It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Expert challenges trial methodology.

page: 1
17

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 4 2021 @ 01:46 PM
link   
This blog needs more eyeballs.

aditibhargava-sfo.medium.com...

Why were trials for both of the major players effectively ended after only 2 months of study? The control group was rolled into the vaccine group after only a number of weeks. When was the bar ever so low? Randomized control trials only work when there is a control. Both studies showed equal or greater deaths in the vaccine arm due to heart and stroke issues after only a few weeks. Did the vaccine reduce COVID deaths by 100%? Yes. Did it increase heart attacks by 500%? Also yes. Many touting the efficacy, while completely ignoring the shoddy way these trials were constructed. There is no way to recieve a safety signal.



posted on Nov, 4 2021 @ 02:08 PM
link   
from your source and I couldn't agree more this is the science we should be listening to


Natural immunity is far more superior than COVID-19 vaccines against re-infection with other emerging variants. Vaccines maybe vital for high-risk population, but not for the otherwise healthy. Given that COVID-19 vaccine safety and efficacy is still debatable, the decision to mandate vaccines and even think about vaccine passports is ridiculous and absurd.

The findings of this study showed that in people previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and who were unvaccinated or vaccine naïve, compared to fully vaccinated individuals, their naturally acquired immunity was ~13 times more protective than vaccine-induced immunity. The two groups had over 32,000 people and in the study period, a total of 257 cases were reported (a whopping 0.79%!!). Of these symptomatic COVID cases, 92.6% were in fully vaccinated and only 7.4% were in previously infected individuals who were not vaccinated.




edit on Thu Nov 4 2021 by DontTreadOnMe because: EX TAGS IMPORTANT: Using Content From Other Websites on ATS



posted on Nov, 9 2021 @ 11:32 AM
link   
Absolutely, and the below, when combined with the now proven fact that natural/acquired immunity from SARS-Cov-1 is essentially lifelong (17 yrs and going strong as of the time of the published study), I think clearly shows that natural/acquired immunity to SARS-Cov-2 will likewise be essentially lifelong - especially when compared to the inadequate flash in the pan' partial immunity provided by these jabs..


originally posted by: putnam6
from your source and I couldn't agree more this is the science we should be listening to


Natural immunity is far more superior than COVID-19 vaccines against re-infection with other emerging variants. Vaccines maybe vital for high-risk population, but not for the otherwise healthy. Given that COVID-19 vaccine safety and efficacy is still debatable, the decision to mandate vaccines and even think about vaccine passports is ridiculous and absurd.

The findings of this study showed that in people previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 and who were unvaccinated or vaccine naïve, compared to fully vaccinated individuals, their naturally acquired immunity was ~13 times more protective than vaccine-induced immunity. The two groups had over 32,000 people and in the study period, a total of 257 cases were reported (a whopping 0.79%!!). Of these symptomatic COVID cases, 92.6% were in fully vaccinated and only 7.4% were in previously infected individuals who were not vaccinated.




edit on Thu Nov 4 2021 by DontTreadOnMe because: EX TAGS IMPORTANT: Using Content From Other Websites on ATS



 
17

log in

join