It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Macenroe82
Want to watch presentations about the UAP subject from some incredibly bright minds?
Doctors, Physicists, Engineers, Pilots and other scientific minds?
Check out the below video.
Some of the brightest minds out there - even a few of us from the SCU (which I’m also a member of)
If your looking to move away from the Greer types of absurd fantasy and want to listen to a scientific breakdown of some of the most well known UFO events, check this out.
Oh and Ryan Graves even discusses his encounters with the grey cube like anomalies.
"the forces that would put on the pilot... we can achieve those speeds...And turn ourselves to jello"
Acceleration due to gravity, which has nothing to do with acceleration due to changes in velocity.
This means that for each kg of mass, an object will experience 10 N of force.
Does this mean it must be built by ET?
However, that's assuming they are piloted directly versus remotely.
It has nothing to do with the size of a pilot. It has to do with mass.
Did SCU ever fix the flawed analysis by Larry Cates in Appendix K (A Video Analysis) of this report where he claims the object in the FLIR video accelerates?
originally posted by: Macenroe82
Some of the brightest minds out there - even a few of us from the SCU (which I’m also a member of)
...after subscriber comments I realized I needed to seriously consider his (West's) case and found his math to be correct based on the FOV size information in the SCU report. It hurts to change and retract my views but if we can't change our minds when presented with valid evidence we won't get to the truth. And the truth unfortunately often hurts hah.
I watched the full 3 hours, following Chris Lehto's tip to watch it at 1.7x normal speed, it's perfectly watchable at that speed and that only takes 2 hours.
originally posted by: Macenroe82
Graves describes the cube in the sphere UFO encounter in great detail. Confirms that they were seen daily by many other Navy pilots besides the ones that came forward.
One of the most relevant characteristic of the images obtained with ferroelectric arrays, which can be a drawback in some applications, is the halo that surrounds objects having a large contrast with the background (see Fig. 2): bright spots on a dark background will be surrounded by a region darker than the background is and vice versa. The halo is due to the mechanical chopper failing to fully block infrared radiation: a hot source will heat the back of the chopper, and since this secondary radiation is less focused, it will heat the sensor array over a larger area than that of the actual image of the object. It is created when the system electronically subtracts the images with and without chopper obstruction.
originally posted by: ThatDamnDuckAgain
a reply to: Macenroe82
Can you summarize what is special? Any special conclusions? Can't watch videos because I am on a emergency mobile tether and already down to EDGE speeds, other's may have similar obstacles with video.