It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Something is going to happen here before November next year to suspend elections and declare martial law.
The only way it won’t will be if they still believe they can cheat at will.
We will turn into a police state.....
.... but eventually it will turn into gorilla warfare here....
...with all our guns and ammunition.
You people in the rest of the world are crazy for disarming.
1. Background
Media reports of rumoured plans to cut the army to 70,000 personnel
has prompted much concern in Parliament about the current future size
of the armed forces.
Current numbers of personnel
There are three main ways to measure the number (strength) of military
personnel, depending on whether one includes trained and untrained,
Gurkhas and full time reserve personnel. The numbers differ depending
on which method is used. The first in the list - total full time UK Armed
Forces - is the most comprehensive: it includes the UK Regular Forces,
Gurkhas, and Full Time Reserve personnel:
• Total full time UK Armed Forces: 155,474
• Total full time UK Regular Forces: 147,525
• Total trained full time UK Armed Forces: 137,280
All three services are currently below the requirement for trained
strength. Overall there is a deficit of 5.6%, or 8,157 personnel, of the
stated required strength (which is 145,437). So the Army’s required
strength is 82,646 but the actual strength, as of 1 October 2017, is
77,440.
When Reserves, all UK regular personnel, Gurkhas and other personnel
are included, the total UK Service Personnel is 195,730. Volunteer
Reserve personnel make up 19% of that number, numbering just over
37,000, on 1 October 2017.1
originally posted by: johnb
Ah the Macc lads some of my mates supported them on tour waaaaay back.
I live near a ton of miltary bases and not seen any uptick in movements. (Salisbury Plain) and there is nowhere nearly enough to instigate martial law.
researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk... DP-2018-0016/CDP-2018-0016.pdf
1. Background
Media reports of rumoured plans to cut the army to 70,000 personnel
has prompted much concern in Parliament about the current future size
of the armed forces.
Current numbers of personnel
There are three main ways to measure the number (strength) of military
personnel, depending on whether one includes trained and untrained,
Gurkhas and full time reserve personnel. The numbers differ depending
on which method is used. The first in the list - total full time UK Armed
Forces - is the most comprehensive: it includes the UK Regular Forces,
Gurkhas, and Full Time Reserve personnel:
• Total full time UK Armed Forces: 155,474
• Total full time UK Regular Forces: 147,525
• Total trained full time UK Armed Forces: 137,280
All three services are currently below the requirement for trained
strength. Overall there is a deficit of 5.6%, or 8,157 personnel, of the
stated required strength (which is 145,437). So the Army’s required
strength is 82,646 but the actual strength, as of 1 October 2017, is
77,440.
When Reserves, all UK regular personnel, Gurkhas and other personnel
are included, the total UK Service Personnel is 195,730. Volunteer
Reserve personnel make up 19% of that number, numbering just over
37,000, on 1 October 2017.1
Also remember most of those will be support not fighters.
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: nonspecific
"It's like a two Horse race and someone stole one of the Horses."
Said about Scottish Football at one point not that long ago, but it applies to British politics just as well.
originally posted by: nonspecific
If you've gone this long without visiting Macc I'd try and keep it that way.
If I had to choose between martial law or moving to Macclesfield I'd be going for the full on dystopian 1984 option.
a reply to: Freeborn