It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BatSars
ti-health.org...
I won't cover all of this, because a lot of it is typical corporate nonsense, but wanted to touch on a couple of things that stood out to me when reading this thing.
1) Part of the agreement forces Albania to acknowledge and agree that Pfizer's development of the vaccine is "aspirational in nature and subject to significant risks." It goes on to say that when a drug or other vaccine will "prevent, treat or cure COVID-19 infection" and that drugs gets authorization, that fact shouldn't "change the current situation of urgent needs for prevention of the spread of the COVID-19 infection that poses serious threats to and harmful effects on the lives and health of the general public."
So, even if there is a CURE for COVID-19, the purchaser has previously agreed that it doesn't change the need to 'prevent' the spread. Even another vaccine does not negate the emergency needs of their vaccine. I mean, whaa? Ivermectin, anyone?
2) According to the agreement, Pfizer is not liable for their own failure "to develop or obtain Authorization of the Product." Wait, come again? That one is a real head scratcher. Pfizer is not liable (meaning will not void the purchase agreement) should Pfizer fail to obtain authorization. LOL
It gets better ... Even if they get authorization, Pfizer isn't liable for failing "to deliver doses in accordance with any estimated delivery dates set forth herein ... nor shall any such failure give Purchaser any right to cancel orders for any quantities of Product."
Can you imagine getting a country to sign a statement like that? "Uh, yeah, well, even if we don't ship you any product, ya' know, we're not liable for anything that happens and you don't get to cancel anything." Yikes.
3) If someone else needs doses, Pfizer gets to reroute scheduled doses elsewhere and Albania agrees to all revisions. I imagine they put this in there to ensure those who are paying more per dose are given priority. I would imagine the US is paying the highest per-dose amount. I think we pay like $19.90/dose ? That leads me to #4
4) They're getting each dose at $12 a pop yet only purchased, what, 250k doses? Crazy how the US gets to subsidize everyone else's pharmaceutical costs.
5) Pfizer can be held responsible for absolutely nothing, at any time.
6) The Albanian government MUST, within 30 days, defend Pfizer in court from any suit. If Albania fails to do so, Pfizer made them agree to allow Pfizer to take full control of the suit then charge Albania all costs associated with the defense.
Can you imagine telling someone "you have to defend me in court and if you don't, you have to pay me to defend myself."
7) Part of the agreement is that Albania must pass laws, essentially, that would cover all requirements within the contract and to defend them from liability or any claims/losses that may be connected to the vaccine.
****
There are a lot of other unsavory aspects to this agreement, but the purpose of this post was to showcase the absolutely one-sided agreements these pharma companies are getting these countries to sign ... not to mention pricing that makes absolutely NO SENSE whatsoever. Buy fewer doses? You get a lower price!
They're bullies. The "experts" have scared the globe to death, and in desperation, these countries have signed away their lives to these pharmaceutical companies. No liability, no refunds, no right to sue, no right to not defend Pfizer in court, and if they do, they get charged for Pfizer defending itself.
These are bully tactics. This is one of the worst and most one-sided contracts I've ever seen. I mean, typically the ToS of websites are quite selfish in that the user has no right to anything laid out in the agreement, but this is crazy. I don't think I've seen anything this bullying as it relates to a country's agreement with a private corporation. Total insanity.
Thoughts?
originally posted by: Joneselius
a reply to: BatSars
People took this shot.
Let that sink in. People, actual people, have taken this shot when Pfizer themselves are telling us "Hey, we don't know what this is going to do, but when it kills you thanks for the data".....
originally posted by: MDDoxs
originally posted by: Joneselius
a reply to: BatSars
People took this shot.
Let that sink in. People, actual people, have taken this shot when Pfizer themselves are telling us "Hey, we don't know what this is going to do, but when it kills you thanks for the data".....
Approximately 2.5 billion took the shot. Something must have convinced them to do so. That is a lot of people to trick.
originally posted by: Joneselius
a reply to: BatSars
People, actual people, have taken this shot when Pfizer themselves are telling us "Hey, we don't know what this is going to do,
originally posted by: Silcone Synapse
If I provided a service-lets say I fix leaky gas boilers,but for me to do that job you must first sign a form which states that if your house burns down after I "fix" your boiler,I bear zero responsibility,and you are going to have to use me to fix any other gas problems in the future,even if your new home burns down.
originally posted by: BatSars
ti-health.org...
I won't cover all of this, because a lot of it is typical corporate nonsense, but wanted to touch on a couple of things that stood out to me when reading this thing.
1) Part of the agreement forces Albania to acknowledge and agree that Pfizer's development of the vaccine is "aspirational in nature and subject to significant risks." It goes on to say that when a drug or other vaccine will "prevent, treat or cure COVID-19 infection" and that drugs gets authorization, that fact shouldn't "change the current situation of urgent needs for prevention of the spread of the COVID-19 infection that poses serious threats to and harmful effects on the lives and health of the general public."
So, even if there is a CURE for COVID-19, the purchaser has previously agreed that it doesn't change the need to 'prevent' the spread. Even another vaccine does not negate the emergency needs of their vaccine. I mean, whaa? Ivermectin, anyone?
2) According to the agreement, Pfizer is not liable for their own failure "to develop or obtain Authorization of the Product." Wait, come again? That one is a real head scratcher. Pfizer is not liable (meaning will not void the purchase agreement) should Pfizer fail to obtain authorization. LOL
It gets better ... Even if they get authorization, Pfizer isn't liable for failing "to deliver doses in accordance with any estimated delivery dates set forth herein ... nor shall any such failure give Purchaser any right to cancel orders for any quantities of Product."
Can you imagine getting a country to sign a statement like that? "Uh, yeah, well, even if we don't ship you any product, ya' know, we're not liable for anything that happens and you don't get to cancel anything." Yikes.
3) If someone else needs doses, Pfizer gets to reroute scheduled doses elsewhere and Albania agrees to all revisions. I imagine they put this in there to ensure those who are paying more per dose are given priority. I would imagine the US is paying the highest per-dose amount. I think we pay like $19.90/dose ? That leads me to #4
4) They're getting each dose at $12 a pop yet only purchased, what, 250k doses? Crazy how the US gets to subsidize everyone else's pharmaceutical costs.
5) Pfizer can be held responsible for absolutely nothing, at any time.
6) The Albanian government MUST, within 30 days, defend Pfizer in court from any suit. If Albania fails to do so, Pfizer made them agree to allow Pfizer to take full control of the suit then charge Albania all costs associated with the defense.
Can you imagine telling someone "you have to defend me in court and if you don't, you have to pay me to defend myself."
7) Part of the agreement is that Albania must pass laws, essentially, that would cover all requirements within the contract and to defend them from liability or any claims/losses that may be connected to the vaccine.
****
There are a lot of other unsavory aspects to this agreement, but the purpose of this post was to showcase the absolutely one-sided agreements these pharma companies are getting these countries to sign ... not to mention pricing that makes absolutely NO SENSE whatsoever. Buy fewer doses? You get a lower price!
They're bullies. The "experts" have scared the globe to death, and in desperation, these countries have signed away their lives to these pharmaceutical companies. No liability, no refunds, no right to sue, no right to not defend Pfizer in court, and if they do, they get charged for Pfizer defending itself.
These are bully tactics. This is one of the worst and most one-sided contracts I've ever seen. I mean, typically the ToS of websites are quite selfish in that the user has no right to anything laid out in the agreement, but this is crazy. I don't think I've seen anything this bullying as it relates to a country's agreement with a private corporation. Total insanity.
Thoughts?
originally posted by: AaarghZombies
a reply to: BatSars
Standard agreement for a large capitalist organisation.
You see much the same for everything from clothes to computer software.
If you don't like it then vote for Hillary, because this is the price you pay living in a for profit environment.
Speaking as one of those 2.5 billion, its because many of us understand the science, or have had the science explained to us by people that we trust,...
...I've got family who were big pharma, and family in the Masons. They think it's safe.
...I see most of the arguments against vaxxing as being little more than fake scare stories by anti vaxxers.
...They're covering all of their bases just in case.
originally posted by: MDDoxs
My mortgage contract looks just as bad lol.
originally posted by: BatSars
ti-health.org...
I won't cover all of this, because a lot of it is typical corporate nonsense, but wanted to touch on a couple of things that stood out to me when reading this thing.