Possible Proof of Base on the Moon

What if we have a base on the moon?

What if we didn't stop going to the moon secretly

What if the moon was being prepared for commercial use

I think it's a "base" or "rocks from crater" from asteroid...

Opinionuated possible proof

Either or in my opinion


The first picture is a 3d image of what a base could look like .


The second picture is real I think

A lot of people claim someone has a base on the moon. Mystery lights and other things raise suspicion.

From that first picture, the earth wouldn't look nearly so big.
Not even close.
There's no way to make up that difference without photo editing, so that photo is fake.

a reply to: Mystery00

Lunar lava tubes would be a great place to hide a base.

Well where is that crater on the moon? Let's look at some other pictures of the crater.

a reply to: Mystery00

Sorry...you mentioned...

Proof? Is this a find waldo sort of thing? Hidden proof?

I had a very realistic dream years ago, long before I ever heard the hollow moon theories. I remember it clearly. A very large hatch opened, and I saw it was hollow. Someone was inside. The bases would be inside where its safe from meteor/asteroid strikes.

I think about that dream every time I see a full moon. I wonder who is inside, and what activities are going on there.

originally posted by: lordcomac
From that first picture, the earth wouldn't look nearly so big.
Not even close.
There's no way to make up that difference without photo editing, so that photo is fake.

No, that image could be done. You would have to be a distance away from the habatat and use a telephoto lens. Not saying that image is a real photo but your reason for it not to be is not logical.

It would be quite similar to this photo but the other way around. anthonylynchphotography.com...

a reply to: Mystery00

The ancient ( Hindu I think ) text's say the moon was towed into place

People from the CIA Remote Viewing experiments were able to travel to Mars and stuff with their consciousness and even go back in time. It is said there are machines and bases on Mars and that at some point in time it was inhabited.

The thing is, there already was photo evidence of certain structures, and these remote viewers were able to identify these things even though they were not aware of it before experiencing it.

originally posted by: Mystery00
What if we have a base on the moon?

What if we didn't stop going to the moon secretly

What if the moon was being prepared for commercial use

It seems like you're assuming that if there was one, then it must be ours. Maybe there is one, but it's not ours.

In the 2nd image, what do they mean by "Mars on the Moon"?



If I was going to build one, I'd put it on the other side, where it would never be viewable from Earth.

no such thing as p[ossible proof

a reply to: Mystery00

Could be, but we have more then one picture of those craters and I bet the answer is just a complex crater.

Craters with central peaks are known as complex craters, you'll also notice simple craters, which don't have central peaks.
Complex craters were formed by higher energy impacts.

The impactor didn't actually survive the impact; instead, its kinetic energy produced an explosion that gouged out the crater and shocked the material around and below the new crater. After the explosion, the material around the crater rebounded.

The floor moved up while material around the wall moved inward. The interactions of the shock waves produced that central peak.

I would say the contours are so wrong, it they need a new printer. However I wouldn't dismiss the idea of it at all.

originally posted by: lordcomac
From that first picture, the earth wouldn't look nearly so big.
Not even close.
There's no way to make up that difference without photo editing, so that photo is fake.

There is a perfectly legitimate way to "make up that difference." What if you were one of the people at that supposed base and you wanted to secretly photograph it without being seen. You would use a camera with a long lens from far off, zoom in on the base and everything else would be bigger as well. Including the size of the earth.

You're obviously not a photographer like me.

originally posted by: lordcomac
From that first picture, the earth wouldn't look nearly so big.
Not even close.
There's no way to make up that difference without photo editing, so that photo is fake.

Of course the photo is fake. It's an artistic representation of the concept, not an actual photo of it on the moon.

a reply to: game over man
The craters are Rozhdestvenskiy and Hermite. See:
ESA page

The craters are so close to the edge of what we can see from Earth that if you want other pics then you will have to look on websites for other luna orbiters.

originally posted by: visitedbythem
I had a very realistic dream years ago, long before I ever heard the hollow moon theories. I remember it clearly. A very large hatch opened, and I saw it was hollow. Someone was inside. The bases would be inside where its safe from meteor/asteroid strikes.

I think about that dream every time I see a full moon. I wonder who is inside, and what activities are going on there.

Interesting. Looks like the hatch is missing...

Looks more like a rat hole if you ask me...

Technically called a "Lunar Pit"..

a reply to: Mystery00

Based on the language and available footage... no.

Just another cash-grab endeavor in my opinion.

a reply to: Spacespider

Isn't that speculative?

Do we have recorded evidence of a complex crater being created on the moon?
(Photo, video, firsthand credible witness) ?