posted on Aug, 14 2021 @ 11:47 PM
It is a good video. He has the expertise and is saying that this vaccine was not tested like it should be and that the side effects are unacceptable
for a vaccine. He also states they have found multiple ways to treat people for covid even before this vaccine was approved for emergency use, so it
should never have been given emergency use classification.
I see Fauchi and the CDC saying this vaccine is perfectly safe and effective...but don't hear that said by the pharma companies who made it. They do
say it is ninety five percent effective at preventing covid forming from the virus, but remember, eighty percent of people who get this SARS-CoV-2
virus are never at risk of getting a bad case, and only five percent may wind up in the hospital classified as the covid disease. Now remember,
ninety five percent of that five percent is what the vaccine makers are claiming is the effectiveness. Not ninety five percent of all people. And as
this guy says, they now have lots of medicines they could use to lessen the risk of covid happening from this virus. The vaccine has killed more
people than would have previously been allowed to gain approval too.
I did not see any lies in what he said in the video, he was careful not to tell lies. He was just informing people of the risks of this vaccine,
especially the mRNA vaccines....because there was not enough testing to prove their safety. He is not an antivaxer, he seems to think real vaccines
are beneficial but does not approve of this vaccine because it was warp speed.
These people are more into medicines to stop the virus, I am more into consuming the basis of the medicines, the method of action they are using for
these medicines they are researching is what I look for and verify the bioavailability of them in natural sources. I backward hack the pharma meds
they say work to see where their medicine knowledge comes from and find evidence of the viability of the natural chemicals they are based off of...and
try to identify how much is needed and how often it needs to be taken for. All the research has been done and most is in the NIH databases in respect
to it's use on covid treatment...they needed to do that almost immediately to be able to find what medicines might work..it is simpler and more cost
effective to do that than start testing every medicine...they needed method of action to be known. They did not randomly test every medicine created,
they used natural sources and knowledge of natural anti-viral chemistry to identify which medicines might work or could be altered to work.
The scientists at pharmaceutical companies are good at what they do...I just do not like them not being able to tell the people about natural sources
of these medical method of actions. One good thing is that the research info is available if the smart people want to look it up and if they know how
to interpret it correctly, often correlations are not cause and effect, just coincidences and you have to know how to translate it correctly, another
thing most people have not enough experience at.
edit on 14-8-2021 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)