number of deaths says otherwise.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: ScepticScot
Lol
No
Getting covid is better than taking experimental anything.
Number of deaths says otherwise.
originally posted by: GenerationGap
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: ScepticScot
Lol
No
Getting covid is better than taking experimental anything.
Number of deaths says otherwise.
Are you comparing non vaccinated to vaccinated deaths from February 2020 to today or July 2021 (Approx when US reached 50% vaxed) to today?
Or just list the studies you are using to formulate your position. But if it's the same one Brandon has been referring to since May, it's utter garbage, and don't bother.
Also, let's theorize that 75% of any heart related deaths above previous years averages are Covid 19 caused.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: ScepticScot
Lol
No
Getting covid is better than taking experimental anything.
Number of deaths says otherwise.
And you guarantee no permanent side effects?
Lol
Of course you will......
Wonder why my request for a such a waiver at work falls on deaf ears?
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: GenerationGap
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: ScepticScot
Lol
No
Getting covid is better than taking experimental anything.
Number of deaths says otherwise.
Are you comparing non vaccinated to vaccinated deaths from February 2020 to today or July 2021 (Approx when US reached 50% vaxed) to today?
Or just list the studies you are using to formulate your position. But if it's the same one Brandon has been referring to since May, it's utter garbage, and don't bother.
Also, let's theorize that 75% of any heart related deaths above previous years averages are Covid 19 caused.
There are multiple studies showing vaccine effectiveness against dying from covid.
Here is a recent one.
www.bmj.com...#:~:text=News-,Covid%2D19%3A%20Vaccines%20are%20highly%20effective%20in%20preventing%20deaths,from%20delta%20 variant%2C%20study%20indicates&text=The%20first%20countrywide%20study%20of,in%20preventing%20people%20from%20dying.
Agreed. April to September is a bit of cherry picking. Let's see how the vaxed in Scotland get through the Dark Winter.
It is very important to validate these early results in other settings and with a longer follow-up study.
originally posted by: GenerationGap
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: GenerationGap
originally posted by: ScepticScot
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: ScepticScot
Lol
No
Getting covid is better than taking experimental anything.
Number of deaths says otherwise.
Are you comparing non vaccinated to vaccinated deaths from February 2020 to today or July 2021 (Approx when US reached 50% vaxed) to today?
Or just list the studies you are using to formulate your position. But if it's the same one Brandon has been referring to since May, it's utter garbage, and don't bother.
Also, let's theorize that 75% of any heart related deaths above previous years averages are Covid 19 caused.
There are multiple studies showing vaccine effectiveness against dying from covid.
Here is a recent one.
www.bmj.com...#:~:text=News-,Covid%2D19%3A%20Vaccines%20are%20highly%20effective%20in%20preventing%20deaths,from%20delta%20 variant%2C%20study%20indicates&text=The%20first%20countrywide%20study%20of,in%20preventing%20people%20from%20dying.
Agreed. April to September is a bit of cherry picking. Let's see how the vaxed in Scotland get through the Dark Winter.
It is very important to validate these early results in other settings and with a longer follow-up study.
originally posted by: HawkeyeNation
Where are these studies being done? I'm just so confused right now.
originally posted by: Rich Z
originally posted by: chr0naut
originally posted by: SeaWorthy
Mean time most of the People have already had covid and now have natural immunity proven to be strong!
... if they didn't die.
... or like ATS member Grenade, catch it again (so much for that wonderfully effective 'natural immunity').
But, but, but! What about that herd immunity Fauci and others have been claiming is their goal? Doesn't reinfections sort of shoot that out of the water? Or have the goal posts moved yet again, and now the only way to save humanity is by having 200 percent vaccinated? Maybe 500 percent, depending on how many booster shots they will feel are needed over the course of the next few years. And I guess the definition of "unvaccinated" has mutated to include people who let their periodic booster shots lapse, so even today's anointed and privileged vaccinated can be cast back down to that dirtball earth as being unworthy of carrying a **passport** to a better lifestyle, eh?