It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: sighbul
a reply to: tanstaafl
Normally you'd be correct, but sadly not in the case of mRNA vaccines for Covid.
boriquagato.substack.com...
And the consequences going forward will be truly catastrophic.
I put those words into Google, and did a search for them, along with "ardern".
I got no results at all.
The video taken from the NZ Channel 1 Today Show, and both linked an quoted in the article, has what she said.
But I already knew that before you posted your original reply, because I actually read the article and watched the video prior to you providing the link to the misleading article.
I really get annoyed that people use misquotes and plain fabrications to support their arguments. Much reporting, and especially that from US news sources, is biased and 'spun' to support specific viewpoints. It hold little adherence to the truth, and is usually revealed if you are a bit skeptical and actually check into what an article purports.
originally posted by: myselfaswell
originally posted by: MDDoxs
a reply to: anonentity
Lol based on the numbers presented, it was a more deadly period of time for those unvaccinated. 65,000 unvaccinated dead, or 37%.
Not sure what the article is trying to conclude here
Pretty straight forward;
30,305 people died within 21 days of having a Covid-19 Vaccine in England during the first 6 months of 2021.
And that you find this in any way funny indicates to me that you have serious mental health issues that need professional help.
originally posted by: puzzled2
a reply to: chr0naut
SO you said
I put those words into Google, and did a search for them, along with "ardern".
I got no results at all.
SO I put the link in for you
Now you say
The video taken from the NZ Channel 1 Today Show, and both linked an quoted in the article, has what she said.
But I already knew that before you posted your original reply, because I actually read the article and watched the video prior to you providing the link to the misleading article.
Seems strange you had the link, you had the words being spoken in a video, coming out of her mouth and you denied the existence and want more.
Why deny finding the source of the quote?
Why not link to the video and express your opinion on it and the reporting?
Then you have the nerve to say
I really get annoyed that people use misquotes and plain fabrications to support their arguments. Much reporting, and especially that from US news sources, is biased and 'spun' to support specific viewpoints. It hold little adherence to the truth, and is usually revealed if you are a bit skeptical and actually check into what an article purports.
So saying you couldn't find anything is what? "plain fabrications to support your arguments."
Stay on your high horse all you want but you are just the same as those you claim to annoy you.