Project Veritas reporters homes raided.

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: shaemac

Oh yes, I stand corrected, thanks. I"ts her ''diary'' that she claims was stolen and which is at the center of this controversy. With that accepted, my questions stand.

Your question is null and void because it is based on wrong information.
Try again.

a reply to: JinMI

Great. Then please inform me. No one else has given any other order of activity. She said her diary was stolen, Veritas published parts of it and the FBI went looking for evidence.

a reply to: shaemac

A woman claims her diary was stolen

A group publishes information gotten from that diary

Law enforcement investigates those who published that information

How is that wrong?

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: shaemac

A woman claims her diary was stolen

A group publishes information gotten from that diary

Law enforcement investigates those who published that information

How is that wrong?

Maybe because they tried to turn it over to the authorities and the person who wrote it and the declined to take possession for fear it would validate it’s contents.

I think back on the past 4 years when various MSM outlets reported stories based on confidential information from anonymous sources, almost on a weekly basis. Does anyone remember the FBI going after anyone who leaked this confidential information or raiding the "news" outlets that published it?

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
Is this the order of activity?

A woman reports her laptop stolen

A political action group publishes private information from that laptop indicating that they were in posession of that laptop.

Law enforcement exercises legal investigation into the possibility that those who published information from that lap top were the thieves that stole it.

Is that the order of how this is happening?

No this totally unrelated this is Ashley Biden's diary where among other things she alleged she took inappropriate showers with her Dad, you know the current President of the United States

FWIW I just found out it is being alleged she was 15 at the time.

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: JinMI

Great. Then please inform me. No one else has given any other order of activity. She said her diary was stolen, Veritas published parts of it and the FBI went looking for evidence.

The question is they have been saying the diary is fake, so why would the FBI raid over something that was fake? ergo it isn't fake and Joe may or may not have showered with his 15-year-old daughter, or Ashley made it up.

celebritynewsy.com...

The flack always gets thicker when you're directly over the target.

Understand who Project Veritas has exposed (i.e. which political "side"), and then the situation makes sense.l

a reply to: TerryMcGuire

Your BS "order of activity" is useless.

It's the "Gain of Function" that matters.

You can look it all up from your corner chair facing the wall 😃

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
a reply to: shaemac

A woman claims her diary was stolen

A group publishes information gotten from that diary

Law enforcement investigates those who published that information

How is that wrong?

It's not a Federal crime, if it is even a crime at all. Why the FBI and a Federal Attorney?