It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
a reply to: putnam6
Glad you proved to yourself that it was there.....know let's move to the more important issues.
So if you had a drug that treated cancer with exactly all these possible side effects it would still be your choice to take it ?
So why is the COVID vaccine so different ?
Just because it's contagious doesn't change anything, my body my choice.
originally posted by: putnam6
you mean this
www.fda.gov...
FWIW I believe the vaccine narrative is BS however FWIW I watched the guy's presentation, it's easy to pull up the video where he is and watch it. There wasn't one instance where that list popped up.
If you can find it please point it out
again for what it is worth here I believe is that person's final report..
www.bestinitiative.org...
originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
This was a screen grab from a presentation that popped on the screen for like 2 seconds and then was quickly taken down.
But once on the internet it's out. From October of last year.
Notice the very last one, "Vaccine Enhanced Disease"
If all the other ones aren't bad enough look what else it can do.
Known as VAED
This is why the FDA still hasn't approved this.
originally posted by: Butterfinger
"Pregnancy and birth outcomes"
It gets you pregnant?
Phrasing people
Dubioys evidence? Aside from all the reports on the media???
originally posted by: putnam6
originally posted by: FreeOrigin
a reply to: putnam6
2:33:40
but that was in Oct and representative of historically documented AEs noted during vaccination.
Yep, I finally found it, but it seems like dubious evidence still, again most adverse events listed are on the final report .pdf.
Id love to find evidence of stuff just don't think this is it
originally posted by: putnam6
originally posted by: Chance321
a reply to: Blue_Jay33
Found this, it's a little more on what you already posted. I'd suggest doing a screen capture of this before it too disappears.
ussanews.com... isease-death/
Possible adverse reactions shown in the FDA’s “working list” include: Guillain-Barré syndrome Acute disseminated encephaloymelitis (“Characterized by a brief but widespread attack of inflammation in the brain and spinal cord that damages myelin – the protective covering of nerve fibers,” according to NIH.) Transverse myelitis Encephalitis/myelitis/encephalomyelitis/meningoencephalitis/meningitis/encepholaphathy Convulsions/seizures Stroke Narcolepsy and cataplexy Anaphlyaxis Acute myocardial infarction Myocarditis/pericarditis Autoimmune disease Deaths Pregnancy and birth outcomes Other acute demyelinating diseases Non-anaphylactic allergic reactions Thrombocytopenia Disseminated intravascular coagulation Venous thromboembolism Arthritis and arthralgia/joint pain Kawasaki disease Vaccine enhanced disease The list also notes “Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children” as one possible outcome following vaccination.
Yeah, I don't want any part of playing lab rat, I'll pass.
Don't get me wrong I'm not getting vaccinated any time soon if ever.
In the context of the 8-hour multi-person presentation, we are discussing one slide of this guy's presentation, it was just a suggestion of things to possibly look for in regards to adverse events. In other words, they were just spitballing ideas. Don't think it's a smoking gun to anything.
originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
a reply to: putnam6
[SNIP] my body my choice.
originally posted by: flice
originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
This was a screen grab from a presentation that popped on the screen for like 2 seconds and then was quickly taken down.
But once on the internet it's out. From October of last year.
Notice the very last one, "Vaccine Enhanced Disease"
If all the other ones aren't bad enough look what else it can do.
Known as VAED
This is why the FDA still hasn't approved this.
This is exactly what is going on in vaccinated people:
Potential explanations of this increased susceptibility to HIV infection in the vaccinees included the lack of an HIV-Env antigen in the vaccine, with the possibility that the HIV immune response induced by the vaccine potentially induced attachment of HIV to cellular surface, but without killing or neutralizing the virus, thus enabling viral entry into the cell.