Originally posted by quango
If you deny the existence of morals and ethics as nothing more than tools of control, then what do you see replacing them?
Laws are only made because man is subjected (possessed) by the thinker. (Ego).
While a great tool, if used properly, it is a dangerous weapon in the hands of 'children'.
You know the fall from grace? Adam and Eve had a tree to eat from - why was it there?
Because it was a bad tree? No, it was there for them. All the trees were given to them to eat from...just in its right timing. Just like a babe cant
eat food at first...it has to start with 'mother milk'.
Well, Adam & Eve (allegorically speaking) reached out and grabbed hold of that which has plagued humanity ever since.
People identify with the ego, or stories and thoughts they have and conflict ensues.
Laws are there to protect mankind from himself.
"All things are permissible, but not all things are beneficial" - said Paul.
Sin in the greek means "missing the mark" like an archer with an arrow going to the bulls eye of a target.
Doe not mean that missing the mark is 'Evil', nor does it make that person bad.
It does mean that they missed the total or full picture of what is happening. They only have a part of the puzzle and mistake it for the whole.
Funny thing is that Christianity sins. It misses the mark frequently.
Its main doctrine of salvation is split into 3 areas. (always saved, loose your salvation and pick it up again...whoops lost it I think, where did it
go...and then predestined "you 'clay pot' are predestined for the 'kilns' of hell.) Quite contradictory and not useful for anyone looking into
Christianity. There is no assurance from the get go.
So, Christians have 'missed' the mark - on more than one thing.
Think about the fact that Jesus basically died because he didnt make Judas and the zealots happy by overthrowing the Roman Gov. Jesus wasnt about a
kingdom on earth - but today it appears he has changed his mind as holy wars have been led in his name since about the time he died.
Are Christians evil then? I ask then, because this is how some 'classical christians' treat the 'unbeliever'. In a sense, the 'classical
christian' is no better than the muslims that they are afraid of who want to impose their own view of things.
Why not let God come down and settle it. Until then, learn to follow the Bible and love (acceptance) and non judgement (without excuses why we have
the right.) That is a starter.
So, in a society of 'enlightened' beings (which this society is sub 0 in that aspect) no you would not need laws, etc. And things that you think are
not permissible now, will be permissible later. (kind of like the allegory of the Lion laying down with the lamb. Or for the Jews the ability to eat
pork when 'Messiah' comes.) These are all allegories, that when understood, underpin the whole concept that we are but infants still on milk needing
to grow up before we take a bite of solid food.
That which is fine and healthy for an adult can be dangerous for a newborn. (honey for example.)
Peace
dAlen