posted on Aug, 14 2021 @ 08:22 AM
I drill down into the material until I find the actual source of the information provided. Too often I find I have to drill down 3 or 4 levels to find
the quoted source, sometimes I can't even find that. An article, if they provide a source, will quote another article, that quotes another, and then
another. If I can't drill down to the original source material I give up and assume there is no solid source to refer to and file it into the BS
bin.
When I find the original source I then compare that with other sources that refute that information, then drill down into that. I then compare the
original sources and determine which is more believable based on how much I trust the source or if it is based on some flawed logic or arguement. If
I'm uncertain I may go deeper to see who is responsible for those sources or where they get their funding, although after going that deep, it becomes
obvious who is pushing an agenda and who is presenting "facts" in as an unbiased way as possible.
At that point it becomes a matter of my own opinion on who is being more honest in there reports based on what I have found to that point.
ETA: Memes are the worst for me. I have to type in the subject from the graphic and other related information to determine the source. I'll often put
up the link when I find it, some people like my self appreciate that. Otherwise you just have some information you have to take at face value and
usually it is presented to cause an emotional reaction.
edit on 14-8-2021 by MichiganSwampBuck because: Added extra comments