Reluctant to be vaccinated for COVID-19? Here are six myths you can put to rest

Here is how the MSM/Media are trying to convince the un vaccinated to get vaccinated. There are six myths you can put to rest by the theconversation and i have to state some of the points they are missing the points..


According to the story a very short there are six myths about the vaccines and you can put to rest with the media's trusting debunking. However even these six lists that they are trying to debunk is comical bad.


And as usual in their article they just cant get rid off their favorite word

the benefits of being vaccinated outweigh the risks

"The the benefits outweigh the risks"

Reluctant to be vaccinated for COVID-19? Here are six myths you can put to rest

This is untrue. The overall makeup of the placental protein is very different from the coronavirus spike protein. Additionally, during the Pfizer vaccine tests, 23 women volunteers became pregnant after taking the vaccine. Furthermore, the benefits of being vaccinated outweigh the risks of infection for pregnant women.

If this is true what the article is claiming then why a number of pregnant women i had read about online somewhere are reporting heavy periods?

Myth 3: COVID-19 vaccine side-effects are dangerous

dont worry the vaccines are safe.
According to the experts...

This risk-benefit decision is left to the individual to make, but vaccinations have been proven to be safe

They are doing everything they can to stop anyone who has had a bad experience or disagrees with the propaganda about the Vaccines. Are they good...are they bad for some people... It does not matter as it is your body and your decision whether to get the jab or not. I keep waiting for one more mutated strain bigger and better than Delta for them to have to start all over again....hey it could happen...

originally posted by: HawkEyi
Here is how the MSM/Media are trying to convince the un vaccinated to get vaccinated. There are six myths you can put to rest by the theconversation and i have to state some of the points they are missing the points..


According to the story a very short there are six myths about the vaccines and you can put to rest with the media's trusting debunking. However even these six lists that they are trying to debunk is comical bad.


And as usual in their article they just cant get rid off their favorite word

the benefits of being vaccinated outweigh the risks

"The the benefits outweigh the risks"

Reluctant to be vaccinated for COVID-19? Here are six myths you can put to rest

This is untrue. The overall makeup of the placental protein is very different from the coronavirus spike protein. Additionally, during the Pfizer vaccine tests, 23 women volunteers became pregnant after taking the vaccine. Furthermore, the benefits of being vaccinated outweigh the risks of infection for pregnant women.

If this is true what the article is claiming then why a number of pregnant women i had read about online somewhere are reporting heavy periods?

Myth 3: COVID-19 vaccine side-effects are dangerous

dont worry the vaccines are safe.
According to the experts...

This risk-benefit decision is left to the individual to make, but vaccinations have been proven to be safe

Ive heard some miscarriages after the vax and of heavy periods after the vax. These things are normal, common events. Id like to see a comparison, with non-vaxed, and with covid sufferers.

the biggest myth and IMO most easily disproven due to the INFORMATION PAGE they give you for the vaccine (in my case the monderna one but the other pfizer one says almost the same thing) is that it "HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE FDA/ PROVEN SAFE BY THE FDA"

the paperwork for the one I took clearly stated it was NOT MEDICALLY APPROVED but it was given "EMERGENCY USE APPROVAL" by the FDA , gave VERY LOW NUMBERS of "test subjects" (less than 10,000 if memory serves but could be slightly higher or lower), the safety claims were based on them getting ONLY ONE SHOT , no data on one getting two shots and the biggest eye opener was in the last line...

the approval was based on (direct quote) "it doing more good than harm"
let me say this again because when i first read it i was stunned mind lock
IT DOING MORE GOOD THAN HARM

Now we keep hearing from the "must vaccinate" crowd and the famous dr fauci that its "fda approved and proven safe"

their own damn literature states otherwise...

look i am not saying you should or should not get it .
i got it because i knew my work would require it soon (despite their claims) and i cant afford to loose my job .

but lets end this MYTH that it was PROVEN/APPROVED by the FDA

scrounger

a reply to: HawkEyi

99.97% survival rate with the average symptoms being a mild fever for a few days.

Why again is a vaccine "necessary"?

I just love how every one of the six 'myths' and explainations are carefully worded to not provide actual facts or just give wrong information. It is like they are copying a script or something.

But scientists believe that the vaccine provides better protection than natural infection.

Funny, I understood science to work in facts and not beliefs. Is it now a religon?

but vaccinations have been proven to be safe.

Strange, that setatment says nothing about this one.

Myth 5: The COVID-19 vaccine development was rushed, so it may not be effective

They say to put your mask back on to protect yourself and others. It's not working.

originally posted by: Type1338
a reply to: HawkEyi

99.97% survival rate with the average symptoms being a mild fever for a few days.

Why again is a vaccine "necessary"?

Exactly this. When I had it I went to the hospital for chest pain, they tend to be adamant about people going to doctors for chest pain. Then mild fever symptoms for maybe 2 or 3 days. I even asked the doc if I should get vaccinated. He was like "with your heart? Definitely not!" Am I at risk? "I wouldn't say so."

Thanks and a nod and on my way.

a reply to: sine.nomine


whats also ironic (IMO also leading to their "overwork" and lack of supplies) is they treat EVERYONE who even remotely has a symptom that "could" be covid/covid sign and treating them like they were an infected in a "outbreak" movie.

hell even if they have a "positive test" they still treat them like they are gonna spew and turn everyone into a zombie.

how about a RATIONAL reaction to a patient dealing in FACTS not "speculation"

ESPECIALLY given that unless some compromise like yourself with your heart or a chemo patient (for two of many examples) that 99.97% survival rate with the average symptoms being a mild fever for a few days.
scrounger

Here is a group of doctors discussing how certain COVID shots cause blood clots. In his test 62% have developed blood clots within two weeks of getting the shot. A lay person can understand what he is saying and why the clots are being formed.
youtu.be...

a reply to: beyondknowledge

Strange how the MSM always debunks the claims that CTs were talking about microchips in the vaxs which is absurd. I am pretty sure some of them were talking about the vaccination passports.

And i am agaisnt covid vaccination passports.

Here's an interesting thought to ponder... it takes 12 years for a vaccine to reach full approval status.. and a whopping 2 percent finally make the grade.

I'm sure all these new fan dangle jabaroos will be just fine and dandy.

a reply to: Village Idiot

Always stick to the tried and true. A can of chicken noodle soup, Dayquil, and sprite.

originally posted by: Village Idiot
Here's an interesting thought to ponder... it takes 12 years for a vaccine to reach full approval status.. and a whopping 2 percent finally make the grade.

I'm sure all these new fan dangle jabaroos will be just fine and dandy.

how about all three clearly state (seen it on two directly info sheet) that the vaccine is NOT FDA APPROVED BUT EMERGENCY USE APPROVED...
both for adults and children 12 years and above...

it doesnt get ANY MORE BLUNT than that outside of an ad campaign on prime time tv/streaming.

hell even the FDA states this and even states at this time wont even approve emergency use for under 12 due to "concerns"

yet we have about every news outlet, democratic (and some republican ) politicians, and even fauci himself claiming its "fda approved" safe...

if we are not at 1984 ministry of truth we damn near one step away...


scrounger

if you've had covid and or you're below the age of 60, the benefits absolutely don't outweigh the risks

originally posted by: Type1338
a reply to: HawkEyi

99.97% survival rate with the average symptoms being a mild fever for a few days.

Why again is a vaccine "necessary"?

Even if was 90% survival with symptoms that gave you the Aztec two-step and projectile vomiting for a few days, it is hardly an ELE. I survived a "flu" like that in Feb 2020, probably have had less than a dozen of those in my lifetime, even if you include the "Mother of All Hangovers" on that list.

If the jab was time tested, proven safe and effective and prevents the spread, then it would make more sense IMO. Just reducing the symptoms without reducing the spread while adding the risk of adverse reactions including death makes zero sense to me.

a reply to: HawkEyi

I read online somewhere that the earth is flat.


Anything can be written online, doesn't make it true. Do you really believe everything you red online. Actually your anti vax so probably...

a reply to: HawkEyi

I am 72 and I got a chance to be vaccinated by our local Fire Department; they made it easy - the came to me. I got 2 shots a month apart; the only side effects I had are; I was very tired and thirsty for 2 days; that is all.

I think people are trying but some are just plain afraid.

originally posted by: sine.nomine
a reply to: Village Idiot

Always stick to the tried and true. A can of chicken noodle soup, Dayquil, and sprite.

Ahh, DIY works pretty damn well for me, too. I've found that steeping a chunked up habanero in chicken broth to be one of the single most effective ways for me to go from feeling like dung to being on the mend. They're high in vites A & C, and with the capsaicin, make sense as an effective anti-inflammatory immune booster. Then the broth itself is already packed with a ton of good stuff (especially if it's homemade) so adding a swift spicy kick to the ass is like a little turbo boost, I wager.

The china virus shots were no mean to last for full immunity more than a few months and the need for boosters was always on the table.

This is a money making scam and is paying greatly to the big pharma pockets now expected profits to reach 22 billions before the year is over and up to 42 billions next year, soo now you have it, that is why they need to keep pushing the covid rhetoric.

We are nothing but milking cows.

Companies making big money from COVID-19 vaccinesFirms profiting from COVID-19 vaccines
Manufacturing and distributing effective vaccinations against COVID-19 has been heralded as the only way out of the pandemic and the race is on to get as many doses produced as possible. With demand through the roof, producing these life-saving drugs has become a lucrative business, and the global coronavirus vaccine market will reach an enormous value of $35 billion in 2021 and is expected to grow to $42 billion by 2022, according to Arizton. But who is that money going to? Click or scroll through to find out which companies are making billions from producing COVID-19 vaccines, ranked in order of the number of doses they are set to produce.

www.msn.com...

Yes, is all about our well being and our safety, big pharma and the media can kiss my latino rear end.

People needs to wake up to the deception of manufactured diseases and forced treatments on people for profits.

I would tell a joke about Covid deaths but 99.97% of people wouldn't get it.
Boom boom!