Magnetisation of Graphene Oxide and applications for mind control - SPIONS, PEG and Magneto in vaxs

Since a lot of people are discredited for mentioning graphene oxide in the vaccines (even though Japan had a leak of Pfizer's internal documents which detailed one of the ingredients was graphene oxide), and since a lot of people are under the false assumption that Graphene oxide cannot be magnetised -

I've gone through the effort to compile all the evidence to the contrary, so that people have resources they can rely on when someone who says otherwise tries to dismiss the discussion on the issue and tells you to take your meds, when in reality the science is all there, and available on the internet.

Peer reviewed journal articles on the subjects are below, as well as proof of graphene oxide being in the vaccines.

----

Magnetism of Graphene Oxide and SPIONS

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... - Superparamagnetic nanoparticle delivery of DNA vaccine

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... - Effect of Polyethylene Glycol on the Formation of Magnetic Nanoparticles Synthesized by Magnetospirillum magnetotacticum MS-1

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... - Effect of magnetic graphene oxide on cellular behaviors and osteogenesis under a moderate static magnetic field

www.sciencedirect.com...
- Magnetic graphene oxide: Synthesis approaches, physicochemical characteristics, and biomedical applications
---

Neural interfacing with Graphene Oxide

www.frontiersin.org... - Interfacing Graphene-Based Materials With Neural Cells

Magneto protein

www.theguardian.com... -
Genetically engineered 'Magneto' protein remotely controls brain and behaviour
Reference: DOI: 10.1038/nn.4265 - Genetically targeted magnetic control of the nervous system. Nat. Neurosci.

"Next, the researchers inserted the Magneto DNA sequence into the genome of a virus, together with the gene encoding green fluorescent protein, and regulatory DNA sequences that cause the construct to be expressed only in specified types of neurons. They then injected the virus into the brains of mice, targeting the entorhinal cortex, and dissected the animals’ brains to identify the cells that emitted green fluorescence"

Sounds like a recombinant virus like Corona virus would be a great target to attach a magneto protein to due to Corona virus's recombinant nature, it likes to attach itself onto other DNA.


Graphene in the vaccines
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... - PEGylated lipid bilayer-wrapped nano-graphene oxides for synergistic co-delivery of doxorubicin and rapamycin to prevent drug resistance in cancers

www.nature.com... - Graphene oxide-incorporated hydrogels for biomedical applications

www.drrobertyoung.com... - Scanning & Transmission Electron Microscopy Reveals Graphene Oxide in CoV-19 Vaccines

www.orwell.city... - Graphene oxide can be identified through blood tests

jellyfish.news... - COVID Vax Ingredients Exposed: Graphene, Nanometals, PEG and Parasites

ibb.co... - PEGylated GO lipid in vaccine

But what good will it do if people become zombies ( like many of the homeless ) , won't civilization collapse soon afterwards ?

a reply to: natoshis

I don't think that there are many people disputing the possibility for the presence of particles with magnetic properties in the vaccines. They could certainly be there, I am personally not disputing that.

What people find ludicrous is the idea that magnets will stick to the injection sites because of these magnetic particles.

Simple physics says it's nonsense...

Whilst there may be magnetic particles in any of the vaccines, they will be so small and few in quantity as to have little to no effect from magnets.

For example, the vaccine dose for Pfizer is 0,3ml. Even if that was solid iron, which it obviously can't be, it would only weigh 2,36g.

If a whopping 10% of the vaccine was iron, it would weigh 0,23g. Take 0,23g of iron and glue it to a wall.
Now try to stick a magnet to it and see what happens.

originally posted by: musicismagic
But what good will it do if people become zombies ( like many of the homeless ) , won't civilization collapse soon afterwards ?

They'll have their slaves burn and bury the dead. Not all of us will die at once or at the same time. Leave the slaves to clean up the mess as usual.

Society is already on the verge of collapse, in my view the elites will go underground in hiding. The motives behind this experimental vaccine technology may include

1. Depopulation
2. Experimenting with mRNA drug delivery to try and find the cure for aging/regeneration with automatic drug delivery through synthetic mRNA
3. Experimenting/refining mind control technology.
4. Crippling everyones immune systems in order to create permanent, life long customers to big pharma and repeat customers for booster shots (making people reliant on big pharma for a working immune system) for $$$$$$$$.

There may even be more motivations as to why they're doing it - never let a good crisis go to waste as they say.

It is very strange that this 5G tower box was recorded having settings for different brainwave states, isn't it? I thought 5G was just 60GHZ-300GHZ frequency bandwidth of EMR. www.bitchute.com...

As to why they would kill off the most obedient, a voluntary death shot means that they themselves would theoretically be safe from exposure, vs an uncontrolled biological weapon which actually had a strong chance to kill. I believe covid is made far more dangerous with a vaccination.

You are the carbon they want to reduce, the world is 90% overpopulated. TPTB do not need 90% of "useless eaters" as they call us, we've been replaced by automation and robots. They don't want to give off the extra profit from automation to us when everyone's made redundant from the lack of work due to automation, they don't want to give a UBI to billions of people. They'd rather cull us down and have what's left over cremate and bury the mess whilst TPTB go into hiding for a few years.

a reply to: natoshis

Very interesting thoughts there.

That Guardian article is very interesting I even did a thread on it.

I encourage everyone to read the Guardian article from 2016.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

originally posted by: Kreeate
a reply to: natoshis

I don't think that there are many people disputing the possibility for the presence of particles with magnetic properties in the vaccines. They could certainly be there, I am personally not disputing that.

What people find ludicrous is the idea that magnets will stick to the injection sites because of these magnetic particles.

Simple physics says it's nonsense...

Whilst there may be magnetic particles in any of the vaccines, they will be so small and few in quantity as to have little to no effect from magnets.

For example, the vaccine dose for Pfizer is 0,3ml. Even if that was solid iron, which it obviously can't be, it would only weigh 2,36g.

If a whopping 10% of the vaccine was iron, it would weigh 0,23g. Take 0,23g of iron and glue it to a wall.
Now try to stick a magnet to it and see what happens.

That's a good point - however there's no point making correlations like that until we have data on exactly how magnetic Graphene Oxide can be made by attaching magnetic iron nanoparticles to them.

Let's try and draw this out and make some evidence based comparisons between the conductivity of iron vs graphene coated with iron nanoparticles


pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... - Enhanced Magnetic Properties of Graphene Coated with Fe2O3 Nanoparticles

Abstract: "Graphene, with its unique 2D nanostructure and excellent electrical, thermal, and mechanical properties, is considered an alternative to carbon nanotubes in nanocomposites. In this study, we present a one step approach for the deposition of iron oxide (Fe2O3) nanoparticles onto graphene sheets through solution mixture. The morphology, crystallinity, and magnetic properties of as-synthesized composites were investigated. It was shown that highly crystalline Fe2O3 nanoparticles were densely and uniformly coated on graphene surface. Magnetic measurements reveal that, as compared to weak diamagnetism of pristine graphene, graphene-Fe2O3 nanocomposites display ferromagnetic behavior with coercivity of 101 Oe, saturation magnetization of 12.6 emu g(-1), and remanent magnetization of 3.13 emu g(-1) at room temperature. The enhanced magnetic performance was attributed to the homogeneous dispersion of Fe2O3 nanoparticles in graphene matrix and such nanocomposites are promising materials for applications in magnetic media and energy storage."

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... - Magnetic interactions in graphene decorated with iron oxide nanoparticles

Abstract: "We present the studies of structural and magnetic properties of graphene composites prepared with several quantities ofα-Fe2O3dopant of 5%, 25% and 50% made with either ethanol or acetone. Our studies showed the presence of a weak magnetic order up to room temperature and saturation magnetization close to 0.2 emu g-1in pure commercial graphene. With regard to magnetic properties of our graphene + iron oxide samples, the solvent used during the preparation of the composite had a significant influence on them. For graphene + Fe2O3samples made with acetone the magnetic properties of pure graphene played a major role in the overall magnetic susceptibility and magnetization. On the other hand, for graphene + iron oxide samples made with ethanol we observed the presence of superparamagnetic blocking atT < 110 K which was due to the additional appearance ofγ-Fe3O4nanoparticles. Changes in the synthesis solvent played a major role in the magnetic properties of our graphene + Fe2O3nanocomposite samples resulting in much higher saturation magnetization for the samples made with ethanol. Both the shape and the parameters characterizing magnetization hysteresis loops depend strongly on the amount of iron oxide and changes in the preparation method."

link.springer.com... - Highest coercivity and considerable saturation magnetization of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles with tunable band gap prepared by thermal decomposition approach

Abstract: "The report states that well-dispersed CoFe2O4 nanoparticles (NPs) with controllable morphology were prepared using an economical and facile one-pot thermal decomposition approach. Cobalt (II) acetylacetonate and Iron (III) acetylacetonate were employed as precursors instead of expensive and toxic pentacarbonyl. The transmission electron microscopy and powder X-ray diffraction investigation show that CoFe2O4 NPs possess cubic morphology, homogeneous size distribution and pure phase structure. Optical band gap was tuned from 1.147 to 0.92 eV and saturation magnetization (M s) increased from 53.91 to 84.01 emu/g for the as-prepared and annealed (700 °C) NPs. The coercivity (H c) enhanced from 1137 to 2109 Oe at room temperature, which is the highest value reported to date for CoFe2O4 NPs synthesized by thermal decomposition. All CoFe2O4 (as-prepared and annealed) NPs showed excellent ferromagnetism behaviour at room temperature. Raman studies of CoFe2O4 NPs confirm the redistribution of Co2+ from octahedral to tetrahedral site. The work demonstrates the great potential of CoFe2O4 NPs as a promising alternative for data storage device applications as well as for opto-magnetic devices."

originally posted by: natoshis

originally posted by: Kreeate
a reply to: natoshis

I don't think that there are many people disputing the possibility for the presence of particles with magnetic properties in the vaccines. They could certainly be there, I am personally not disputing that.

What people find ludicrous is the idea that magnets will stick to the injection sites because of these magnetic particles.

Simple physics says it's nonsense...

Whilst there may be magnetic particles in any of the vaccines, they will be so small and few in quantity as to have little to no effect from magnets.

For example, the vaccine dose for Pfizer is 0,3ml. Even if that was solid iron, which it obviously can't be, it would only weigh 2,36g.

If a whopping 10% of the vaccine was iron, it would weigh 0,23g. Take 0,23g of iron and glue it to a wall.
Now try to stick a magnet to it and see what happens.

That's a good point - however there's no point making correlations like that until we have data on exactly how magnetic Graphene Oxide can be made by attaching magnetic iron nanoparticles to them.

Let's try and draw this out and make some evidence based comparisons between the conductivity of iron vs graphene coated with iron nanoparticles


pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... - Enhanced Magnetic Properties of Graphene Coated with Fe2O3 Nanoparticles

Abstract: "Graphene, with its unique 2D nanostructure and excellent electrical, thermal, and mechanical properties, is considered an alternative to carbon nanotubes in nanocomposites. In this study, we present a one step approach for the deposition of iron oxide (Fe2O3) nanoparticles onto graphene sheets through solution mixture. The morphology, crystallinity, and magnetic properties of as-synthesized composites were investigated. It was shown that highly crystalline Fe2O3 nanoparticles were densely and uniformly coated on graphene surface. Magnetic measurements reveal that, as compared to weak diamagnetism of pristine graphene, graphene-Fe2O3 nanocomposites display ferromagnetic behavior with coercivity of 101 Oe, saturation magnetization of 12.6 emu g(-1), and remanent magnetization of 3.13 emu g(-1) at room temperature. The enhanced magnetic performance was attributed to the homogeneous dispersion of Fe2O3 nanoparticles in graphene matrix and such nanocomposites are promising materials for applications in magnetic media and energy storage."

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... - Magnetic interactions in graphene decorated with iron oxide nanoparticles

Abstract: "We present the studies of structural and magnetic properties of graphene composites prepared with several quantities ofα-Fe2O3dopant of 5%, 25% and 50% made with either ethanol or acetone. Our studies showed the presence of a weak magnetic order up to room temperature and saturation magnetization close to 0.2 emu g-1in pure commercial graphene. With regard to magnetic properties of our graphene + iron oxide samples, the solvent used during the preparation of the composite had a significant influence on them. For graphene + Fe2O3samples made with acetone the magnetic properties of pure graphene played a major role in the overall magnetic susceptibility and magnetization. On the other hand, for graphene + iron oxide samples made with ethanol we observed the presence of superparamagnetic blocking atT < 110 K which was due to the additional appearance ofγ-Fe3O4nanoparticles. Changes in the synthesis solvent played a major role in the magnetic properties of our graphene + Fe2O3nanocomposite samples resulting in much higher saturation magnetization for the samples made with ethanol. Both the shape and the parameters characterizing magnetization hysteresis loops depend strongly on the amount of iron oxide and changes in the preparation method."

link.springer.com... - Highest coercivity and considerable saturation magnetization of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles with tunable band gap prepared by thermal decomposition approach

Abstract: "The report states that well-dispersed CoFe2O4 nanoparticles (NPs) with controllable morphology were prepared using an economical and facile one-pot thermal decomposition approach. Cobalt (II) acetylacetonate and Iron (III) acetylacetonate were employed as precursors instead of expensive and toxic pentacarbonyl. The transmission electron microscopy and powder X-ray diffraction investigation show that CoFe2O4 NPs possess cubic morphology, homogeneous size distribution and pure phase structure. Optical band gap was tuned from 1.147 to 0.92 eV and saturation magnetization (M s) increased from 53.91 to 84.01 emu/g for the as-prepared and annealed (700 °C) NPs. The coercivity (H c) enhanced from 1137 to 2109 Oe at room temperature, which is the highest value reported to date for CoFe2O4 NPs synthesized by thermal decomposition. All CoFe2O4 (as-prepared and annealed) NPs showed excellent ferromagnetism behaviour at room temperature. Raman studies of CoFe2O4 NPs confirm the redistribution of Co2+ from octahedral to tetrahedral site. The work demonstrates the great potential of CoFe2O4 NPs as a promising alternative for data storage device applications as well as for opto-magnetic devices."

The magnetic function of graphene is not in dispute here.
Simple physics indicate that no matter how many magnetic particles you add to the vaccine, magnets will not stick to the injection site. That is my only point.

originally posted by: Kreeate

originally posted by: natoshis

originally posted by: Kreeate
a reply to: natoshis

I don't think that there are many people disputing the possibility for the presence of particles with magnetic properties in the vaccines. They could certainly be there, I am personally not disputing that.

What people find ludicrous is the idea that magnets will stick to the injection sites because of these magnetic particles.

Simple physics says it's nonsense...

Whilst there may be magnetic particles in any of the vaccines, they will be so small and few in quantity as to have little to no effect from magnets.

For example, the vaccine dose for Pfizer is 0,3ml. Even if that was solid iron, which it obviously can't be, it would only weigh 2,36g.

If a whopping 10% of the vaccine was iron, it would weigh 0,23g. Take 0,23g of iron and glue it to a wall.
Now try to stick a magnet to it and see what happens.

That's a good point - however there's no point making correlations like that until we have data on exactly how magnetic Graphene Oxide can be made by attaching magnetic iron nanoparticles to them.

Let's try and draw this out and make some evidence based comparisons between the conductivity of iron vs graphene coated with iron nanoparticles


pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... - Enhanced Magnetic Properties of Graphene Coated with Fe2O3 Nanoparticles

Abstract: "Graphene, with its unique 2D nanostructure and excellent electrical, thermal, and mechanical properties, is considered an alternative to carbon nanotubes in nanocomposites. In this study, we present a one step approach for the deposition of iron oxide (Fe2O3) nanoparticles onto graphene sheets through solution mixture. The morphology, crystallinity, and magnetic properties of as-synthesized composites were investigated. It was shown that highly crystalline Fe2O3 nanoparticles were densely and uniformly coated on graphene surface. Magnetic measurements reveal that, as compared to weak diamagnetism of pristine graphene, graphene-Fe2O3 nanocomposites display ferromagnetic behavior with coercivity of 101 Oe, saturation magnetization of 12.6 emu g(-1), and remanent magnetization of 3.13 emu g(-1) at room temperature. The enhanced magnetic performance was attributed to the homogeneous dispersion of Fe2O3 nanoparticles in graphene matrix and such nanocomposites are promising materials for applications in magnetic media and energy storage."

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... - Magnetic interactions in graphene decorated with iron oxide nanoparticles

Abstract: "We present the studies of structural and magnetic properties of graphene composites prepared with several quantities ofα-Fe2O3dopant of 5%, 25% and 50% made with either ethanol or acetone. Our studies showed the presence of a weak magnetic order up to room temperature and saturation magnetization close to 0.2 emu g-1in pure commercial graphene. With regard to magnetic properties of our graphene + iron oxide samples, the solvent used during the preparation of the composite had a significant influence on them. For graphene + Fe2O3samples made with acetone the magnetic properties of pure graphene played a major role in the overall magnetic susceptibility and magnetization. On the other hand, for graphene + iron oxide samples made with ethanol we observed the presence of superparamagnetic blocking atT < 110 K which was due to the additional appearance ofγ-Fe3O4nanoparticles. Changes in the synthesis solvent played a major role in the magnetic properties of our graphene + Fe2O3nanocomposite samples resulting in much higher saturation magnetization for the samples made with ethanol. Both the shape and the parameters characterizing magnetization hysteresis loops depend strongly on the amount of iron oxide and changes in the preparation method."

link.springer.com... - Highest coercivity and considerable saturation magnetization of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles with tunable band gap prepared by thermal decomposition approach

Abstract: "The report states that well-dispersed CoFe2O4 nanoparticles (NPs) with controllable morphology were prepared using an economical and facile one-pot thermal decomposition approach. Cobalt (II) acetylacetonate and Iron (III) acetylacetonate were employed as precursors instead of expensive and toxic pentacarbonyl. The transmission electron microscopy and powder X-ray diffraction investigation show that CoFe2O4 NPs possess cubic morphology, homogeneous size distribution and pure phase structure. Optical band gap was tuned from 1.147 to 0.92 eV and saturation magnetization (M s) increased from 53.91 to 84.01 emu/g for the as-prepared and annealed (700 °C) NPs. The coercivity (H c) enhanced from 1137 to 2109 Oe at room temperature, which is the highest value reported to date for CoFe2O4 NPs synthesized by thermal decomposition. All CoFe2O4 (as-prepared and annealed) NPs showed excellent ferromagnetism behaviour at room temperature. Raman studies of CoFe2O4 NPs confirm the redistribution of Co2+ from octahedral to tetrahedral site. The work demonstrates the great potential of CoFe2O4 NPs as a promising alternative for data storage device applications as well as for opto-magnetic devices."

The magnetic function of graphene is not in dispute here.
Simple physics indicate that no matter how many magnetic particles you add to the vaccine, magnets will not stick to the injection site. That is my only point.

I believe it is reacting with the iron in the blood to make a larger magnetic spot at the injectionsite.

And all those video's of magnets sticking to people are not fake , and no one has ever even explained how they are faking it so convincingly

I challenge anyone here to make a convincing fake video of a magnet sticking to their arm .

originally posted by: Kreeate
a reply to: natoshis

I don't think that there are many people disputing the possibility for the presence of particles with magnetic properties in the vaccines. They could certainly be there, I am personally not disputing that.

What people find ludicrous is the idea that magnets will stick to the injection sites because of these magnetic particles.

Simple physics says it's nonsense...

Whilst there may be magnetic particles in any of the vaccines, they will be so small and few in quantity as to have little to no effect from magnets.

For example, the vaccine dose for Pfizer is 0,3ml. Even if that was solid iron, which it obviously can't be, it would only weigh 2,36g.

If a whopping 10% of the vaccine was iron, it would weigh 0,23g. Take 0,23g of iron and glue it to a wall.
Now try to stick a magnet to it and see what happens.

Continued from my above post...

www.sciencedirect.com... - The Introduction of Cobalt Ferrite Nanoparticles as a Solution for Magnetostrictive Applications

2.2 The Magnetic Properties
Coercivity initially increased and then decreased with increasing annealing temperature whereas the particle size and saturation magnetization continuously increased. The saturation magnetization and the remnant magnetization were found to be highly dependent upon the heat treatment temperature. The size of nanoparticles was found to be dependent on annealing temperature and time due to coalescence (Ai and Jiang, 2010; Xiao et al., 2007; Maaz et al., 2007; Kodama et al., 1996; Coey, 1971). Coercivity is found to increase with decreasing particle size until a maximum value that is reached at the critical diameter corresponding to the transition stage from the multi to the single-domain state. This is followed by a decrease to zero in the superparamagnetic state (Shanmugavel et al., 2015; Zhao et al., 2008).

The blocking temperature, coercivity, and remnant magnetization were found to decrease linearly with increasing Ni-concentration in cobalt ferrite (Maaz et al., 2009; Köseoğlu et al., 2012b). The saturation magnetization measured at room temperature was found to decrease with decreasing particle size (Sadrolhosseini et al., 2017; Toksha et al., 2008).

Cobalt ferrite single-domain nanoparticles are known to be either in the ferrimagnetic or superparamagnetic state. In these particles, magnetization can randomly flip direction under the influence of temperature. If the magnetization is seen as a function of the temperature, the temperature of the transition from superparamagnetism to ferrimagnetism is called the blocking temperature. The blocking temperature is known as the temperature at which the magnetic anisotropy energy barrier of a nano-magnet is overcome by thermal activation, leading to the fluctuation of its magnetization (Khader and Sankarappa, 2016).

Above the blocking temperature, there is neither remanence nor coercivity and therefore no hysteresis feature, in agreement with the superparamagnetic character of the particles. Below the blocking temperature, CoFe2O4 nanoparticles exhibit ferrimagnetic behavior characterized by hysteresis loops with coercivity, remanence, and a saturation magnetization (Yáñez-Vilar et al., 2009; Li and Kutal, 2003; Kim et al., 2003).


2.3.1 Coercivity
The coercivity [41–56] of magnetic nanoparticles has a striking dependence on their size, as shown in Fig. 2.1. The coercivity Hc is zero below the superparamagnetic (SP) particle size limit r0, single-domain (SD) behavior (SD) is shown between r0 and the single-domain limit rc, and multi-domain (MD) behavior for r > rc.

www.thoughtco.com... - Not All Iron Is Magnetic (Magnetic Elements)

Key Takeaways: Not All Iron Is Magnetic
Most people think of iron as a magnetic material. Iron is ferromagnetic (attracted to magnets), but only within a certain temperature range and other specific conditions.
Iron is magnetic in its α form. The α form occurs below a special temperature called the Curie point, which is 770 °C. Iron is paramagnetic above this temperature and only weakly attracted to a magnetic field.
Magnetic materials consist of atoms with partially-filled electron shells. So, most magnetic materials are metals. Other magnetic elements include nickel and cobalt.
Nonmagnetic (diamagnetic) metals include copper, gold, and silver.

So basically the takeaway is that ferretin based and some metallic based LNPs can actually exhibit greater ferromagnetic properties than regular iron, which means that you're wrong - it doesn't matter that the booster shots do not weigh very much.

originally posted by: sciencelol

originally posted by: Kreeate

originally posted by: natoshis

originally posted by: Kreeate
a reply to: natoshis

I don't think that there are many people disputing the possibility for the presence of particles with magnetic properties in the vaccines. They could certainly be there, I am personally not disputing that.

What people find ludicrous is the idea that magnets will stick to the injection sites because of these magnetic particles.

Simple physics says it's nonsense...

Whilst there may be magnetic particles in any of the vaccines, they will be so small and few in quantity as to have little to no effect from magnets.

For example, the vaccine dose for Pfizer is 0,3ml. Even if that was solid iron, which it obviously can't be, it would only weigh 2,36g.

If a whopping 10% of the vaccine was iron, it would weigh 0,23g. Take 0,23g of iron and glue it to a wall.
Now try to stick a magnet to it and see what happens.

That's a good point - however there's no point making correlations like that until we have data on exactly how magnetic Graphene Oxide can be made by attaching magnetic iron nanoparticles to them.

Let's try and draw this out and make some evidence based comparisons between the conductivity of iron vs graphene coated with iron nanoparticles


pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... - Enhanced Magnetic Properties of Graphene Coated with Fe2O3 Nanoparticles

Abstract: "Graphene, with its unique 2D nanostructure and excellent electrical, thermal, and mechanical properties, is considered an alternative to carbon nanotubes in nanocomposites. In this study, we present a one step approach for the deposition of iron oxide (Fe2O3) nanoparticles onto graphene sheets through solution mixture. The morphology, crystallinity, and magnetic properties of as-synthesized composites were investigated. It was shown that highly crystalline Fe2O3 nanoparticles were densely and uniformly coated on graphene surface. Magnetic measurements reveal that, as compared to weak diamagnetism of pristine graphene, graphene-Fe2O3 nanocomposites display ferromagnetic behavior with coercivity of 101 Oe, saturation magnetization of 12.6 emu g(-1), and remanent magnetization of 3.13 emu g(-1) at room temperature. The enhanced magnetic performance was attributed to the homogeneous dispersion of Fe2O3 nanoparticles in graphene matrix and such nanocomposites are promising materials for applications in magnetic media and energy storage."

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov... - Magnetic interactions in graphene decorated with iron oxide nanoparticles

Abstract: "We present the studies of structural and magnetic properties of graphene composites prepared with several quantities ofα-Fe2O3dopant of 5%, 25% and 50% made with either ethanol or acetone. Our studies showed the presence of a weak magnetic order up to room temperature and saturation magnetization close to 0.2 emu g-1in pure commercial graphene. With regard to magnetic properties of our graphene + iron oxide samples, the solvent used during the preparation of the composite had a significant influence on them. For graphene + Fe2O3samples made with acetone the magnetic properties of pure graphene played a major role in the overall magnetic susceptibility and magnetization. On the other hand, for graphene + iron oxide samples made with ethanol we observed the presence of superparamagnetic blocking atT < 110 K which was due to the additional appearance ofγ-Fe3O4nanoparticles. Changes in the synthesis solvent played a major role in the magnetic properties of our graphene + Fe2O3nanocomposite samples resulting in much higher saturation magnetization for the samples made with ethanol. Both the shape and the parameters characterizing magnetization hysteresis loops depend strongly on the amount of iron oxide and changes in the preparation method."

link.springer.com... - Highest coercivity and considerable saturation magnetization of CoFe2O4 nanoparticles with tunable band gap prepared by thermal decomposition approach

Abstract: "The report states that well-dispersed CoFe2O4 nanoparticles (NPs) with controllable morphology were prepared using an economical and facile one-pot thermal decomposition approach. Cobalt (II) acetylacetonate and Iron (III) acetylacetonate were employed as precursors instead of expensive and toxic pentacarbonyl. The transmission electron microscopy and powder X-ray diffraction investigation show that CoFe2O4 NPs possess cubic morphology, homogeneous size distribution and pure phase structure. Optical band gap was tuned from 1.147 to 0.92 eV and saturation magnetization (M s) increased from 53.91 to 84.01 emu/g for the as-prepared and annealed (700 °C) NPs. The coercivity (H c) enhanced from 1137 to 2109 Oe at room temperature, which is the highest value reported to date for CoFe2O4 NPs synthesized by thermal decomposition. All CoFe2O4 (as-prepared and annealed) NPs showed excellent ferromagnetism behaviour at room temperature. Raman studies of CoFe2O4 NPs confirm the redistribution of Co2+ from octahedral to tetrahedral site. The work demonstrates the great potential of CoFe2O4 NPs as a promising alternative for data storage device applications as well as for opto-magnetic devices."

The magnetic function of graphene is not in dispute here.
Simple physics indicate that no matter how many magnetic particles you add to the vaccine, magnets will not stick to the injection site. That is my only point.

I believe it is reacting with the iron in the blood to make a larger magnetic spot at the injectionsite.

And all those video's of magnets sticking to people are not fake , and no one has ever even explained how they are faking it so convincingly

There is only around 4g of iron in the average human body. Even if all the iron in the whole body concentrated in that one point, a magnet would still not stick.

originally posted by: natoshis

originally posted by: Kreeate
a reply to: natoshis

I don't think that there are many people disputing the possibility for the presence of particles with magnetic properties in the vaccines. They could certainly be there, I am personally not disputing that.

What people find ludicrous is the idea that magnets will stick to the injection sites because of these magnetic particles.

Simple physics says it's nonsense...

Whilst there may be magnetic particles in any of the vaccines, they will be so small and few in quantity as to have little to no effect from magnets.

For example, the vaccine dose for Pfizer is 0,3ml. Even if that was solid iron, which it obviously can't be, it would only weigh 2,36g.

If a whopping 10% of the vaccine was iron, it would weigh 0,23g. Take 0,23g of iron and glue it to a wall.
Now try to stick a magnet to it and see what happens.

Continued from my above post...

www.sciencedirect.com... - The Introduction of Cobalt Ferrite Nanoparticles as a Solution for Magnetostrictive Applications

2.2 The Magnetic Properties
Coercivity initially increased and then decreased with increasing annealing temperature whereas the particle size and saturation magnetization continuously increased. The saturation magnetization and the remnant magnetization were found to be highly dependent upon the heat treatment temperature. The size of nanoparticles was found to be dependent on annealing temperature and time due to coalescence (Ai and Jiang, 2010; Xiao et al., 2007; Maaz et al., 2007; Kodama et al., 1996; Coey, 1971). Coercivity is found to increase with decreasing particle size until a maximum value that is reached at the critical diameter corresponding to the transition stage from the multi to the single-domain state. This is followed by a decrease to zero in the superparamagnetic state (Shanmugavel et al., 2015; Zhao et al., 2008).

The blocking temperature, coercivity, and remnant magnetization were found to decrease linearly with increasing Ni-concentration in cobalt ferrite (Maaz et al., 2009; Köseoğlu et al., 2012b). The saturation magnetization measured at room temperature was found to decrease with decreasing particle size (Sadrolhosseini et al., 2017; Toksha et al., 2008).

Cobalt ferrite single-domain nanoparticles are known to be either in the ferrimagnetic or superparamagnetic state. In these particles, magnetization can randomly flip direction under the influence of temperature. If the magnetization is seen as a function of the temperature, the temperature of the transition from superparamagnetism to ferrimagnetism is called the blocking temperature. The blocking temperature is known as the temperature at which the magnetic anisotropy energy barrier of a nano-magnet is overcome by thermal activation, leading to the fluctuation of its magnetization (Khader and Sankarappa, 2016).

Above the blocking temperature, there is neither remanence nor coercivity and therefore no hysteresis feature, in agreement with the superparamagnetic character of the particles. Below the blocking temperature, CoFe2O4 nanoparticles exhibit ferrimagnetic behavior characterized by hysteresis loops with coercivity, remanence, and a saturation magnetization (Yáñez-Vilar et al., 2009; Li and Kutal, 2003; Kim et al., 2003).

2.3 Size-dependent magnetic properties
Magnetic nanoparticles exhibit a number of magnetic properties that can be attributed to the reduced dimensions of the particles. These include coercivity and superparamagnetism.

2.3.1 Coercivity
The coercivity [41–56] of magnetic nanoparticles has a striking dependence on their size, as shown in Fig. 2.1. The coercivity Hc is zero below the superparamagnetic (SP) particle size limit r0, single-domain (SD) behavior (SD) is shown between r0 and the single-domain limit rc, and multi-domain (MD) behavior for r > rc.

2.1. Overview of the size dependence of coercivity exhibited by magnetic particles.

2.3.2 Superparamagnetism
Very fine ferromagnetic particles have very short relaxation times, even at room temperature, and behave superparamagnetically [57–69]. Their behavior is paramagnetic but their magnetization values are typical of ferromagnetic substances. The individual particles have normal ferromagnetic movements but very short relaxation times, enabling them to rapidly follow directional changes in an applied field. Superparamagnetism is characterized by two significant features. Firstly, there is no hysteresis, which means both retentivity and coercivity are zero. Secondly, magnetization curves measured at different temperatures superimpose when magnetization (M) is plotted as a function of field (H)/temperature (T), as is shown in Fig. 2.2. This also demonstrates that superparamagnetism can be destroyed by cooling. The temperature at which this occurs is called the blocking temperature (TB) and is dependent linearly on volume and the magnitude of the crystal field anisotropy.

www.thoughtco.com... - Not All Iron Is Magnetic (Magnetic Elements)

Key Takeaways: Not All Iron Is Magnetic
Most people think of iron as a magnetic material. Iron is ferromagnetic (attracted to magnets), but only within a certain temperature range and other specific conditions.
Iron is magnetic in its α form. The α form occurs below a special temperature called the Curie point, which is 770 °C. Iron is paramagnetic above this temperature and only weakly attracted to a magnetic field.
Magnetic materials consist of atoms with partially-filled electron shells. So, most magnetic materials are metals. Other magnetic elements include nickel and cobalt.
Nonmagnetic (diamagnetic) metals include copper, gold, and silver.

So basically the takeaway is that ferretin based and some metallic based LNPs can actually exhibit greater ferromagnetic properties than regular iron, which means that you're wrong - it doesn't matter that the booster shots do not weigh very much.

So we have "Cobalt Ferrite Nanoparticles" in the vaccines?

You have to balance the energies at play. The energy required for a magnet to stick to (dry) human skin is more than can be artificially applied to the magnetic ability of graphene via coating with Fe2O3 nanoparticles.

Do you have some data as to how much graphene is in each vaccine dosage?

originally posted by: sciencelol
I challenge anyone here to make a convincing fake video of a magnet sticking to their arm .

I have yet to see a convincing "real" video of a magnet sticking to an arm, that is not caused by sweat, friction or glue.

originally posted by: Kreeate

So we have "Cobalt Ferrite Nanoparticles" in the vaccines?

You have to balance the energies at play. The energy required for a magnet to stick to (dry) human skin is more than can be artificially applied to the magnetic ability of graphene via coating with Fe2O3 nanoparticles.

Do you have some data as to how much graphene is in each vaccine dosage?

No I don't, but do you have data on how much energy is required for a magnet to stick to an object?

I just gave figures on how strong the magnetic force is for some ferromagnetic LNPs. Some ferrmagnetic LNPs exhibit a stronger magnetic force than vulgar Fe, so you saying that the vaccines cannot be magnetic due to their weight and the amount of iron that could potentially be in them is a false correlation and plain incorrect.

originally posted by: Kreeate

originally posted by: sciencelol
I challenge anyone here to make a convincing fake video of a magnet sticking to their arm .

I have yet to see a convincing "real" video of a magnet sticking to an arm, that is not caused by sweat, friction or glue.

No need to stick a magnet to an arm at all. How would you explain this occuring if there wasn't something magnetic in the vaccine (something underneath the skin pulling the skin towards a magnet at the injection site) www.bitchute.com...

Magnet sticks to vial of Moderna - www.bitchute.com... - So much for your claim that 1.5 million units of Moderna were recalled from Japan not because they were attracted to magnets, but just because they displayed a weak reactivity.

This guy removed magnetic object from underneath his arm at the injection site with a surgical instrument - www.bitchute.com...

originally posted by: natoshis
...so you saying that the vaccines cannot be magnetic due to their weight and the amount of iron that could potentially be in them is a false correlation and plain incorrect.

I never said that. I have from the beginning admitted that the vaccines may very well have magnetic properties.

I'm saying that the mass(volume) of the vaccine is insufficient in magnetic energy to hold up a magnet on the surface of the skin, unaided by sweat, friction or anything other than magnetism.

Regarding energy required... there are many factors involved and it's over my head. I'll contact a colleague of mine for this information and get back to you. He has 32 years experience in practical and theoretical magnetic particle separation and interaction. I won't say in which industry.

Regarding the bitchute videos, I don't do bitchute, sorry. Got any other sources?

People having magnets sticking to them has been going on before this vaccination program started.

Cheep tests for being secretly microchipped

As for what exactly is going on, I don't know. Maybe there is something in the water or food supply? Talking to my doctor about it at the time, he did not want to know, just said some people have different things going on.

More recently there has been a decline in the magnetic strength, not strong enough to hold a magnet these days, but can still feel a slight repulsive / attractive force in some spots. Have taking preventative treatments for covid been a part of breaking down these magnetic effects and another reason for why the government is trying to suppress these treatments?

Iron is not the only element that has a magnetic effect, with the neodymium magnets, neodymium and boron is used to increase the magnetic strength. Who really knows just what other elements and combinations can combine to produce strong magnetic effects? SM-102 is a strange one as it uses a paramagnetic effect to force the mRNA into to cell.

originally posted by: Kreeate

originally posted by: natoshis
...so you saying that the vaccines cannot be magnetic due to their weight and the amount of iron that could potentially be in them is a false correlation and plain incorrect.

I never said that. I have from the beginning admitted that the vaccines may very well have magnetic properties.

I'm saying that the mass(volume) of the vaccine is insufficient in magnetic energy to hold up a magnet on the surface of the skin, unaided by sweat, friction or anything other than magnetism.

Regarding energy required... there are many factors involved and it's over my head. I'll contact a colleague of mine for this information and get back to you. He has 32 years experience in practical and theoretical magnetic particle separation and interaction. I won't say in which industry.

Regarding the bitchute videos, I don't do bitchute, sorry. Got any other sources?

Sorry, those videos aren't available on any pozzed video platforms, so unfortunately not. Here's a screenshot though of the points of interest from the 3 videos i linked ibb.co...

originally posted by: natoshis

originally posted by: Kreeate

originally posted by: natoshis
...so you saying that the vaccines cannot be magnetic due to their weight and the amount of iron that could potentially be in them is a false correlation and plain incorrect.

I never said that. I have from the beginning admitted that the vaccines may very well have magnetic properties.

I'm saying that the mass(volume) of the vaccine is insufficient in magnetic energy to hold up a magnet on the surface of the skin, unaided by sweat, friction or anything other than magnetism.

Regarding energy required... there are many factors involved and it's over my head. I'll contact a colleague of mine for this information and get back to you. He has 32 years experience in practical and theoretical magnetic particle separation and interaction. I won't say in which industry.

Regarding the bitchute videos, I don't do bitchute, sorry. Got any other sources?

Sorry, those videos aren't available on any pozzed video platforms, so unfortunately not. Here's a screenshot though of the points of interest from the 3 videos i linked ibb.co...

Thank you for being civil and not immediately labeling me because I don't prefer bitchute. Much appreciated

originally posted by: sciencelol
I challenge anyone here to make a convincing fake video of a magnet sticking to their arm .

I challenge anyone to have a magnet stick where it's been dusted with talcum powder..good luck..lol