So now what? What do we do if this is true?

Big if true, but it won't stay on Youtube for long.
Needs to go on Bitchute soon.

a reply to: Prisoner60863

Yes it is true. The man from Barbados has been paying attention. Yes, many dissenting scientists have pointed out that the spike protein is a bio weapon and that the shots themselves are bioweapons.

The presence of graphene oxide in the cocktail is enough for me. Why to I want to take that? What purpose does it serve?

More truth spoken in a town hall meeting in Barbados than in 2 months worth of talk in the US Congress.

a reply to: Prisoner60863

Good! Someone exposing everything, you know he is right when he gets interrupted, they don't want anyone to know what's going on. Let me just say if you're not mad about being lied to, that this whole thing was put on to wipe us out and kill us you're still not awake. I hope more people come out and expose this # for what it really is. It's a travesty that we are here in the first place!

originally posted by: sapien82
Just to add he claims he has evidence directly from a whistleblower in Pfizer that shows that the vaccines contain graphene oxide

That was an interesting point-he said he had a document from inside pfizer-If that is the case he should make that document public.
We know from other documents that graphene oxide has been patented for use in MRNA vaccine delivery,yet none of the vaccine makers state it is in their vaccine.

Will we ever find out the truth?

Will we ever be able to make a decision based on actual informed consent?

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

I think the reason its taking place in barbados as one of the guests on the board is from Pfizer
a doctor there to reassure residents of Barbados on the saftey and efficacy of the vaccines.

I think he addresses them directly in the speech

originally posted by: Silcone Synapse

originally posted by: sapien82
Just to add he claims he has evidence directly from a whistleblower in Pfizer that shows that the vaccines contain graphene oxide

Will we ever be able to make a decision based on actual informed consent?

aye and neither can anyone in the medical community as they dont know the full ingredients or full long term effects on humans

a reply to: sapien82

The fact that the drug companies were granted immunity from liability was a massive red flag for me.

Anyone who took it despite knowing that information is... I don't have the words...

a reply to: Wide-Eyes
And it got even better when they didn't bother testing for cacinogenicity or fertility issues when they rushed though the FDA approval.
That was comforting huh?

What we can do is get shot by a bullet before getting shot by the jab. Stay away from signing up to this perpetual genetic modification experimental testing as if your life depends on it, it just may.

TRADE SECEretz
www.fda.gov...
trialsitenews.com...

That's how they hide it..its in all of them

originally posted by: Silcone Synapse

originally posted by: sapien82
Just to add he claims he has evidence directly from a whistleblower in Pfizer that shows that the vaccines contain graphene oxide

That was an interesting point-he said he had a document from inside pfizer-If that is the case he should make that document public.
We know from other documents that graphene oxide has been patented for use in MRNA vaccine delivery,yet none of the vaccine makers state it is in their vaccine.

Will we ever find out the truth?

Will we ever be able to make a decision based on actual informed consent?

I'm starting to hear a lot about graphene oxide lately.

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
a reply to: sapien82

The fact that the drug companies were granted immunity from liability was a massive red flag for me.

Anyone who took it despite knowing that information is... I don't have the words...

That's the biggest reason it slammed on the brakes for me.

originally posted by: Chance321

originally posted by: Wide-Eyes
a reply to: sapien82

The fact that the drug companies were granted immunity from liability was a massive red flag for me.

Anyone who took it despite knowing that information is... I don't have the words...

That's the biggest reason it slammed on the brakes for me.

Yep, it should have slammed the brakes on for everyone but unfortunately the NWO seems to have twisted us into this neo-authoritarian reality where the clowns appear to be in charge.

I mean when we really look at it, it's like the greatest prank ever pulled. Sadly, countless people have died in this chess game and I don't know about anyone else but last time I checked, unleashing killer virus' on population centres is bad form to say the least.

In short.

I'm sick of you fascist leftist apologists.

You all suck big hairy legged despots balls.

You like that?

And... the video is now 'disabled'.

More proof that they control the information.
You are only allowed to see sanctioned news.

It must be part of the program.

Just more proof as to who the bad actors are in this war and who will be on the wrong side of history.
And they want me to believe them and take their shot?

originally posted by: oweyoueightone2
a reply to: musicismagic

You also said everyone was going to die of covid and all the nuclear reactors should be shut down around the word. Your predictions seem a little over the top.

I said " everyone will get the virus, NOT everyone will die. Also, about the plants, with the Afghans coming in, better have good OUTSIDE security in place. Years ago I had to go through the security gate at Homestead nuclear plant for the US military, there was just one old man as a guard at the time. I don't even know if he was armed.
So that is why my concerned about the nuclear plants is and will be on my mind.

Intriguing for sure but what gets me is why out of the hundreds of thousands scientists involved (or not) with this whole thing including virus, vaccine and bioweapon reasearch, this is the only credible individual to mention graphene oxide? Aside form the listed ingredients, no one has done a spectral analysis of these vaccines for ethical, safety or hell even curiosity reasons?

An above poster mention of trade secrets makes sense to me but unfortunately "bringing to light" any injustices warrants a misappropriation of trade secrets so the evidence would never even make it to a court. If I recall Haiburton got challenged on it's fracking chemicals years ago but was able to hide behind trade secrets.

The chemicals used in the drilling fluids, developed by Halliburton in 1949, are exempt from regulation under the federal Safe Drinking Water Act. The industry has been permitted to protect the list of chemicals as trade secrets.

Source
What was the result of that lawsuit anyway? I saw the statement to EPA but no progress or findings, hmm. But that's another story..

It just seems if there was graphene oxide in these vaccines, more than a handful of people would know and report it, even at the risk of losing job, funding or credibility, there has to be more that would report on this, right? Maybe now more will after this makes it's run on social medias.

Transcript from Corbin

I just watched the vid again. I thought about "why Barbados?" question.

The part where he is addressing his "Lady Dr friend" who i am to believe is a Pfizer rep @ 6:58. He says "an internal document from pfizer giving by a special person who we have contact with" and that was followed by a cheer.

They might be privy to an Pfizer insider, but have to protect them as well.
He seems confident in making that claim if she is in fact from Pfizer herself, unless he really does.

When was this town hall meeting? and when was the Fauci emails leaked & then proven genuine?

If he was quoting from these emails before publicly known, would that not give a lot of weight to what he says?
Sorry if that's somehow irrelevant or already cleared up.

a reply to: kangawoo
2 to 3 weeks ago.

Well what's the answer here, yes, no, maybe?

Found a decent blogger with some interesting articles and perspective link