It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: GenerationGap
originally posted by: joejack1949
Here's a link to a study:
www.nature.com...
"SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-based vaccines are about 95% effective in preventing COVID-19"
Data in the public experiment already indicates the vaccines are nowhere near 95% effective. The paper linked to here is rather easily debunked by the fact that the CDC advises the vaxed to be masked. The fact that a booster is also about to be recommended is another big piece of evidence that the studies used to come to that 95% efficacy score were greatly flawed. But keep it coming, as at least it's a comment that is on topic, so thank you for that.
originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
originally posted by: GenerationGap
originally posted by: joejack1949
Here's a link to a study:
www.nature.com...
"SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-based vaccines are about 95% effective in preventing COVID-19"
Data in the public experiment already indicates the vaccines are nowhere near 95% effective. The paper linked to here is rather easily debunked by the fact that the CDC advises the vaxed to be masked. The fact that a booster is also about to be recommended is another big piece of evidence that the studies used to come to that 95% efficacy score were greatly flawed. But keep it coming, as at least it's a comment that is on topic, so thank you for that.
I'm guessing that you either did not read your source or more likely did not understand it .
originally posted by: GenerationGap
Also regarding:
"The concept of using mRNAs as vaccines was introduced over 30 years ago"
The concept of the flying car was also introduced over 30 years ago; but there's no way in hell you are going to get me to fly in an experimental flying car that was built and delivered in less than 8 months while simultaneously avoiding the long utilized standards designed to ensure safety of even just a regular car that doesn't fly.
In this analogy, the flying car would also be built by an industry whose wanton folly just killed over 650,000 people in the U.S. alone. Nah hard pass from me, but again like Johnny 5 still looking for more input so keep it coming.
originally posted by: ToLiveIsToDie
originally posted by: HawkEyi
a reply to: flice
"The Benefits Outweigh The Risks"
You got a link that outlines and explains the benefits?
originally posted by: nonspecific
It's insane that some people won't trust their own GP but will put the lives of their entire family in the hands of some random "doctor" on a video that tells them really outlandish things backed up by absolutely no evidence.
It's Darwinism for the year 2021.
a reply to: andy06shake
originally posted by: AutomateThis1v2
originally posted by: ToLiveIsToDie
originally posted by: HawkEyi
a reply to: flice
"The Benefits Outweigh The Risks"
You got a link that outlines and explains the benefits?
What are you? some kind of science denier?
originally posted by: flice
originally posted by: ToLiveIsToDie
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: ToLiveIsToDie
My problem with it, is that we are been told from officals that it is 100% total safe and nothing bad can ever come from it.
Thats simply not true, there are no absolutes, I never heard that anywhere. There is always the risk of side effects, now they may be described as minimal, or rare..but 100% safe..never heard that.
Well, it may not be true to you, but i have heard it plenty of times.
Only the sith deals in absolutes
Which always made me chuckle because Yoda said: "Do or do not... there is no try" ;P
STAR WARS THE STORY OF AN ORPHANED BOY WHO BECOMES RADICALIZED AFTER A MILITARY STRIKE KILLS HIS FAMILY. HE IS INDOCTRINATED INTO AN ANCIENT RELIGION, JOINS A BAND OF REBEL INSURGENTS, AND CARRIES OUT A TERRORIST ATTACK KILLING 300,000 PEOPLE.
originally posted by: GolgothaBridge
a reply to: AutomateThis1v2
I suggest not trusting elitists; be it religious, political or even medical. Do your own research. My research has assured me that the covid vaccines from Pfizer and Modern are mostly safe, and I got it. Just because you were told what others told them over years in a school mean nothing to me. I do have an engineering degree, so I'm not just anti-education or anything, just pro-study and pro-thinking.
originally posted by: ToLiveIsToDie
originally posted by: AutomateThis1v2
originally posted by: ToLiveIsToDie
originally posted by: HawkEyi
a reply to: flice
"The Benefits Outweigh The Risks"
You got a link that outlines and explains the benefits?
What are you? some kind of science denier?
Show me the science that proves science is real
originally posted by: ToLiveIsToDie
originally posted by: flice
originally posted by: ToLiveIsToDie
originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: ToLiveIsToDie
My problem with it, is that we are been told from officals that it is 100% total safe and nothing bad can ever come from it.
Thats simply not true, there are no absolutes, I never heard that anywhere. There is always the risk of side effects, now they may be described as minimal, or rare..but 100% safe..never heard that.
Well, it may not be true to you, but i have heard it plenty of times.
Only the sith deals in absolutes
Which always made me chuckle because Yoda said: "Do or do not... there is no try" ;P
Me too guess Yoda was the greatest and most secret Sith Lord of them all
I love this description of the movies
STAR WARS THE STORY OF AN ORPHANED BOY WHO BECOMES RADICALIZED AFTER A MILITARY STRIKE KILLS HIS FAMILY. HE IS INDOCTRINATED INTO AN ANCIENT RELIGION, JOINS A BAND OF REBEL INSURGENTS, AND CARRIES OUT A TERRORIST ATTACK KILLING 300,000 PEOPLE.
originally posted by: Imperator2
Pretty sure that's what good little comrades are supposed to do. Someone in authority tells him what he has to have done to his body and how could he ever disagree? After all that person has degrees that prove how much more intelligent they are than him. They are also in a position of trusted authority so they must always be correct on these matters.
I mean have you ever once heard of a misdiagnosis, medical mistake or unneccessary procedure? Surely you have not and if you have it was clearly misinformation. /sarc
Honestly he'd probably have a limb removed over a paper cut based on a doctor's recommendation. Not sure people like him could ever go against authority.
a reply to: shaemac