It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: GeechQuestInfo
So suddenly after hundreds of thousands of years evolving naturally alongside pathogens and adapting appropriately, the human immune system is now a walking time bomb simply because a new experimental treatment has hit the market. Our natural effectiveness at combating coronavirus and much more deadly viruses is evidenced by our survival as a species. It has the ability to fight hundreds of different virus species and i would suggest a more efficient and trusted source of fighting infection. Who knows what effect mass vaccination will have on this relationship.
originally posted by: VulcanWerks
I bet we get some sort of false flag event perpetrated by a “ring wing anti-vax” extremist tied to the EO announcement that’s completely bogus but opens the door for majority public support to in many ways cripple (economically/societally/etc.) those who are unvaccinated. I have no idea what that event would be, and to an extent it doesn’t matter what it is, but it probably needs to be more 9/11 in nature in terms of shock factor.
It’s a pretty big gamble though… the baked in assumptions for a false flag to work are significant but when I slice those different ways I really don’t think the problems come to pass. The objective is an ideological shift… so I suspect this won’t get too elevated beyond the false flag.
From a narrative perspective, you have to use “right wing”, “Trump Supporter” and “unvaccinated” synonymously. This is what allows the plan to work.
originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: Joneselius
“The greatest tyrannies are always perpetuated in the name of the noblest causes.”
originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: GeechQuestInfo
I haven't used any additional resources since the start of the pandemic despite a covid infection. Granted i only knew i had this deadly disease through testing, think i may have coughed twice.
originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: VulcanWerks
I think it’s you who needs to open their eyes. I’d take my natural resistance and antibodies before your jab any day of the week.
That’s the beauty of freedom, I can think and do what I like.
Now enough with the thought police, leave people the hell alone and mind your own god damn business. Sick of it, perched on the high horse and drunk on false authority.
originally posted by: GeechQuestInfo
a reply to: Breakthestreak
There isn’t a vaccine nor does obesity spread person to person. Unhealthy folks definitely pay increased premiums for insurance currently.
Even outside of that, the unvaccinated are walking legal liabilities. Companies aren’t mandating vaccinations from some moral or ethical high ground. They’ve got lawyers advising them to minimize their legal exposure and institute vaccinations for the workplace.
Again, if you don’t want to get vaccinated I’m apathetic towards it. I also won’t feel sorry for you when society shuns you, as you’re an unnecessary risk to the society we’ve built.
It’s less about being a good citizen and more along the lines of not being a burden.
originally posted by: VulcanWerks
With Biden’s recent EO - and the problems it would cause the administration if it got struck down by SCOTUS (which I think it will after the misfire tweet in particular), something has to be done to ensure this EO garners full public support - forcing lawmakers to not contest it at scale or seem unpopular or on the wrong side of the issue.
The crescendo of the long-game plan for COVID, as a result, may be right around the corner.
www.foxnews.com...
"This is not about freedom or personal choice," Biden said during a Thursday address to the nation. "It's about protecting yourself and those around you, the people you work with, the people you care about, the people you love. My job as president is to protect all Americans."
This is step one. The obvious implication here is that if you’re not vaxed you don’t care about the people around you. My point isn’t about the wrongness or rightness of that implication. It just is the implication.
But now the unvaxed have “cost us all” - which means the unvaccinated are the enemy of us all who want a “normal” life - again, that’s the implication.
"We've been patient but our patience is wearing thin and your refusal has cost all of us," Biden told the tens of millions of unvaccinated people in the country.
Division complete - officially.
Now this makes me wonder… the admin has created this official division that includes tens of million people.
What do you do with that?
Exploit it, obviously - with the goal of moving the country further left.
But how?
I bet we get some sort of false flag event perpetrated by a “ring wing anti-vax” extremist tied to the EO announcement that’s completely bogus but opens the door for majority public support to in many ways cripple (economically/societally/etc.) those who are unvaccinated. I have no idea what that event would be, and to an extent it doesn’t matter what it is, but it probably needs to be more 9/11 in nature in terms of shock factor.
It’s a pretty big gamble though… the baked in assumptions for a false flag to work are significant but when I slice those different ways I really don’t think the problems come to pass. The objective is an ideological shift… so I suspect this won’t get too elevated beyond the false flag.
From a narrative perspective, you have to use “right wing”, “Trump Supporter” and “unvaccinated” synonymously. This is what allows the plan to work.
Capitol Riot was probably a test run and the setup for the walling off of the capital and turning Trump supporters into dipsticks wearing Viking horns (so goes the narrative). That actually worked pretty well but probably not as well as hoped.
The next false flag has to be fabulously over the top compared to the Capitol Riots. It has to be like that as I suspect mobilizing the military against US citizens in the name of public health if they fit a certain profile (unvaccinated right wing) is part of the plan - with full public support the feds will weed out “the problem”.
Remember, the unvaccinated cost all of us and are the problem - weeding out the problem will be hyped up by the media to demonstrate who the real enemy is.
Vax status IS the deciding factor - if this all occurred along political lines it would be too transparent. The COVID end-game is to shift the country left using event to help do it. Heck, done right they could layer in gun control, social credit, vax passes, etc.
This is the true Great Reset - moving the country materially further left to align more with Western Europe.
There will be no “civil war” and the military will follow orders - remember that whole “purging of right-wing extremism” from the services? They’ll fall in line almost certainly and those who don’t will be treated just like the unvaccinated or disciplined severely. Compliance is mandatory.
These efforts, as I see it, will shame Trump supporters into obsolescence - which by default moves the country left. If you support the GOP/Trump you are a horn wearing, angry, self-absorbed and societally unfit angry white dude. That’s the narrative and anyone fitting that persona will be ostracized and hunted down until they comply and if they don’t it’s either detention/camps/etc.
Assuming they aren’t vaccinated… because if they’re vaccinated they’ll be ok. That’s the diving line.
Sounds like another occurrence from the 20th century…
This will usher in a much more “moderate” right that will become more socially liberal - permanently - for anyone who resembles the unvaccinated will forever be painted as the problem in society.
This was always the end game, folks.
And all of the vaccine theories, COVID theories and more are probably just carrots to feed and keep the division alive. That’s all things like Bitchute and “anonymous nurses” are accomplishing - ensuring that those who are against the Vax stay that way.
In another thread, a comment was made that “the only way to avoid all of this is to get vaccinated - because they are banking on millions of people NOT getting vaccinated”. This rings 100% true to me and I suspect that those who say “whatever bring it on” will have their wishes fulfilled - not necessarily in terms of military violence against them but material social stigma, job opportunities, education opportunities and more. That said, if someone gets violent or “resists” I’m sure there are government officials who via the military or otherwise would be happy to oblige you to your satisfaction.
Problem is, if you “fight back”, you only make their plan work better. It’s a trap… and the unvaccinated are walking straight into it and presiding over the demise of more than COVID - you’ll turn every rural trump supporters into something that society will shun absolutely - because the only people who will care are their fellow rural Trump supporters.
I’m vaccinated and hope I’m wrong about what’s about to hit tens of millions of Americans but to me the above is how it plays out. My sincere hope is unvaccinated people don’t go postal and make this situation even worse because the powder keg is full. If a bunch of people do “take a stand” it only makes the plan work better - but I doubt that’s what’s truly hoped for or necessary because that creates new problems and can spiral quickly. Plus, tens of millions aren’t required for this to work - one could use 20 to make an ideological shift - which we learned from 9/11.
The above is my current take on the impact of being unvaccinated and, to me, it’s not worth being stubborn and not getting the vax - the true price tag of that is far more significant than what’s imagined.
The jabs actually do materially help improve COVID outcomes undoubtedly at this point. But if the real benefit to public health isn’t an incentive to rethink your position the above might be.
That’s my hypothetical read of the tea leaves as things stand.
originally posted by: angelchemuel
a reply to: VulcanWerks
That's what Mother Nature calls 'survival of the fitest'. How the heck do you think we have evolved thus far.
Secondly with reference to your OP....nice try at reverse psychology....
Rainbows
Jane
originally posted by: Grenade
a reply to: VulcanWerks
I think it’s you who needs to open their eyes. I’d take my natural resistance and antibodies before your jab any day of the week.
That’s the beauty of freedom, I can think and do what I like.
Now enough with the thought police, leave people the hell alone and mind your own god damn business. Sick of it, perched on the high horse and drunk on false authority.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: VulcanWerks
With Biden’s recent EO - and the problems it would cause the administration if it got struck down by SCOTUS (which I think it will after the misfire tweet in particular), something has to be done to ensure this EO garners full public support - forcing lawmakers to not contest it at scale or seem unpopular or on the wrong side of the issue.
The crescendo of the long-game plan for COVID, as a result, may be right around the corner.
www.foxnews.com...
"This is not about freedom or personal choice," Biden said during a Thursday address to the nation. "It's about protecting yourself and those around you, the people you work with, the people you care about, the people you love. My job as president is to protect all Americans."
This is step one. The obvious implication here is that if you’re not vaxed you don’t care about the people around you. My point isn’t about the wrongness or rightness of that implication. It just is the implication.
But now the unvaxed have “cost us all” - which means the unvaccinated are the enemy of us all who want a “normal” life - again, that’s the implication.
"We've been patient but our patience is wearing thin and your refusal has cost all of us," Biden told the tens of millions of unvaccinated people in the country.
Division complete - officially.
Now this makes me wonder… the admin has created this official division that includes tens of million people.
What do you do with that?
Exploit it, obviously - with the goal of moving the country further left.
But how?
I bet we get some sort of false flag event perpetrated by a “ring wing anti-vax” extremist tied to the EO announcement that’s completely bogus but opens the door for majority public support to in many ways cripple (economically/societally/etc.) those who are unvaccinated. I have no idea what that event would be, and to an extent it doesn’t matter what it is, but it probably needs to be more 9/11 in nature in terms of shock factor.
It’s a pretty big gamble though… the baked in assumptions for a false flag to work are significant but when I slice those different ways I really don’t think the problems come to pass. The objective is an ideological shift… so I suspect this won’t get too elevated beyond the false flag.
From a narrative perspective, you have to use “right wing”, “Trump Supporter” and “unvaccinated” synonymously. This is what allows the plan to work.
Capitol Riot was probably a test run and the setup for the walling off of the capital and turning Trump supporters into dipsticks wearing Viking horns (so goes the narrative). That actually worked pretty well but probably not as well as hoped.
The next false flag has to be fabulously over the top compared to the Capitol Riots. It has to be like that as I suspect mobilizing the military against US citizens in the name of public health if they fit a certain profile (unvaccinated right wing) is part of the plan - with full public support the feds will weed out “the problem”.
Remember, the unvaccinated cost all of us and are the problem - weeding out the problem will be hyped up by the media to demonstrate who the real enemy is.
Vax status IS the deciding factor - if this all occurred along political lines it would be too transparent. The COVID end-game is to shift the country left using event to help do it. Heck, done right they could layer in gun control, social credit, vax passes, etc.
This is the true Great Reset - moving the country materially further left to align more with Western Europe.
There will be no “civil war” and the military will follow orders - remember that whole “purging of right-wing extremism” from the services? They’ll fall in line almost certainly and those who don’t will be treated just like the unvaccinated or disciplined severely. Compliance is mandatory.
These efforts, as I see it, will shame Trump supporters into obsolescence - which by default moves the country left. If you support the GOP/Trump you are a horn wearing, angry, self-absorbed and societally unfit angry white dude. That’s the narrative and anyone fitting that persona will be ostracized and hunted down until they comply and if they don’t it’s either detention/camps/etc.
Assuming they aren’t vaccinated… because if they’re vaccinated they’ll be ok. That’s the diving line.
Sounds like another occurrence from the 20th century…
This will usher in a much more “moderate” right that will become more socially liberal - permanently - for anyone who resembles the unvaccinated will forever be painted as the problem in society.
This was always the end game, folks.
And all of the vaccine theories, COVID theories and more are probably just carrots to feed and keep the division alive. That’s all things like Bitchute and “anonymous nurses” are accomplishing - ensuring that those who are against the Vax stay that way.
In another thread, a comment was made that “the only way to avoid all of this is to get vaccinated - because they are banking on millions of people NOT getting vaccinated”. This rings 100% true to me and I suspect that those who say “whatever bring it on” will have their wishes fulfilled - not necessarily in terms of military violence against them but material social stigma, job opportunities, education opportunities and more. That said, if someone gets violent or “resists” I’m sure there are government officials who via the military or otherwise would be happy to oblige you to your satisfaction.
Problem is, if you “fight back”, you only make their plan work better. It’s a trap… and the unvaccinated are walking straight into it and presiding over the demise of more than COVID - you’ll turn every rural trump supporters into something that society will shun absolutely - because the only people who will care are their fellow rural Trump supporters.
I’m vaccinated and hope I’m wrong about what’s about to hit tens of millions of Americans but to me the above is how it plays out. My sincere hope is unvaccinated people don’t go postal and make this situation even worse because the powder keg is full. If a bunch of people do “take a stand” it only makes the plan work better - but I doubt that’s what’s truly hoped for or necessary because that creates new problems and can spiral quickly. Plus, tens of millions aren’t required for this to work - one could use 20 to make an ideological shift - which we learned from 9/11.
The above is my current take on the impact of being unvaccinated and, to me, it’s not worth being stubborn and not getting the vax - the true price tag of that is far more significant than what’s imagined.
The jabs actually do materially help improve COVID outcomes undoubtedly at this point. But if the real benefit to public health isn’t an incentive to rethink your position the above might be.
That’s my hypothetical read of the tea leaves as things stand.
Trump said get the vaccine, his actual words were "it's an individual choice and no one can take that away, but I recommend vaccination"
originally posted by: murphy22
a reply to: VulcanWerks
"Collective"?, .."What life used to be"?.."People are dying on the wrong hill right now?...Don't know about you, but I ain't been stepping over any bodies lately.
1. You lost me, at "Collective". I'm an individual.
2. You lost me, at 1.
originally posted by: angelchemuel
a reply to: VulcanWerks
That's what Mother Nature calls 'survival of the fitest'. How the heck do you think we have evolved thus far.
Secondly with reference to your OP....nice try at reverse psychology....
Rainbows
Jane
originally posted by: angelchemuel
a reply to: VulcanWerks
I am thinking, but clearly not on the same wave length as you.
As to passive agressive...think you need to look at yourself first. I was being polite calling your OP reverse psychology.