Blood clots, strings, metals and mystery objects in the blood of the vaxxed

originally posted by: visitedbythem

originally posted by: GravitySucks

originally posted by: visitedbythem
Its hard to believe they all have chromium in them. I was an Environmental officer for 8 years. There are steep fines and potential for jail for releasing water that has very minute amounts of chrome. I think that anything over 5 parts per million was instant fine. Repeat offenders land in jail.
But its ok to squirt directly into someones body? Since when? I had to test multiple times a month for several of the elements listed. Chrome was my #1 enemy

Isn't chromium part of blood makeup? Naturally found in foods?

I believe you will likely find plenty in yours......

Answer the question.

originally posted by: GravitySucks

originally posted by: visitedbythem

originally posted by: GravitySucks

originally posted by: visitedbythem
Its hard to believe they all have chromium in them. I was an Environmental officer for 8 years. There are steep fines and potential for jail for releasing water that has very minute amounts of chrome. I think that anything over 5 parts per million was instant fine. Repeat offenders land in jail.
But its ok to squirt directly into someones body? Since when? I had to test multiple times a month for several of the elements listed. Chrome was my #1 enemy

Isn't chromium part of blood makeup? Naturally found in foods?

I believe you will likely find plenty in yours......

Answer the question.

less than or equal to 1.4 micrograms/liter (µg/L)

Now check yours.

You understand µg/L ?

a reply to: nonspecific

Now they're vaccinating children it will be more difficult to manipulate the figures. If there's a sudden increase over the next year in child mortality it's going to be hard to defend vaccines no matter what diversionary tactics are used. No doubt if there is an increase it will be blamed on some new super variant attacking kids that was cultivated in the unvaccinated.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: nonspecific

A pint of Guinness will always taste good in my book.

When are you going to the pub Andy? You need a break mate..

I am now being pressured into getting the vax....

It may come down to giving in and getting the shot or face total homelessness in an Alaskan winter.....

Im pretty bummed and I've said ill stand my ground to the end but I must admit now that it has gotten real I am probably going to get it so I don't get out on the streets and will have all the social and economical benefits.

Im a little worried as I am now in the phase of deciding which vax to go with.....

It is very reassuring seeing everybody around me getting it and they are all perfectly fine...

If it was the mark of the beast I would move into the mountains...

To drum up "bussiness" and create "customers". The "selling point"? That if you ain't sick? You will be! So take the shot! It is mandatory!

Do not worry! There will be vaccines or drugs, for any "side effects" of protecting you and others. Just know, that you did the "right thing" in trusting "the science". That's why being a "Medical Doctor" is called a "practice" and you sign a contract/waiver form.

Guess what? If "the science" is wrong and you're right?... You can get a "lawyer" that also "practices", "law". For you?...
They will argue truth, wrong, fiction, good, right, evil, morals, damage, "law" and that MAGIC WORD, "precedent".

Personally? I wouldn't buy anything the way "they're" selling it. To much Biden whispering the "seriousness of the situation". The losses do not justify the demand, gain of power or the "legal precedent" it will establish.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Ironclad1964

Im well aware of how science functions Ironclad1964.

So scientifically prove the vaccines contain graphene oxide please?

If that's what you beleve.

The onus lies with you.

Provide the evidence to support the spurious claims, and of the actual tangible sorts please.

After all veracity is important especially so where "the systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world" is concerned.

I never said that the Vaxx has Graphene Oxide in it.

Nor did I say I believe it to be so.

I simply asked for Proof that it didn't, from somebody who claims that science says it doesn't, but presented no evidence to back their claim.

Anyway, it isn't just the Graphene Oxide that is my issue with the vaxx. It (like all vaccines), contains a lot of elements (biological, chemical and elemental), that I would not want in my body in large doses.

That's my choice, but I choose not to become a Mudblood..!!

It's certainly something to watch but would we not have seen a sharp rise in adult mortality from vaccines to be predicting the same from children?

If we have reasonable cause then it's fair to assume but just to speculate based on fear without reason would be pointless.

And every parent has access to the same info and figures when deciding with the child of to vaccinate or not.



a reply to: Grenade

a reply to: nonspecific

Actually the weekly statistics are showing a consistent 5-10% increase in England and Wales over the 5 year average. Covid is only accounting for 1-2% of these deaths according to official figures.


WEEK35
ONS Week 35

"In Week 35, the number of deaths registered was 9.6% above the five-year average (791 deaths higher); this is the third consecutive week that weekly deaths have been above the five-year average, however, the rise was not driven by the coronavirus (COVID-19)."

"The number of deaths registered in the UK in the week ending 28 August 2020 (Week 35) was 10,337, which was 882 deaths higher than the five-year average and 630 deaths lower than Week 34; of the deaths registered in the UK in Week 35, 110 deaths involved COVID-19, 39 fewer deaths than Week 34."


WEEK34
ONS Week 34

"In Week 34, the number of deaths registered was 5.2% above the five-year average (474 deaths higher); this is the second consecutive week that weekly deaths have been above the five-year average, however, the rise was not driven by the coronavirus (COVID-19)."

"The number of deaths registered in the UK in the week ending 21 August 2020 (Week 34) was 10,967, which was 572 deaths higher than the five-year average and 390 deaths higher than Week 33; of the deaths registered in the UK in Week 34, 149 deaths involved COVID-19, 3 deaths higher than Week 33."


WEEK33
ONS Week 33

"There were 10,013 deaths in England and Wales registered in the week ending 20 August 2021 (Week 33); this was 359 fewer deaths than the previous week (Week 32) and 10.2% above the five-year average (928 more deaths)."

"The number of deaths registered in the UK in the week ending 20 August 2021 was 11,519, which was 1,179 more than the five-year average; of deaths registered in the UK in Week 33, 654 involved COVID-19, that is, 2 more than in Week 32."

Where is the data on any of these days being attributed directly to a vaccine?

At present there are around 1600 yellow card reports of vaccine adr's that result in death.

At present there is no way of knowing how many of these are in what demographic or if the vaccine had a direct impact on the death or if those that died had comorbidities.

Given the fact that there's over 50,000,000 people vaccinated in the UK 1600 possible fatalities is not really a cause for great concern is it?



a reply to: Grenade

a reply to: nonspecific

Was it of great concern when daily deaths from the virus where around the 1000 mark in a population of 50,000,000?

You're right, there hasn't been enough rigorous studies to generate data on the safety of vaccines.

Something is killing people at a higher rate than previous years. Generally when a problem arises with my own health i look to what's new in my life that could be causing it.

If even 1000 kids over the 5 year average die next year you can expect some severe backlash toward vaccines, by severe i mean full scale riots. School age children with no comorbidities rarely die from health issues.

If any kids die as a direct result of the vaccines then it's a cause for concern never mind a thousand.

There's so much hype and misinformation right now that it's hard to know what the truth is.

I'm not up for vaccination for kids simply because I don't think there's enough evidence to show it's either safe or necessary right now.

Those 1600 deaths are not good but knowing that the number is only suspected and there's nothing on the age or health of those that died to say just how safe the vaccines really are it's still not possible to say that there is a real issue with the safety of them.

Those numbers would need to be a lot lot higher for alarm bells to be ringing.


a reply to: Grenade

a reply to: PerfectAnomoly

Perhaps not to you, but it is fascinating to me that Event 201 was held at Johns Hopkins.

That makes them to some degree an enabler of the scam, the planned event.

centerforhealthsecurity.org...

a reply to: nonspecific

I'm open to ideas as to what's causing the increase in overall mortality.

I'll tell you historically who's information has been proven false and who traditionally are the liars in our society. Politicians, MSM, Big Tech and Big Pharma.

originally posted by: visitedbythem

originally posted by: GravitySucks

originally posted by: visitedbythem

originally posted by: GravitySucks

originally posted by: visitedbythem
Its hard to believe they all have chromium in them. I was an Environmental officer for 8 years. There are steep fines and potential for jail for releasing water that has very minute amounts of chrome. I think that anything over 5 parts per million was instant fine. Repeat offenders land in jail.
But its ok to squirt directly into someones body? Since when? I had to test multiple times a month for several of the elements listed. Chrome was my #1 enemy

Isn't chromium part of blood makeup? Naturally found in foods?

I believe you will likely find plenty in yours......

Answer the question.

less than or equal to 1.4 micrograms/liter (µg/L)

Now check yours.

You understand µg/L ?

I sure do. And the chart that says chromium in the vaccines?

It is 1.) unsourced and 2.) has been placed here as if it relates to the OP when it doesn't.

Source please.

originally posted by: GravitySucks
What is the source of this graphic please?

originally posted by: Anon234807

a reply to: GravitySucks

This appears to be from a paper published by Dr Robert O Young:
Dr Young paper

Note that there appears to be an 'expose' of Dr Young here:
Critical posting on Dr Young

In particular the opening remarks are rather interesting:

In July 2017, Robert O. Young, who has marketed himself as “Robert O. Young, M.S., D.Sc., Ph.D.,”was sentenced to prison for practicing medicine without a license.

I leave it to others to consider this.

a reply to: Darkstar2

Thanks. I didn't find it in the sourced listed for him in the OP, but I may have missed the links within the link. Thought I went through the whole thing.

I am interested in finding out how they determined that all this is in the vaccines, whether it was from blood samples or from the actual vaccines. Most of what's listed there is already in the blood and in the body, some of them in people who have had hip or other replacements (the titanium and also the chromium in particular).

Also, I mistakenly thought everyone here knew his history.

a reply to: GravitySucks

I suspect that it is entirely possible that they made it up and borrowed a lot of pictures from elsewhere.

For example, the diagram in 19) misunderstands how GPS works, and caused me to chuckle. It is borrowed and altered from the original.

a reply to: Anon234807


I am a serious lurker on this site for years..... i never post or comment ever. However, I recently was looking into graphene and what exactly it is and why it would be used and came across this video from 2016. In all of the scientific information there is a portion about when graphene looks like with human cells and how it creates this net effect....which looks an awful like the pics of this bloodwork. its worth the watch.