It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
vaccine industry and its gain-of-function, virus engineering infrastructure is not content with forcing spike protein experiments on every man, woman and child. The vaccine industry and its vast network of propagandists are now targeting animals – minks, cats, dogs and other pets.
In fact, Great Britain’s Labour Party is already urging health ministers to approve coronavirus vaccines for pets. Sir Mark Hendrick said, “The priority is to vaccinate humans, but a year or so down the line we have to look at animal vaccines.”
He also said the virus possibly originated in bats and believes this justifies inoculating pets (even though WHO and China have failed to identify an animal reservoir for the SARS-CoV-2 virus).
Spike protein to be “tweaked” to create new vaccines for pets
Covid vaccines for animals will do nothing more than harm the innate immune system of the animals and cause inflammation in their cardiovascular system, leading to more vet visits, hospitalizations and deaths – an atrocity already being witnessed in vaccinated human populations.
This is just pure unproven bull#. No offense, but you can repeat these numbers until you are blue in the face and it will never make them true.
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
originally posted by: pteridine
a reply to: AaarghZombies
The vax only reduces symptoms for the vaxee, it does not prevent transmission at all. The entire premise of "herd immunity" from the vax is false and Fauci is ignoring that fact. Masks are a feel good w/resp to a virus, especially the Chinese paper dust masks or cloth masks. The virus will mutate into a less virulent more contagious strain -- according to some it will be a cold by spring.
People are balancing the possible side effects of the vax, which are not insignificant, with the chances of being sicker from the WuFlu. It is an individual decision and does not affect anyone else.
Nope, by reducing the prevalence of the virus in the body the vaccine significantly reduces transmission.
On average an unvaxxed person will infect 3 other people. Whereas there will, on average, only be one new infection for every 4 vaxxed people.
You're chanced of having serious side effect form the vaccine are 0.0067%. Which is literally is the definition of insignificant.
originally posted by: macaronicaesar
This is just pure unproven bull#. No offense, but you can repeat these numbers until you are blue in the face and it will never make them true.
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
originally posted by: pteridine
a reply to: AaarghZombies
The vax only reduces symptoms for the vaxee, it does not prevent transmission at all. The entire premise of "herd immunity" from the vax is false and Fauci is ignoring that fact. Masks are a feel good w/resp to a virus, especially the Chinese paper dust masks or cloth masks. The virus will mutate into a less virulent more contagious strain -- according to some it will be a cold by spring.
People are balancing the possible side effects of the vax, which are not insignificant, with the chances of being sicker from the WuFlu. It is an individual decision and does not affect anyone else.
Nope, by reducing the prevalence of the virus in the body the vaccine significantly reduces transmission.
On average an unvaxxed person will infect 3 other people. Whereas there will, on average, only be one new infection for every 4 vaxxed people.
You're chanced of having serious side effect form the vaccine are 0.0067%. Which is literally is the definition of insignificant.
Show your work please, so I can dissect it line by line. Thank you.