The gene serum is a satanic baptism: the Deep State and Deep Church

a reply to: yuppa
Thank you, and very well put.

a reply to: CharlesT

Shame about the lack of any sorts of credible evidence of the tangible sorts to back up his spurious religious mumbo jumbo rhetoric all the same.

Where did he put those?

originally posted by: FatherLukeDuke

originally posted by: CharlesT


It is the most profound conspiricy that could be immagined

Well, you said it, not me...

Splitting hairs, aren't you.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: CharlesT

Shame about the lack of any sorts of credible evidence of the tangible sorts to back up his spurious religious mumbo jumbo rhetoric all the same.

Where did he put those?

Dude, all you have to do is open your eyes to see the proof. You are throwing mud on the wall to see if it sticks.

a reply to: CharlesT

Naw mate all you have to do is present proof of the tangible sorts.

You cannot do so anymore than Yuppa can unfortunately.

My eyes are open and you are presenting exactly sweet nothing in the way of factual evidence to support your claims.

You see belief does not equal action and belief and behaviour don't always add up, hence there is you organised religious practice in spades.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: CharlesT

Naw mate all you have to do is present proof of the tangible sorts.

You cannot do so anymore than Yuppa can unfortunately.

My eyes are open and you are presenting exactly sweet nothing to support your claims.

You see belief does not equal action and belief and behaviour don't always add up, hence there is you organised religious practice in spades.

No, all you have to do is prove me wrong. All you have been saying is you are wrong, without proving me wrong.

I doubt you even watched it or read the transcripts, did you?

You don't have to prove me right or wrong. Your task is to prove the bishop wrong. He is the one espousing this conspiricy, not me.

a reply to: CharlesT

That's not how it work CharlesT. LoL

The onus and duty lies with the one making the claims to present evidence to support such.

The burden of proof is on your doorstep mate and you have been here long enough to know that.

Your Bishop is not presenting any sort of tangible evidence god exists nether.

Hitchens's razor mate which declares that "what may be asserted without evidence, may be dismissed without evidence."

"I doubt you even watched it or read the transcripts, did you?"

The audio is horrendous(problems with sinking)and the article in a foreign language, google translate helped there, which part of the article do you care to discuss?

a reply to: andy06shake
For starters, I didn't make the claims. I just offered up the video for discussion. That makes me liable to answer every baited hook someone posts here?

You and I have had an entertaining run going here, haven't we?

Actually, it has been quite entertaining. LOL
You certainly are dedicated and persistent. LOL

It's been fun. LOL

a reply to: CharlesT

Like i suggest CharlesT its just banter and debate, no hard feelings.

And you or your Bishop still lack tangible evidence to support the existence of your Abrahamic God never mind the rest.

Aye its quite fun i suppose.

a reply to: andy06shake

Each to his own. Have a good day.

a reply to: CharlesT

Cheers, not to bad so far.

Need to go pick up my little one from his Halloween Disco soon.

You have yourself a good day also.

a reply to: andy06shake

Believe it or not, I don't mind interactions of this sort. I think it helps keep the mind sharp. Or at least, slows the decay.

a reply to: CharlesT

I believe you.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: yuppa

Prove where God is please?

Also prove he is omnipresent and omniscient.

For all you know the big dude is limited by the speed of light just like the rest of the universe who you suppose he created.

And its you siting outside of Human understanding of time yuppa. LoL

Your on Earth mate not any other location in the universe, same with the Men who wrote both Bibles.

Proof mate, its what you are after and lack in spades.

Same with your vaccine rhetoric being the mark of the beast garbage or your we got cheated out an election nonsense.

You got squat, aside from a polished rife and longing for revolution.

See you explanations are hardly that, but simple opinion, and not even your own considering religion has conditioned you to entertain such notions without one iota of real proof.

And the band played on.

Personally I did not believe the vax is the mark. I was replying to another poster about that.
How do you prove something if you lack the technology to do so? You could say that the way things work in the universe is the proof of a intelligent creator.

a reply to: yuppa

Are you going to design technology to prove the existence of a creator?

Personally, the universe being of such scale and size, i don't ever imagine we will create or develop the science and technology that will allow us to understand but a fraction of the grand scheme of it all.

You can say whatever you please Yuppa but that does not make it proof just opinion without actual evidence to support such.

As to our universe, it may simply turn out to be one of many, or even infinite amount, or of the holographic nature.

Religion will never determine such all the same, but science and technology might just tick some of the boxes.

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus

originally posted by: chr0naut
There is a genetic imprint that indicates that at some recent time (on a 'deep-time' frame), that the human species was reduced to very few matriarchal ancestors. This theory was expounded in the book "The Seven Daughters of Eve" by the geneticist Bryan Sykes.

The Toba catastrophe is postulated to have taken place at least 50,000 years ago, well before any of this Noah nonsense allegedly happened.

Any attempt to try and explain this wholly impossible tale with science demonstrates extremely flawed thinking. Magic boats, magic men, magic floods and magic animals aren't real.

If the flood story were taken to be an account by contemporaneous observers of a local flood that persisted for some time, then a literal reading, taking the limitations of the observer into account, and possible oral transmission of original story, would not be so unfeasible. The flood story's writer (assumedly Moses, which would have been thousands of years afterwards), was also clearly trying to make a moral point, or explanation, for what is in the account.

It is the interpretation that the people in the account had knowledge of more than just their locality, and of the total number of species on the planet, that is flawed. None of the people involved were 'magic' or did anything supernatural. None of the animals did anything supernatural. The only supernatural things in the account are all attributed to God.

We do have examples of zoos and other collections together of animals so perhaps someone at the time thought that a collection of various animals was all that existed in the world?

It is only particular interpretations of the account, that go beyond the text of the story itself, that are a such a stretch of credulity.

originally posted by: XipeTotex

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: XipeTotex
a reply to: chr0naut
I know i am insane.

I bet you still believe you are a sane person. That was/is your first mistake.

I am not insane. I have a very balanced and rational outlook on the world, and I know it.

Yeah i bet, here you are debating with an online person(who already admitted his insanity and now also talks about oneself in the third person) about how the new vax is or is not satanic. On a conspiracy website.

Hey give me your address so i can send you a medal for being the most sane, logical and balanced person here.

I couldn't do that. It would remove all the drama and mystery.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: yuppa

Are you going to design technology to prove the existence of a creator?

Personally, the universe being of such scale and size, i don't ever imagine we will create or develop the science and technology that will allow us to understand but a fraction of the grand scheme of it all.

You can say whatever you please Yuppa but that does not make it proof just opinion without actual evidence to support such.

As to our universe, it may simply turn out to be one of many, or even infinite amount, or of the holographic nature.

Religion will never determine such all the same, but science and technology might just tick some of the boxes.

Your opinion is as valid as mine.Can you prove you are alive 100 percent? can you prove Evolution 100 percent? no you cannot. Evolution is a THEORY. Until its fact 100 percent you can be wrong.
And seriously a holographic universe? who created that ?

a reply to: yuppa

"Cogito, ergo sum" Yuppa or "I think, therefore I am".

I can state that is the case.

Evolution, depending on context, is both a fact and theory.

You see it's an incontrovertible fact that organisms have changed(evolved), during the history of life on Earth.

As to the universe being holographic, it's a possibility, and once we are able to resolve and measure the individual Planck length we may be able determine if the holographic principle holds weight.

As to who created the universe it may very well be ouroboros in nature with no beginning or end thus the need for a creator immaterial.

As to me being wrong, that's another possibility, would not be the first time, sure as hell wont be the last. LoL

This isn't the mark of the beast. Nor is it the beast system.

God Damn evangelical rubbish and propaganda.
Its utter rubbish and not even a twisting of scripture, but a complete misrepresentation and (lack)understanding of it.

These people who started these nutter evangelical churches, who have duped millions, are living in ultra mega mansions with private jets on call and mega yachts.

While you, the idiots who believe them, struggle.

Keep giving your worldly possessions to those deceiving you lol.

originally posted by: St Udio
a reply to: CharlesT

you are brave to publish as you did... may you weather the guaranteed storm of ridicule and scorn


getting a jab by deceit or trickery does not necessarily condemn you to the group who willingly accept the 'mark' of those who swear allegiance to the Beast System

after all, sometime in the next several years, but after the Beast-Man-of-perdition is 'revealed'...the 2 witnesses and the 144,000 will all be 'sealed' from the 'gene-mutation' serum that many of us were conned into accepting...

----------> but by then the 'trans-human program of altering the human genome' will be much further along than a mere 'vaxx' against COVID/cv & other gene manipulation viruses