CDC to Replace Its PCR Test With One That Can Differentiate Between CCP Virus and Flu

The CDC is now admitting the reason for the demise of the common flu over the past year and a half. Most here probably already knew this. It's interesting that we've been told over the past several months that all of the authorized multi-analyte panels cover SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A and B but what they didn't tell you is that the tests couldn't differentiate between them.

I guess the drug companies want to start selling you both the flu AND the COVID vaccines now!

yournews.com...

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will no longer recommend its PCR test to detect the CCP virus, saying that it will withdraw the test’s emergency use authorization (EUA), and instead, encourage labs to use a multiplex assay that can detect and differentiate the virus from the flu.

“Given the availability of commercial options, CDC intends to discontinue support for the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019 nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2,” Jasmine Reed, public affairs specialist at the CDC, told The Epoch Times via email.

Read it again. Then keep reading it until you understand it. This has been debunked probably 100 times on reddit in the last few days.

a reply to: LordAhriman

Why don't you explain it then? I don't do Reddit.

originally posted by: Iamonlyhuman
a reply to: LordAhriman

Why don't you explain it then? I don't do Reddit.

They came up with a new test that can detect covid and influenza. The tests they're moving away from could only detect covid. If it came back negative, they would have to do another test to see if someone had the flu. It saves time and money to do a 2 for 1 test, so they're recommending everyone start using the new test as we move into flu season. Nowhere, anywhere, does it say that the old test was showing the flu as covid. It's not possible. Influenza viruses have very little in common and covid PCR tests are looking for a very specific rna that has nothing in common with a flu virus.

a reply to: LordAhriman

Those tests they were using couldn't even really detect COVID as we think of it though. They detected viral fragments. A viral fragment says nothing about active disease process.

The PCR test might be able to tell you if you can into contact with bits of the virus, but it cannot tell you if that's because you actually are sick or just came into contact with someone who was at some point and is in the normal process of shedding viral bits that can no longer pose a threat to anyone.

Both things will cause positive PCR tests.

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: Iamonlyhuman
a reply to: LordAhriman

Why don't you explain it then? I don't do Reddit.

They came up with a new test that can detect covid and influenza. The tests they're moving away from could only detect covid. If it came back negative, they would have to do another test to see if someone had the flu. It saves time and money to do a 2 for 1 test, so they're recommending everyone start using the new test as we move into flu season. Nowhere, anywhere, does it say that the old test was showing the flu as covid. It's not possible. Influenza viruses have very little in common and covid PCR tests are looking for a very specific rna that has nothing in common with a flu virus.

They came up with a new test that can detect covid and influenza

And falsely identifying dead COVID cells as active , thus making some false positives.
You forgot the rest of the story .

originally posted by: LordAhriman
Read it again. Then keep reading it until you understand it. This has been debunked probably 100 times on reddit in the last few days.

So has the theory of an oblate spheroid Earth .

originally posted by: LordAhriman

originally posted by: Iamonlyhuman
a reply to: LordAhriman

Why don't you explain it then? I don't do Reddit.

They came up with a new test that can detect covid and influenza. The tests they're moving away from could only detect covid. If it came back negative, they would have to do another test to see if someone had the flu. It saves time and money to do a 2 for 1 test, so they're recommending everyone start using the new test as we move into flu season. Nowhere, anywhere, does it say that the old test was showing the flu as covid. It's not possible. Influenza viruses have very little in common and covid PCR tests are looking for a very specific rna that has nothing in common with a flu virus.

so if what you say is true, then we have eliminated the flu totally from our society and no longer need to worry about it. This new test is pointless. Unless you are full of sh!t.

Soo in other words now more people will be testing positive for covid, will this include those that got the shot already?

More positive more push for boosters and shots in children.

Deception.

You go in with flu-like symptoms.

You are given the standard PCR.

The test (run at a ridiculously-high Cycle threshold/35-45 Ct) picks up dead CV nucleotides...but not the common flu you actually have.

You receive a FALSE Positive for China Virus...while your common flu is misdiagnosed...and you get added to the CV statistics.

This was already a known problem with PCR tests...and became intentionally used to drastically inflate China Virus cases, while misdiagnosing common flu cases.

This is why common influenza almost vanished during the pandemic.

FAUCI:

"What is now sort of evolving into a bit of a standard," Fauci said, is that "if you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more ... the chances of it being replication-confident are minuscule."

"It's very frustrating for the patients as well as for the physicians," he continued, when "somebody comes in, and they repeat their PCR, and it's like [a] 37 cycle threshold, but you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle."

"So, I think if somebody does come in with 37, 38, even 36, you got to say, you know, it's just dead nucleotides, period."

principia-scientific.com...

Dr. Vincent Racaniello (Higgins Professor at Columbia University's Department of Microbiology & Immunology/Host of This Week in Virology):

"I agree that in general, Ct values over 36 do not represent infectious virus, only pieces of viral RNA,"

a reply to: IAMTAT

Well that will be one more boost for the anti viral medications that nobody wanted because of side effects, now everybody going sick with flu symptoms be covid or not will get an antiviral, more money for big pharma.

Wow, its almost as if you need to read it again, maybe 100 times....a reply to: LordAhriman

originally posted by: LordAhriman
Read it again. Then keep reading it until you understand it. This has been debunked probably 100 times on reddit in the last few days.

Did you just actually refer someone to Reddit for a debunk?

Maybe you should read it again, because it definitely doesn't say what you said it said.

a reply to: Iamonlyhuman

All of these tests are highly accurate and SCIENCEY!!!

Kids use fruitjuice to create false positives.

AMERICA’S FRONTLINE DOCTORS LAWSUIT PART 1: THE BIG LIE - July 24 2021

......The 67-page lawsuit is full of evidence and expert testimony dismantling the so-called “emergency” and the efficacy of the shots. But to start, it’s important to look at the big lie, that is the pandemic that never was which has been used to exert authoritarian control over the American people.

As the lawsuit states, the “legal purpose of an emergency declaration is to bypass checks and balances typically required under law due to a crisis and that the use of such declaration for such an arbitrary purpose could undermine the balance of power between the various branches of government.”

To continue the EUAs, the DHHS must meet criteria which the lawsuit alleges it has not, starting with the criteria that there must be “a serious or life-threatening disease or condition.”

“The emergency declaration and its multiple renewals are illegal, since in fact there is no underlying emergency,” the lawsuit states. “Assuming the accuracy of Defendants’ COVID-19 death data, SARS-CoV-2 has an overall survivability rate of 99.8% globally, which increases to 99.97% for persons under the age of 70, on a par with the seasonal flu. However, Defendants’ data is deliberately inflated.”

The DHHS changed the rule on March 24, 2020, which artificially inflated the death numbers from COVID-19, according to the lawsuit, with the rule change literally stating “assumed” deaths should be listed as COVID-19. And as we know, hospitals were financially incentivized. At least 95% of deaths listed as “caused” by the virus were among people with at least 4 comorbidities. The Centers for Disease Control admits the numbers are rigged: “The rules for coding and selection of the underlying cause of death are expected to result in COVID-19 being the underlying cause more often than not.”

“Even if there is some asymptomatic transmission, in all the history of respiratory borne viruses of any type, asymptomatic transmission has never been the driver of outbreaks. The driver of outbreaks is always a symptomatic person, even if there is a rare asymptomatic person that might transmit, an epidemic is not driven by asymptomatic carriers,” Fauci said at a Sept. 9, 2020 press conference, according to the lawsuit.

a reply to: MetalThunder

I been following this for a while, but you know big pharma lawyers are all over it, taking into consideration that the fascist big pharma with their lap dogs in CDC and government have money and can change laws is going to drag indefinitely.

If they work I’m excited about it. It’s exhausting running 2-3 different swabs on one patient all day over and over hahaha.

a reply to: PeteMitchell

All that DNA collected from people is going to be the biggest Data mine of all, now they can tag everybody almost in the entire world.

China is love it.

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: PeteMitchell

All that DNA collected from people is going to be the biggest Data mine of all, now they can tag everybody almost in the entire world.

China is love it.

The equipment isn’t connected to a network. We get a print out. We simply result positive or negative for the doc to see

a reply to: PeteMitchell

That sounds encouraging, soo what they do with the swabs, they disposed of them in a safe matter?