It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Illinois business leaders are worried after Springfield lawmakers twice passed a state budget, but neither time addresses the state’s Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund that is as much as $8 billion underwater.
I think they should just be allowed to fail. Maybe they should go into bankruptcy and be broken up into smaller pieces with some of those pieces being absorbed by neighbors and other bits reorganizing into new entities.
originally posted by: ketsuko
No. The other states do not bail them out. With the amount of money these states are in hock, I'm not sure it's possible outside of the other states collapsing themselves.
And the problem travels up to the Federal level too.
I think they should just be allowed to fail. Maybe they should go into bankruptcy and be broken up into smaller pieces with some of those pieces being absorbed by neighbors and other bits reorganizing into new entities.
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: NotGuilty
a reply to: ketsuko
I don’t know much about economics or government. But I do know somethings wrong when BP is too big to fail, but Illinois isn’t.
Nothing should ever have been too big to fail.
And that’s what it seems like. The Whitehouse and Schatz proposal, plethora of redistribution schemes included to counterbalance the extreme, regressive nature of the carbon tax system. Because again, once implemented, the reality of higher energy costs, it’s funny, Washington doesn’t seem to be able to note that that is a part of the inflation equation, I’m not sure they can even spell inflation. But the reality of higher energy costs being passed through to society as a regressive tax, who does it hit most? Lower-income families. Hits them hardest on a relative basis. So the answer in a command and control system in this proposed legislation, when there is a negative implication coming from policy A, then it necessitates that you create policy B and C and D to counterbalance it. Handouts, that dividend check, 75% of the revenue that goes into the dividend check, it’s a part of the revenue redistribution to counteract the inflationary cost of energy and rising prices more generally.
Never heard of the GEF, or debt-for-nature swaps, or the proceedings of the 4th Wilderness Congress? Of course you haven't. The powers-that-shouldn't-be have decided it's better for their scheme if you don't. After all, as David Lang was so quick to remind us at the 4th World Wilderness Congress, we're just the cannon fodder that unfortunately populates the earth.
But at least now you know what to answer when someone asks you what the second most powerful bank is.
originally posted by: EdisonintheFM
a reply to: JAGStorm
North Carolina has a surplus of...
6 billion clams...
and isn't sure what to do with it...
And "who" is it that is clueless as to what to do with $6 billion in revenue....
Seriously?
originally posted by: ketsuko
I think they should just be allowed to fail. Maybe they should go into bankruptcy and be broken up into smaller pieces with some of those pieces being absorbed by neighbors and other bits reorganizing into new entities.