The Real (Theoretical) Truth About The "Covid" vaccine

a reply to: rikgrimsby

Those top-ups are because the body is addicted to it, needs it to survive it has nothing to do with a any virus anymore.

It's easier to say there's another virus instead of telling 70% of the world we were wrong now your body is addicted to coc aine.

So those booster shots will be placeholders u til they can figure out how to ween the body back into producing non-spiked antibodies. Which will eventually lead to strokes, and death. I wouldn't be surprised if we develope a shortage of blood thinners sooner then we care to admit.

But we are about to lose a major percent of the population this winter due to their stunted immune systems, and those that decide not to get the booster shots.. I look forward to eating lamb.

a reply to: DBCowboy

They should also make sure their medical professional isn't pocketing 80$ a shot, and aren't politically motivated.

a reply to: kykweer
I aint gonna hold your hand on this, you were walking around willingly with a blind fold and plugs in your ears.

Google father of Rna technology. Robert Malone. There's 1,000s of videos just watch them.. then watch him get sensored despite the huge paycheck he's getting for his tech.. which becomes less if people don't get it. (Keep in mind he gets paid when. You get the injection, so it's rare for someone getting the big bucks for treatments to speak out against them).


He's not the only one(I just forget the other guys names, tbh since I already made my choice it wasn't much of a consequence to me, and those who got vaxed already it's to late for them, those on the fence will hold out til winter at least where # will hit the fan)...

Find his podcast, where he speaks out against the mass vaccinations and the fact the studies are suggesting the reliance. Heads of pfizer, moderna and more have all come out over the years and spoke out against mass vaccination due to dangers. Because every previous trial resulted in 100% death rates.(Which if you check Google you will see brand new articles countering these claims.. with older links available on other search engines with the facts listed from as early as 2005 when 35 Chinese took the experimental vaccine and died. 120+ cats in the 90s again died move in the 50/60s died all within 2-4 years when a challenger virus spike/protein was exposed to them.).

On average it takes 4years to be exposed to another virus with a spike protein. So it's easy to dispute the science("other conditions..") in that time frame. Even though all participants of the vaccine trials results were the same. This had been the only thing consistent until they started to rewrite history.

(If you fact-check these claims, make sure you verify dates/locations/names anything that can easily be swapped. Because what was true in 1952 is false in 1953, what is true in china in 1888 is false if it's HK cause of seperation, they do this #
to manipulate results for the agenda. )

Even the nephew of JFK has spoken out against this. JFK was literally murdered for being the people's president.

But for those who have been isolating.. and are NOT injected.. I suggest you start exposing yourself to sick people. So go volunteer at a children's/cancer ward, help the homeless. Build up your natural immune system. Roll around in the grass, eat dirt, take a swim in a public swimming pool.. whatever get your body exposed to the world.

a reply to: BlackArrow

"Because the creators (yes every company selling the vaccine has came out and said this) of the vaccines, specifically stated. "DO NOT MASS VACCINATE THE PUBLIC". But you were to busy in line for the vaccine to get the memo."

Hey man, hit me with a source for this, would ya please?

originally posted by: Themaskedbeast
a reply to: kykweer

Why on earth would anyone agree to get injected with a non fda approved gene therapy is beyond me.

The FDA has approved them for emergency use:

Emergency Use Authorization

None of the vaccines are gene therapies:

Gene therapy From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The long term effects are unknown

They are known to be very, very similar to the the short-term effects.

to a virus that has a 99.7% survivability rate.

The survivablility rate is very closely related to the case fatality ratio. Worldwide, there have been 198,894,515 cases and 4,235,461 deaths. This leads to a survivability rate of 97.87% but it varies slightly by region. This means that out of every 100 people, two die. In the USA, survivability rate is 98.25%, so out of 100, only 1.7 people die

(one of them probably by being only 0.7 of a person ).

Every mRna based vaccine has failed animal testing as all the animals died after encountering a wild corona virus.

Covid-19 vaccine did not kill every animal it was tested on

Also, SARS-CoV-2 is a human hosted virus. It doesn't seem to cause problems for other species, so I'm not sure why they would die from a disease that they can't catch?

YOU ARE THE EXPERIMENT!!!!

How exciting!

As to why you dont think they would kill the useless eaters that is funny.

Think about it if you wanted to reduce the population who would you want left the useless eaters? or the innovators the ones who make things work the ones who invent.

The answer is clear you eliminate the useless eaters so the world can thrive through innovation and new technologies that the useless eaters cannot fathom.

So do you think you are a useless eater?

But, you know, if 'they' got rid of the guys who collect the garbage and take it to the tip for them, they'd have to do it for themselves.
Clearly, 'they' haven't thought this through...

a reply to: LSU2018
That is an interesting response, so you believe we should leave it up to the immune system to fight the virus. I can only assume that you don't really believe in medicine.

Do you think the fatality rate would have stayed the same if people were not hospitalized as they were or would it have increased significantly. In this case 3-4 out of 100 dying would be significant imo.

originally posted by: kykweer
a reply to: Themaskedbeast
Sadly no, you can truly do what you want to do. It's more a question. If "they" wanted to get rid of anyone why would it be the "sheeple"?

Sheeple do as their told, they're not as entertaining. Opting out of their game play however, is highly advisable.

Imagine that you think you own the Earth and the human population is just a means of labour for your benifit. Then you realise their are too many of them and they will have to be culled, you of course rule by fear but always the fear of something else , because your survival requires that they dont know you exist. You want to kill of a good few and keep the fittest, a disease is a great idea , to get people linning up to have a shot in the arm of the real bioweapon.Which would take down the immune system, and just leave the fittest to breed. A few will die of the shot but that wont panic them, it would have to be slow die off of various diseases which is what would happen if the immune system was shot. It could be thats why nothing is being done to fix the economy, simply because when there are less people it will fix itself.
Well this is a conspirivy site.

a reply to: Themaskedbeast

It's not gene therapy, and has been authorized for use. It will be approved in the near future, it's a guarantee. What will your reason be then?

With that said, if you don't want it don't get it, no idea why some people are so crazed about forcing others.

a reply to: BlackArrow

Wow, whole lot of crazy in this post. There is no addiction. I have no idea what your comment about spiked antibodies and coc aine addiction means. Too much bitchute and believing things on the internet it seems.

originally posted by: Themaskedbeast
a reply to: kykweer

Why on earth would anyone agree to get injected with a non fda approved gene therapy is beyond me.

The long term effects are unknown to a virus that has a 99.7% survivability rate.

Every mRna based vaccine has failed animal testing as all the animals died after encountering a wild corona virus.

YOU ARE THE EXPERIMENT!!!!

As to why you dont think they would kill the useless eaters that is funny.

Think about it if you wanted to reduce the population who would you want left the useless eaters? or the innovators the ones who make things work the ones who invent.

The answer is clear you eliminate the useless eaters so the world can thrive through innovation and new technologies that the useless eaters cannot fathom.

how can you guarantee that you are not part of the experiment?

originally posted by: rickymouse
I see way more conservatives taking the vaccine around here than liberals. Liberal people don't believe there is enough evidence. Remember, liberals are the far right and far and hard left, they want change. Conservatives believe in the medical industry and in specialists like Fauchi, most believe that this vaccine is safe and effective.

I do not know how it is in other places around the country, I only see what is around here.

What part of the country do you live in? I don't know any Conservative that believes in anything Fauci says, nor do they trust a rushed vaccine. Some may, but most do not.

originally posted by: kykweer
a reply to: Skada

Relax, it was not a jab, read his previous post about vaxers wanting people to die. I'm not like that is all I'm saying.

I have a Newsbreak app and every time a coronavirus article pops up, many of the posts are people hoping the unvaccinated people die. On my wife's (she's a millennial but doesn't claim her generation) facebook, it's loaded with girls she went to school with that are posting utterly retardical posts like "Stop being so selfish and get vaccinated so I can live MY life!" I kid you not, people out there are really that stupid. These people run out and get vaccinated so they don't have to worry about anything and then immediately start worrying about everyone else that didn't do what these people did. It's the dumbest thing. Just live your life how you see fit and stop telling other people how to live theirs. It's very simple, even more simple than the minds of these people.

If the elites wanted population control they wouldn't use a modified cold virus with a 99% survival rate. Like a million better and easier ways to go about it.

a reply to: chr0naut

They're "known" to be similar to the short term effects???

Do you even stop for one second to think about that? How long has this vaccine been out, about 7 months? Do you understand that that means there's not a single person on this Earth who can tell what the side effects will be 8 months after the vaccine? You're literally not giving two sh##s of a critical thought.

originally posted by: kykweer
a reply to: LSU2018
That is an interesting response, so you believe we should leave it up to the immune system to fight the virus. I can only assume that you don't really believe in medicine.

Do you think the fatality rate would have stayed the same if people were not hospitalized as they were or would it have increased significantly. In this case 3-4 out of 100 dying would be significant imo.

No, I said I'll leave it up to MY immune system. I couldn't care less how you approach it, that's on you. My problem is all of the people who judge others for not doing what you did.

I believe in proven medicine that's been out long enough to show long term statistics, and don't give me that "but doctors say" BS because a doctor are clueless about what you'll experience 1 year after the shot. I don't know what happened to common sense and critical thinking, but I guess if that was still a prevalent concept then we wouldn't be in this mess having this redundant argument.

I can't tell you what would have happened if people weren't hospitalized, but I can tell you that in November 2019 my father-in-law was down for three weeks with some kind of virus that was flu-like but tested negative for the flu (and everything else) so he was sent home with Dr's orders to take severe cold medicine and Afrin so he could breathe because he couldn't smell or taste anything and had a hard time breathing. His health wasn't good at all either. He passed it to his wife, too, and she was down for two weeks and taking the same kind of meds. If you think fear and panic haven't heavily contributed to all of this then you're not thinking logically.

originally posted by: LSU2018

originally posted by: kykweer
a reply to: Skada

Relax, it was not a jab, read his previous post about vaxers wanting people to die. I'm not like that is all I'm saying.

I have a Newsbreak app and every time a coronavirus article pops up, many of the posts are people hoping the unvaccinated people die. On my wife's (she's a millennial but doesn't claim her generation) facebook, it's loaded with girls she went to school with that are posting utterly retardical posts like "Stop being so selfish and get vaccinated so I can live MY life!" I kid you not, people out there are really that stupid. These people run out and get vaccinated so they don't have to worry about anything and then immediately start worrying about everyone else that didn't do what these people did. It's the dumbest thing. Just live your life how you see fit and stop telling other people how to live theirs. It's very simple, even more simple than the minds of these people.

I may question people's reasons especially when the likes of people on bitchute like to claim that "they" are forcing people to get vaccinated through fear. But those types often have intense music and threats of the dangers etc.

From MY perspective I might not understand people fear of vaccines other than probably we don't know the long term effects etc. But superficially referring to the OP, why would "they" use vaccines as a form of population control (however widely its believed) when it would make more sense to kill off all the "sheeple" while keeping the anti vaxers around as a show of power. It's dumb.

But if you don't want to take it it's your choice, personally I just want to back to normal, I wasn't to go on my year delayed honeymoon without even thinking that my faffing around could kill 0.3 out of a 100 people, it's my own consciousness.

originally posted by: Themaskedbeast
a reply to: kykweer

Why on earth would anyone agree to get injected with a non fda approved gene therapy is beyond me.

The long term effects are unknown to a virus that has a 99.7% survivability rate.

Every mRna based vaccine has failed animal testing as all the animals died after encountering a wild corona virus.

YOU ARE THE EXPERIMENT!!!!

As to why you dont think they would kill the useless eaters that is funny.

Think about it if you wanted to reduce the population who would you want left the useless eaters? or the innovators the ones who make things work the ones who invent.

The answer is clear you eliminate the useless eaters so the world can thrive through innovation and new technologies that the useless eaters cannot fathom.

I mean I read this type of response everyday but it's comical.

originally posted by: jjkenobi
If the elites wanted population control they wouldn't use a modified cold virus with a 99% survival rate. Like a million better and easier ways to go about it.

B-B-B-bingo!