It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: shaemac
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: shaemac
There are actual videos of Capitol police letting people in by moving fences, opening doors, escorting them to the chambers, standing around doing literally nothing while actual Trump supporters are BEGGING them to do something, Capitol police standing around talking with actual members of antifa and giving them the OK, antifa members changing into Trump clothing, Trump members calling out antifa people yelling at them to STOP breaking windows.........so on and so forth. Lots of evidence of posts across the chans planning to show up in Trump gear and blend in with Trump supporters.
Trump asking for the National Guard to deployed, and Nancy saying NO.
The evidence is enormous that this was planned by leftists domestic terrorists and no matter how hard the left TRIES to pin it on Trump and his supporters, they will continue to fail. There is just not enough evidence to support their wishes.
A president who cannot compel the national guard off their ass, and allows his staff to eschew their duty to the capitol building, and fails to guard the integrity of Congressional procedure, really isn't much of a president.
It was out of Trump's hands. But you know this. Capitol Police literally let people into the building and escorted them around. There is plenty of video showing this.
None of this is Trump's fault.
originally posted by: MetalThunder
Just so its not glossed over...
John Sullivan: Antifa Member Caught Disguising Himself as Trump Supporter, Inciting Violence at the Capitol
In the aftermath of the storming of the U.S. Capitol by Trump supporters on Jan. 6, new video footage has emerged on social media, showing Antifa activist John Sullivan inciting violence at the federal building under the garb of a Trump supporter.
Sullivan, who was arrested by authorities on Thursday, told Fox News in an interview last week that he was at the protest in the capacity of a video journalist and to film what was happening but did not actively participate in the attack. "It's just recording, solely, and not being active in it," he said.
.....
Congressman Reveals What He Said and Did to Officer Who Shot Ashli Babbitt
originally posted by: TzarChasm
A president who cannot compel the national guard off their ass, and allows his staff to eschew their duty to the capitol building, and fails to guard the integrity of Congressional procedure, really isn't much of a president.
originally posted by: MDDoxs
a reply to: carewemust
Interesting! Thank you for the update.
Subpoenas are only granted if there is sufficient evidence and just cause. Looks like there may be more intent behind the Jan 6 insurrection than originally thought!
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: MDDoxs
a reply to: carewemust
Interesting! Thank you for the update.
Subpoenas are only granted if there is sufficient evidence and just cause. Looks like there may be more intent behind the Jan 6 insurrection than originally thought!
Democrats in Congress send out subpoenas so frequently, their significance has been diminished greatly. The very thought of a "Congressional subpoena" used to scare people. Not anymore.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
a reply to: MDDoxs
Bunch of BS. The article references Salon.....that should be a quick BS alarm.
The article you linked to even says the people were her mom and sons and a capitol security officer.
So no.....no conspiracy. This person had no power at the time to do anything....still has no power to do much of anything.
Whatever happened was pretty tame....as far as "insurrections" go.....though I wouldn't put this in that category. Only snowflakes put it in that category....those that have never seen what a real insurrection looks like, one that is actually violent with thousands of angry people....this wasn't that.
Anywho....I think the author of that article is clearly biased and just trying to get hits. Why you may ask? The simple start of one paragraph stating a "maskless officer" accompanied them. Please let me know what point in any of the article that this particular distinction makes any sense with the story.....bias and crap writing.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: MDDoxs
a reply to: carewemust
Interesting! Thank you for the update.
Subpoenas are only granted if there is sufficient evidence and just cause. Looks like there may be more intent behind the Jan 6 insurrection than originally thought!
Democrats in Congress send out subpoenas so frequently, their significance has been diminished greatly. The very thought of a "Congressional subpoena" used to scare people. Not anymore.