It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The classified portion of the UAP report given to a select number of congressmen and senators relates to the following:
1 Energy Pulse Propulsion System (EPPS) projects
2 lon Propulsion Systems (PS)
3 Anti-gravity propulsion systems
4 Anti-Matter propulsion systems
5 Ramjet Hydrogen Propulsion Systems (RHPS)
6 Compressed Nuclear Propulsion Systems (CNPS)
7 Advanced use of exotic elements for energy research (ET related items)
8 The K-Song Energy/Propulsion System Research Project (KEPSRP)
All these highly classified projects are under the control of the Defense Advance Research Project Agency (DARPA) and being managed by a classified group called-Advance Group-6. All funding for these projects is black confidential funds appropriated under intelligence operations costs. Some funds come from private contractors.
Prototypes of fying crafts utilizing the above technology are being flown at Area 51 and Tonopah AFB Test Range.
Some of the UAPs observed in and around Nevada can be contributed [sic] to crafts using the above propulsion systems. However, none of the experimental crafts have flown outside the Nellis Test and Training Range. None of
these experimental crafts can be contributed [sic] to the sightings photographed by the US Navy.
The UAP Task Force Report was finally released to the public last week, generally being panned by the UFO community...
... He also shares information that was leaked to him describing the classified portion of the UAP report. This is unconfirmed and should be taken as such.
Maybe so with anything directly from the government.
originally posted by: mbkennel
Government doesn't necessarily lie but it likes to omit and you have to parse words carefully.
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
Maybe so with anything directly from the government.
originally posted by: mbkennel
Government doesn't necessarily lie but it likes to omit and you have to parse words carefully.
However, any "leaks" from unofficial sources like Dolan, claiming to be from official sources, are always highly suspect to me. For example the "leaked" "pyramid" "UFO" which appears to be simply bokeh, I have a hard time believing government analysts couldn't figure out it's not a pyramid. So the way it comes across to me is pretty much as a blatant lie, and no government official can be accused of "lying" since it's just a "leak".
"pyramid" "UFO" is not a pyramid.
I have no idea what makes you think that. How do you know it's not just an ordinary commercial jet coming in for a landing at Los Angeles? The video was made right under a major air corridor of such planes going to Los Angeles, and the "UAP" has flashing strobes just like commercial jets have. This is a shot from the video with the location the video was made circled in red, showing ordinary aircraft flying overhead.
originally posted by: TritonTaranis
But I think this particular video is of an unknown man made object/drone and likely a near peer tech, probably Russian or Chinese, Which the report has already concluded “some are adversary tech and drone” but some display tech which neither have
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
Maybe so with anything directly from the government.
originally posted by: mbkennel
Government doesn't necessarily lie but it likes to omit and you have to parse words carefully.
However, any "leaks" from unofficial sources like Dolan, claiming to be from official sources, are always highly suspect to me. For example the "leaked" "pyramid" "UFO" which appears to be simply bokeh, I have a hard time believing government analysts couldn't figure out it's not a pyramid. So the way it comes across to me is pretty much as a blatant lie, and no government official can be accused of "lying" since it's just a "leak".
"pyramid" "UFO" is not a pyramid.
You say that like you know something. My whole point is "leaked" sources are not reliable. I say you don't know that, and further that your source is the same guy telling us it's a pyramid, and we know it's not a pyramid, so we know that's a lie or an extremely amateurish mistake for a professional filmmaker like Corbell.
originally posted by: TritonTaranis
Because the military couldn’t identify it, that’s why
I already said they could and can probably read the transponders of all those planes flying overhead. But, that's information the person recording that video wasn't looking at. I don't assume the cameraman was looking at the sensors which would identify ordinary aircraft, I assume he wasn't, he was looking at what his camera was recording, not looking at sensor data.
Pretty sure the military could identify a big large commercial airliner
TheDrive wrote an article about this event (see below) and said the sailors were using personal cameras to photograph the UFOs/UAPs, and it certainly looks like a personal camera video and not something from the navy's sensors. So the Navy probably knew exactly what that aircraft with the flashing strobes was is my guess, but if they get a video made with a personal camera that's out of focus and uncorrelated with sensor data, maybe they don't know what's on the personal camera video, that's why this whole thing is so ridiculous, using personal cameras to make out of focus videos, when they have such advanced sensors.
Or are you under the impression some deckhand on a ship just submitted his video into the pentagon report ?
I have no reason whatsoever to believe the navy sensors weren't picking up the "pyramid" thing with the flashing strobe lights in the video, and if I had to guess I would bet they did. The photographer making that video may not know exactly what the sensors showed for that, he wasn't looking at the sensors.
My impressions are this ship was observing something it’s censores wasn’t picking up and this was the only evidence they have of that particular incident, where a swarm of unidentifiable drones buzzed the ship
There might have been some drones flying around but I don't think that "pyramid" object was one of them. Most of the UFO information "leaking" since 2017 is highly suspect, and I don't take any claims at face value without any proof. Most of the proof I do have is that there appears to be some kind of misdirection taking place on a large scale, so leaked sources especially shouldn't be trusted.
I mean I don’t know perhaps they put the lights on the drones to avoid collisions ?
I'm not sure what you mean by "offiical Navy leaks", the fact they are leaks makes them unofficial, doesn't it? What is more official are the ships logs FOIA'd by TheDrive, you can see some of those in their article.
originally posted by: mbkennel
I think offiical Navy leaks are intended as coded messages to Chinese intelligence as deterrent regarding missile decoys/defense, without giving any specific technology details that could be countermeasured.
Yes great methods showing an out of focus pyramid, it's completely useless for analyzing the UAP, or possibly it's very useful if the purpose is misdirection and misinformation.
Though an Aegis-equipped ship like the USS Kidd has some of the most sophisticated sensors on earth, sailors equipped with consumer-grade cameras act as a kind of nimble spotting and event recording team, able to quickly adapt to changing conditions while providing situational awareness and recording what they see through traditional video and photo methods.
originally posted by: Ectoplasm8
a reply to: Lucidparadox
So alien beings just happen to create a spacecraft with the exact same design as the Batman balloon as shown?
originally posted by: HawkEyi
a reply to: Encia22
Interesting. So according to the report none of the reports of the UFOs seen by the Navy are from the ones that are being supposedly tested by the US govt with the technology being mentioned in the report?
originally posted by: mbkennel
a reply to: Encia22
And where would Navy projects to make missile decoys from directed energy be? Not at Area-51 and probably not at DARPA.
MDA? ONR?
None of these experimental craft can be contributed to the sighting contributed by the US Navy...