Here is Why Democrat Leaders Tried to Quietly Rush Through Bidens $5 Trillion Spending Package.

Friday, October 15, 2021

Thank-goodness fighting between Progressive, Moderate, and Conservative Democrats has derailed the plan by Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, and Chuck Schumer, to put the massive "Build Back Better" $5 Trillion spending bills into law quickly, before Americans could find out what was in them.

Here is why Democrat leaders wanted these bills passed and signed into law quickly, and why none of them, including President Biden himself, publicly promoted this massive "Build Back Better" expenditure. At a beginning price tag of $5 Trillion, the cost is more than the entire annual ($4.8 Trillion) budget of the United States of America!

Buried in the 2,465 pages are numerous billion-dollar grants to unnamed community organizations, for promoting “community engagement,” providing “support and advice,” and “creating equitable civic infrastructure.”

Translation: Your taxpayer dollars will fund the payrolls of left-wing advocacy groups between elections. In return, they become the campaign army staffing phone banks, harvesting ballots, and escorting people to the polls on Election Day.

More at: nypost.com...

-AND-

1.) Funds abortions by ignoring bipartisan Hyde Amendment protections

2.) Props up the Green New Deal with $630 billion at the expense of small businesses

3.) Imposes $2.1 trillion in tax increases on American families and job creators

4.) Gives tax breaks and handouts to the wealthy and corrupt

5.) Creates a $250 tax deduction for union dues, putting more money into the pockets of union bosses.

6.) Creates a new surveillance program that allows the IRS to monitor and track every single bank transaction made without a warrant, permission, or limit.

7.) Provides $20 billion for the National Climate Bank to send kickbacks to radical environmentalists.

8.) Provides FAKE NEWS organizations with up to 750 employees with a tax cut at a time when their readership has declined due to their liberal bias.

9.) Impedes and bans domestic energy and mineral production, increasing our dependencies on resources supplied by OPEC, Russia, and China.

10.) Includes provisions that promote amnesty for more than 8 million illegal immigrants.

Source: www.gop.gov...

-AND-

A Congressional study committee has identified 42 major provisions buried in the $5 Trillion "Build Back Better" package that will damage every single hard working American in some way. Here are 7 of the 42...

Perpetuates labor shortage: Continues welfare benefits without work requirements for able-bodied adults without dependents at a time where there are 10.1 million job openings—more openings than there are people looking for work.

Commissions a climate police: Democrats stuffed $8 billion into the bill to commission a cabal of federally funded climate police called the Civilian Climate Corps (CCC) who will conduct progressive activism on taxpayers’ dime (pages 8, 21, and 926).

Pushes Green New Deal in our public schools: Requires funding for school construction be used largely on enrollment diversity and Green New Deal agenda items (page 55).

Pushes Green New Deal in our universities: Democrats include a $10 billion “environmental justice” higher education slush fund to indoctrinate college students and advance Green New Deal policies (page 1,935).

Forces faith-based child care providers out: The bill blocks the ability of many faith-based providers from participating in the childcare system and will lead to many of their closures (page 280).

Hurts small and in-home daycares: Requires pre-K staff to have a college degree. (page 303)

Includes new incentives for illegal immigration: Illegal immigrants will be eligible to take advantage of Democrats’ new ‘free’ college entitlement (page 92) as well be eligible for additional student aid (page 147) and the enhanced child tax credit (page 1,946).

Full Report, with each page reference "clickable" to take you directly to the provision: rsc-banks.house.gov...

President Biden and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi think we're stupid enough to believe them when they tell us that the $5 Trillion expenditure will actually cost $0 dollars.

Biden says: Hey morons, the cost is $0 Nada Nothing!: www.washingtonexaminer.com...

With President Joe Biden's "Build Back Better" set of spending packages still stalled, while individuals in Congress "negotiate" with leaders to make adjustments, now is the time for Americans to learn of the main expenditures, and voice anything you're unhappy about to your representatives in Congress.

If you find additional negatives in the bill, or new negatives added during the current "negotiations", please add them to this thread. I'll do the same.

-CareWeMust

I made this D&D style alignment chart for the nine kingdoms of partisan politics. Am I doing it right?

a reply to: TzarChasm

I feel its OK to forcefully "remove" evil people at the top who are damaging our country.

In what category does that place me?

a reply to: TzarChasm

Show us what a hand full of progressive promises looks like.

a reply to: visitedbythem

Nice Dr. Seuss..and very accurate. What's with so many people calling Joe Biden "Brandon"? I missed the memo.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: visitedbythem

Nice Dr. Seuss..and very accurate. What's with so many people calling Joe Biden "Brandon"? I missed the memo.

a reply to: carewemust

I would tentatively classify that statement as chaotic good, which is by definition illegal and morally questionable. Or to phrase it another way, the end justifies the means.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: visitedbythem

Nice Dr. Seuss..and very accurate. What's with so many people calling Joe Biden "Brandon"? I missed the memo.

It's a NASCAR meme. A reporter tried to spin the chant in a different direction and now it's a sardonic code phrase. Brandons everywhere are simultaneously encouraged and baffled by the attention.

originally posted by: visitedbythem
a reply to: TzarChasm

Show us what a hand full of progressive promises looks like.

40 acres and a mule.

a reply to: visitedbythem

Thank-you! Now I remember reading an ATS post about NBC News saying the crowd was really chanting "Lets go Brandon", instead of "Phuck Joe Biden". Most of the MSM news outlets are controlled by domestic terrorist executives.

a reply to: visitedbythem

Don't let the dems and the media sucker you, or anyone else, into adopting the "Lets go Brandon" mantra!!! Not even as a joke!

This is exactly what the dems want!

Then, they can turn it into a rally cry for Biden!

We should all correct anyone who says this by saying...No, it's 'F# Joe Biden'! It's not anything different than that!!"

Remember...it was the MSM who coined this term to begin with as a diversion.

a reply to: carewemust

That's why we have Bitchute, GWP, RSBN, and my personal favorite, the Onion. It used to be Weekly World News but the radical left shut them down because the competition made them nervous.


a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

You're absolutely right. It's classic redirection, and the joke is on us.

originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: carewemust

I would tentatively classify that statement as chaotic good, which is by definition illegal and morally questionable. Or to phrase it another way, the end justifies the means.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: visitedbythem

Nice Dr. Seuss..and very accurate. What's with so many people calling Joe Biden "Brandon"? I missed the memo.

Since true, blind, unbiased justice is so fleeting these days, if the "end" saves society, radical measures to achieve that goal are acceptable. Sort of like nuking Japan twice.

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

Bingo! Anything that waters down, or distracts from the horrible evil callous sinister person named JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, should be discarded from our spoken and written references to him.

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: carewemust

I would tentatively classify that statement as chaotic good, which is by definition illegal and morally questionable. Or to phrase it another way, the end justifies the means.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: visitedbythem

Nice Dr. Seuss..and very accurate. What's with so many people calling Joe Biden "Brandon"? I missed the memo.

Since true, blind, unbiased justice is so fleeting these days, if the "end" saves society, radical measures to achieve that goal are acceptable. Sort of like nuking Japan twice.

Calm down there Tyler Durden. Or do you prefer V?

There's a fine line between outplaying the criminals and becoming them.

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: carewemust

I would tentatively classify that statement as chaotic good, which is by definition illegal and morally questionable. Or to phrase it another way, the end justifies the means.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: visitedbythem

Nice Dr. Seuss..and very accurate. What's with so many people calling Joe Biden "Brandon"? I missed the memo.

Since true, blind, unbiased justice is so fleeting these days, if the "end" saves society, radical measures to achieve that goal are acceptable. Sort of like nuking Japan twice.

Calm down there Tyler Durden. Or do you prefer V?

There's a fine line between outplaying the criminals and becoming them.

Are the modern rules for war different than they were 80 years ago? If authorities are forcing individuals to accept being injected with drugs that can kill, that's a declared war, is it not?

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: carewemust

I would tentatively classify that statement as chaotic good, which is by definition illegal and morally questionable. Or to phrase it another way, the end justifies the means.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: visitedbythem

Nice Dr. Seuss..and very accurate. What's with so many people calling Joe Biden "Brandon"? I missed the memo.

Since true, blind, unbiased justice is so fleeting these days, if the "end" saves society, radical measures to achieve that goal are acceptable. Sort of like nuking Japan twice.

Calm down there Tyler Durden. Or do you prefer V?

There's a fine line between outplaying the criminals and becoming them.

Are the modern rules for war different than they were 80 years ago? If authorities are forcing individuals to accept being injected with drugs that can kill, that's a declared war, is it not?

No one is being forced. You may have to choose between your current occupation or your personal liberty. There are several industries I know of personally that don't require vaccination to earn a living. The vast majority of society continues to conduct their daily business without being accosted by law enforcement to present their documentation, or being rounded up into vehicles for transportation to camps, or being executed in the streets, or being bombarded with propaganda about reporting your unvaccinated neighbors to the military for immediate arrest. Those are the general conditions that come to mind when I ask myself what's a reasonable basis for war.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: TzarChasm

I feel its OK to forcefully "remove" evil people at the top who are damaging our country.

In what category does that place me?

Well, it would likely depend on whether you are in the Trump era or the Biden era at the time you would make such a recommendation.

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: carewemust

originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: carewemust

I would tentatively classify that statement as chaotic good, which is by definition illegal and morally questionable. Or to phrase it another way, the end justifies the means.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: visitedbythem

Nice Dr. Seuss..and very accurate. What's with so many people calling Joe Biden "Brandon"? I missed the memo.

Since true, blind, unbiased justice is so fleeting these days, if the "end" saves society, radical measures to achieve that goal are acceptable. Sort of like nuking Japan twice.

Calm down there Tyler Durden. Or do you prefer V?

There's a fine line between outplaying the criminals and becoming them.

Are the modern rules for war different than they were 80 years ago? If authorities are forcing individuals to accept being injected with drugs that can kill, that's a declared war, is it not?

No one is being forced. You may have to choose between your current occupation or your personal liberty. There are several industries I know of personally that don't require vaccination to earn a living. The vast majority of society continues to conduct their daily business without being accosted by law enforcement to present their documentation, or being rounded up into vehicles for transportation to camps, or being executed in the streets, or being bombarded with propaganda about reporting your unvaccinated neighbors to the military for immediate arrest. Those are the general conditions that come to mind when I ask myself what's a reasonable basis for war.

The Biden administration is pressing the FDA to make Covid vaccine drugs ready for injection into our 5 to 11 year-olds before Christmas.

If the Biden Administration causes school systems to mandate these injections, expect a forced turnover of our government.

A decent article out of Atlanta that tries to explain in real-life terms, what's in the $3.5 Trillion portion of the $5 Trillion overall package.

One example:

Under this scenario, a mom who has a baby next year would have 12 weeks of paid maternity leave, free-to-low cost child care to go back to work, free preschool for that child, and $3,600 per year in tax credits to pay for the remaining costs of having a child.

Full Article: www.ajc.com...