Another Conspiracy Confirmed! NIH admits gene alterations by COVID-19 vaccines

Yes, I said Vaccines because the study covered both inactivated viral vaccines as well as mRNA injections.

"scRNA-seq revealed dramatic alterations in gene expression of almost all immune cells after vaccination"

What did the researchers discover this means?

"...Mechanistically, we found that the spike protein localizes in the nucleus and inhibits DNA damage repair by impeding key DNA repair protein BRCA1 and 53BP1 recruitment to the damage site. Our findings reveal a potential molecular mechanism by which the spike protein might impede adaptive immunity and underscore the potential side effects of full-length spike-based vaccines."

So everyone who defended mRNA by saying it doesn't enter the nucleus, whoops! You screwed up. Maybe you can go edit your old posts if you hurry.

So, decreased immunity within those who received any type of COVID-19 vaccine. So look for a huge spike in cancers in the next few years.

Stay with me here. If there are going to be a huge number of cancer patients, wouldn't there be a corresponding demand for cancer treatment drugs? I'm glad you asked! Here are the top 20 manufacturers of cancer drugs:

1. AstraZeneca
2. Bristol Myers Squibb
3. Novartis
4. Roche
5. Amgen
6. Pfizer
7. Sanofi
8. Abbvie
9. Takeda
10. Gilead
11. Incyte
12. Bayer
13. Lilly
14. BeiGene
15. Johnson&Johnson
16. GSK
17. 3SBionic
18. Merck
19. Daiichi-Sankyo
20. Astellas

See any familiar names? (Yes I know Bayer doesn't make a vaccine, they just own Monsanto that genetically modifies your food)

So, what if the goal isn't to profit from booster shots, but to profit from the coming explosion of cancer patients?

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

No a chirp from the usual government bootlickers?
The silence is almost deafening from the three or four usual suspects,you know who you are.
What's the difference between conspiracy theory and fact?
About six months,boom boom.

a reply to: SentientBunnySuit
Don't forget all the new AIDS patients, oh they've got drugs for that too.

originally posted by: SentientBunnySuit
Yes, I said Vaccines because the study covered both inactivated viral vaccines as well as mRNA injections.

"scRNA-seq revealed dramatic alterations in gene expression of almost all immune cells after vaccination"

What did the researchers discover this means?

"...Mechanistically, we found that the spike protein localizes in the nucleus and inhibits DNA damage repair by impeding key DNA repair protein BRCA1 and 53BP1 recruitment to the damage site. Our findings reveal a potential molecular mechanism by which the spike protein might impede adaptive immunity and underscore the potential side effects of full-length spike-based vaccines."

So everyone who defended mRNA by saying it doesn't enter the nucleus, whoops! You screwed up. Maybe you can go edit your old posts if you hurry.

So, decreased immunity within those who received any type of COVID-19 vaccine. So look for a huge spike in cancers in the next few years.

Stay with me here. If there are going to be a huge number of cancer patients, wouldn't there be a corresponding demand for cancer treatment drugs? I'm glad you asked! Here are the top 20 manufacturers of cancer drugs:

1. AstraZeneca
2. Bristol Myers Squibb
3. Novartis
4. Roche
5. Amgen
6. Pfizer
7. Sanofi
8. Abbvie
9. Takeda
10. Gilead
11. Incyte
12. Bayer
13. Lilly
14. BeiGene
15. Johnson&Johnson
16. GSK
17. 3SBionic
18. Merck
19. Daiichi-Sankyo
20. Astellas

See any familiar names? (Yes I know Bayer doesn't make a vaccine, they just own Monsanto that genetically modifies your food)

So, what if the goal isn't to profit from booster shots, but to profit from the coming explosion of cancer patients?

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

You totally misread the article. It says:

"A total of 11 healthy adult volunteers of both sexes, aged 24–47 years, with a BMI of 21.5–30.0 kg/m², were enrolled in this study (Fig. ​(Fig.1a1a and Supplementary Tables S1 and S2). SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (Vero Cell), inactivated (Beijing Institute of Biological Products Co. Ltd), was administered intramuscularly into the deltoid."

There were only 11 subjects in the study and they all received one of the "traditional" weakened or inactivated virus vaccines that all of the antivaxxers around here seem to love because they are "real" vaccines. No mRNA vaccines (Moderna, Pfizer) or adenovirus vector vaccines (Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca) were used in this study.

Unsurprisingly, when a weakened or inactivated virus vaccine is administered, it produces a response very similar to getting the actual infection:

"Here, we report, besides generation of neutralizing antibodies, consistent alterations in hemoglobin A1c, serum sodium and potassium levels, coagulation profiles, and renal functions in healthy volunteers after vaccination with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Similar changes had also been reported in COVID-19 patients, suggesting that vaccination mimicked an infection."

Our findings reveal a potential molecular mechanism by which the spike protein might impede adaptive immunity and underscore the potential side effects of full-length spike-based vaccines.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

(Bolding added)

a reply to: SentientBunnySuit

Sorry, you are still wrong and we are still right. No mRNA vaccine was used and no changes were made to DNA. The genes did not change, only their expression.

a reply to: 1947boomer

It should be super easy to prove me wrong, just make sure you and 100m other CCP science fair fans don't get cancer.

NIH (Fauci) is under the CDC, which is under HHS, which is under President Biden. Biden proudly says the buck stops with him. He's responsible for all.

Keep that in mind as additional crimes against humanity committed by his people, come to light.

a reply to: SentientBunnySuit

I think you cited the wrong article.

Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (Vero Cell) (China Biotechnology Group Corporation) was administered intramuscularly into the deltoid. 

This is what the article says was administered to the test group, which IS NOT an mRNA type vaccine. It is a whole virus particle that has been inactivated which is absolutely NOT the same as an mRNA particle.

I would however like to see the article from which you derived the claims in the OP.

originally posted by: balanc3
a reply to: SentientBunnySuit

I think you cited the wrong article.

Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine (Vero Cell) (China Biotechnology Group Corporation) was administered intramuscularly into the deltoid. 

This is what the article says was administered to the test group, which IS NOT an mRNA type vaccine. It is a whole virus particle that has been inactivated which is absolutely NOT the same as an mRNA particle.

I would however like to see the article from which you derived the claims in the OP.

www.mdpi.com...

originally posted by: SentientBunnySuit
"...Mechanistically, we found that the spike protein localizes in the nucleus and inhibits DNA damage repair by impeding key DNA repair protein BRCA1 and 53BP1 recruitment to the damage site. Our findings reveal a potential molecular mechanism by which the spike protein might impede adaptive immunity and underscore the potential side effects of full-length spike-based vaccines."

So everyone who defended mRNA by saying it doesn't enter the nucleus, whoops! You screwed up. Maybe you can go edit your old posts if you hurry.

I can't find that quote in the link you posted.

a reply to: queenofswords

What you cited points to the damage caused by the Actual sarscov2 spike protein, and actually cautions against vaccine efforts that would include gene sequences that will produce the entire spike protein structure.

Of importance is that neither pfizer/moderna use the entire spike protein sequence and they don't enter the cell nucleus where the interference to adaptive immune response is coming from.

The Janssen, astrazeneca shots use viral vectors to deliver their genetic info into cells. That genetic info is also partial info for making a spike protein.

Large-scale COVID-19 vaccinations are currently underway in many countries in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we report, besides generation of neutralizing antibodies, consistent alterations in hemoglobin A1c, serum sodium and potassium levels, coagulation profiles, and renal functions in healthy volunteers after vaccination with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Similar changes had also been reported in COVID-19 patients, suggesting that vaccination mimicked an infection.Single-cell mRNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) before and 28 days after the first inoculation also revealed consistent alterations in gene expression of many different immune cell types.

This article actually highlights a significant danger of covid, which is that if you get really sick and beat covid, then your immune system may be too weak to adapt to other infection.

And secondly it suggests that vaccine development should avoid using the full spike protein sequence, which available data suggests is how the current covid shots are being formulated.


"In contrast, our data provide valuable details on the involvement of spike protein subunits in DNA damage repair, indicating that full–length spike–based vaccines may inhibit the recombination of V(D)J in B cells, which is also consistent with a recent study that a full–length spike–based vaccine induced lower antibody titers compared to the RBD–based vaccine"

I feel further assured to believe covid is a bad mofo, and it's best not to catch that particular pathogen.


The articles cited do not claim that vaccines Do Any of the harm nor express any of the dangerous properties. They are In fact cautionary about how these technologies should be developed. You are misquoting or misrepresenting the information they contain.

a reply to: SeaWorthy

The article when read fully includes the part about using an inactivated sarscov2 virus, a whole real virus, like found in traditional vaccines, see boomers post before mine.

a reply to: SentientBunnySuit

great find

it is a bioweapon, quite clearly

a reply to: SentientBunnySuit

This study doesn’t look at the effect of any vaccine specifically.

It’s an invitro study looking at how the virus effects the cell.

It’s all done in the lab on cell cultures.

It does tell us about how the vaccines work though since the vaccines whether mRNA, or Adenovirus based, or the novavax or any of the vaccines on the market or in production, all work by producing spike which goes systemic.

What we didn’t know was the exact effects of how the spike works mechanistically.

This should be incredibly worrisome, though not surprising since it’s been well understood that the spike is pathogenic.

adjuvant

Functionalized graphene oxide serves as a novel vaccine nano-adjuvant for robust stimulation of cellular immunity

January 2016

Nanoscale 8(6)

DOI:10.1039/C5NR09208F

🙏❤
eta
trade one disease for another

a reply to: balanc3

This article actually highlights a significant danger of covid, which is that if you get really sick and beat covid, then your immune system may be too weak to adapt to other infection.

Is that to say the Virus will cause you body to be unable to repair its own DNA after catching the Virus and if so does this in anyway add credence to the idea that the virus was spliced with aids

a reply to: balanc3

The spike is the spike. If you are young and health your chance of having systemic spike are very low. It only happens with severe covid (ICU,death)

If you are vaccinated your chances of having systemic spike are 100%. No matter your age.

This study looks at spike. It is not from the virus exactly since they created in in the lab.

[16]. The NSP1, NSP9, NSP13, NSP14, NSP16, spike, and nucleocapsid proteins were first synthesized with codon optimization and then cloned into a mammalian expression vector p

That is more similar to vaccination than it is to infection. Where they produce spike on its own not as a whole virus.