Darkhorse Podcast with Robert Malone

I really thought I'd find this mentioned here but I don't see it anywhere. There are mentions of Dr. Robert Malone, but this particular podcast - which seems to have ignited something of a firestorm amongst people who are listening - doesn't seem to have been mentioned here on ATS.

The host, Dr. Robert Malone and another guest discuss in depth the resistance that they've encountered in the medical industry to clearing Ivermectin as a prophylactic and treatment for the WuFu. It's amazing and frustrating to listen to. They present much sound evidence that deserves consideration (very little of it new to me as I've followed this and the fight against HCQ by money-grubbing big-pharma).

I've been considering for several weeks starting my family (myself, my wife and our daughter) on a course of Ivermectin and what I heard here pushed me to do it. We live in a very rural area of our resident country and there's pretty much no presence of the WuFlu out where we are, though several friends have sadly taken the shot. I can get Ivermectin OTC and plan to do it soon. I've studied the iMask protocol and other recommendations and plan to follow a slightly modified version of that. I've actually researched availability and cost of the drugs and supplements and figure we can do a year-long course with D3, C and Zinc for about $150 each.

The podcast is is about three hours long, but I recommend you give it a listen. It was broadcast June 11 on Darkhorse Podcast. You can easily find it by searching on Duckduckgo.com for "darkhorse podcast how to save the world, in three easy steps". I'll include a few links below so you can find it at Spotify, Apple, etc. (CommieTube deleted it for violating fascist guidelines.)

I just saw that someone else re-posted it on Commietube CommieTube. Don't know how long until they kill this one, but I'll post it on my acc't when they do and add that link further on. Here is is for now, with a few podcast audio links below.,,



On Spotify
Apple Podcast

Go listen!

a reply to: incoserv

Excellent podcast...worth the full listen...and discussed a few times on ATS.
This is the podcast that got Dr. Malone banned from Linkedin and Wikipedia.

a reply to: incoserv

At my hospital, we were lucky to be acquainted with a pediatric internist, a foreign medical graduate but US citizen, further even serving in the US national guard, whom introduced the rest of us locally to ivermectin early, and off the record. We have been using it as needed for over a year now. Thank you, Dr. *******. He was the earliest, most 'right' person on ivermectin effectiveness vs COVID whom I have met, and it was because he read foreign (not US) medical research from the start. Because of him, we built a local stockpile for 'off label' use. He is from the south Pacific area originally, and great at thinking 'outside the box'. He (and all others just like him) cannot be thanked enough.

The United States government / medical complex, unfortunately, is no longer the best source for providing cutting edge medical knowledge, ESPECIALLY about COVID, and who knows what else at this point? Just saying.

The resistance that Dr. Malone has encountered is par for the course in the US at least, and probably many other places too. Sux.

a reply to: Fowlerstoad

I expected (and still expect) some of the vaccine crowd to come here and crow about their "experts." A friend once told me that the definition of expert is as follows:

ex - a has-been
spurt - a drip under pressure.

This, I think, is a perfect description of our modern "experts," like Tony Fauci (can't bring myself - out of what little respect remains in me for the medical profession - to put "Dr." in front of that name).

Your friend is, as was commented at one point in this podcast, a true scientist who is using the scientific method, testing hypotheses, observing the outcome and adjusting course based on empirical data. I'd love to send you a few bucks to buy the man a beer.

You are right; it's a damn shame what the modern medical industry has become. Greedy bastards!

:

If you can get Ivermectin, do so!!
I was told by my physician’s secretary, that I was “red-flagged” for requesting Ivermectin. My doctor, the office nurse AND secretary all let me know that they will NOT be getting The Jab BUT since the office is owned by the hospital, they are NOT ALLOWED to discuss Ivermectin nor prescribe it. I’m in the market for a new doctor not owned by the two hospital groups here.
If their vauxxine works, then why do I need it?
Conversely, if their vauxxine doesn’t work then why do I need it??
Not afraid of vaccines; we are all fully vaccinated but THIS is NOT a vaccine. reply to: incoserv

Kima reply to: incoserv

I am so very glad to be out of the US medical system. Most Americans think that where I am is a backwards place regarding medical care, bit my wife and I have each had surgery here once - surgery that we never would have been able to afford in the US. And the professionalism, care and attention are always way the hell above anything we've experienced in the US.

originally posted by: UnRepentantHarlequin
reply to: incoserv
Not afraid of vaccines; we are all fully vaccinated but THIS is NOT a vaccine.

I find it extremely puzzling that pro-vaxxers will proudly proclaim 'we are all fully vaccinated', then turn around and vilify this non-vaxx jab that is being pushed by all of the very same people that have been pushing all of the other vaccinations for decades.

Doesn't this raise a massive red flag for you? I mean, if they are lying so badly about this one, what makes you think they haven't been lying about all of the others all these years?

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: UnRepentantHarlequin
reply to: incoserv
Not afraid of vaccines; we are all fully vaccinated but THIS is NOT a vaccine.

I find it extremely puzzling that pro-vaxxers will proudly proclaim 'we are all fully vaccinated', then turn around and vilify this non-vaxx jab that is being pushed by all of the very same people that have been pushing all of the other vaccinations for decades.

Doesn't this raise a massive red flag for you? I mean, if they are lying so badly about this one, what makes you think they haven't been lying about all of the others all these years?

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: UnRepentantHarlequin
reply to: incoserv
Not afraid of vaccines; we are all fully vaccinated but THIS is NOT a vaccine.

I find it extremely puzzling that pro-vaxxers will proudly proclaim 'we are all fully vaccinated', then turn around and vilify this non-vaxx jab that is being pushed by all of the very same people that have been pushing all of the other vaccinations for decades.

Doesn't this raise a massive red flag for you? I mean, if they are lying so badly about this one, what makes you think they haven't been lying about all of the others all these years?

Data and the eradication of disease. Time tested vaccines for serious diseases are a scientific miracle in thwarting catastrophes.

a reply to: tanstaafl
I don’t know enough about Ivermectin, so I won’t condone that treatment over another.

There are vaccinations that have longitudinal research meaning years of evidence in efficacy and long term risks. This is an important part of science that isn’t always included in current pushes for the COVID vax. I am thrilled that we have a medication manufactured at breakneck speed during a pandemic. That’s truly remarkable and I’m obviously hopeful this vaccination has no long term effect and is as effective as it seems. But we would be doing the exact opposite of “relying on science” by just taking the vaccination. Science is rigorous throughout the methodology testing hypotheses and continuing further research into these studies. A flu vacc has documented risks, timelines of effectiveness, performance expectations, etc. covid vaccinations are too new to have all or most of this.

I think people not taking the vaccination are in fact actually taking the scientific approach. Even FDA hasn’t approved the vaccination other than emergency use due to the need for continued science on the topic.

So really, we can be pro vaccinations and attest to those while not taking a covid vaccination all in the name of science.

originally posted by: FreeOrigin
Data and the eradication of disease. Time tested vaccines for serious diseases are a scientific miracle in thwarting catastrophes.

But there are lots of questions about 'the data'.

I have seen supposedly authoritative charts that are very revealing, exposing the fact that the incidence of disease were all well on their way down well before the vaccines were introduced, and it was due to much improved sanitation practices, not vaccines. The mad scientists simply hijacked this fact to make the false claim that it was the vaccines.

Also, there is a very interesting rabbit hole regarding the history of polio - how the definition has been changed multiple times over the years in order give the appearance of whatever tptb wanted being related to DDT use, the latest in order to be able to make the claim that it was eradicated, when it wasn't, and to hide the fact that all of the modern cases are due to the vaccinations themselves.

These people are SICK.

Good point.
Firstly, I was vaccinated before I learned how to use a spoon. As a parent, I presented the pediatrician my childhood vaccine booklet and instructed only those vaccines for my children. As a cardiac cath lab specialist, I listened, researched and learned. Pharmaceutical Reps bought lunches for medical team to gain access to physicians’ ear. If something is truly good, people should not have to be bribed/coerced/forced to take it.
I never received a free “anything”, lottery ticket, freedom or other rights taken away then “given back” upon receipt of a vaccine, only pain/fever/swelling at injection site.
Perhaps the vaccines I have been administered in the past have kept me healthy and perhaps my education has fine-tuned my bulls##t detector.
Don’t know. I only know that was has been done, cannot be undone. Choose wisely.
a reply to: tanstaafl

originally posted by: FreeOrigin

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: UnRepentantHarlequin
reply to: incoserv
Not afraid of vaccines; we are all fully vaccinated but THIS is NOT a vaccine.

I find it extremely puzzling that pro-vaxxers will proudly proclaim 'we are all fully vaccinated', then turn around and vilify this non-vaxx jab that is being pushed by all of the very same people that have been pushing all of the other vaccinations for decades.

Doesn't this raise a massive red flag for you? I mean, if they are lying so badly about this one, what makes you think they haven't been lying about all of the others all these years?

Data and the eradication of disease. Time tested vaccines for serious diseases are a scientific miracle in thwarting catastrophes.

If you are posting in favor of the WuFlu injectin (as seems to be the case), your cognitive dissonance is showing here.

By all means, a resounding YES regarding "time tested vaccines." The glitch here is that "time tested vaccines" need to be ... here it comes ... TIME TESTED!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This injection was passed by the FDA for EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION, which means that it ... here it comes ... IS NOT TIME TESTED!!!!!!!!!!!!!

So, there's that...

originally posted by: brianrook
a reply to: tanstaafl
I don’t know enough about Ivermectin, so I won’t condone that treatment over another. ...

I'm not condoning one of another, either. This is simply the choice that I have made for my family.

Howeve, in regards to not knowing enough about Ivermectin, there are volumes of information available about the medicine, its use, its history, potential side effects, etc. There's a lot of b.s. being slung about, too. If you "don't know enough," it's your own fault. Educate yourself. If you are a half-way intelligent person, you can learn a lot with the information that's on hand.

My wife had a medical issue a few years back. We saw a doctor about it and the doctor recommended surgery. It was very expensive and we (without medical insurance because Obamacare said we were too poor to have it - true story) couldn't really afford it. We went home, did some investigation and found an alternative therapy at literally the cost of about 1% of the surgery. When we went back to see the doctor, she was impressed. I remember her exact words:

Most of my patients just want me to tell the something that will take care of the issue immediately. You two have done your research and clearly understand what's going on. I recommend this therapy.

We proceeded with the therapy (paid out of pocket) and it was a success.

A person of average intelligence can figure out what's going on around him. To say that you "don't know enough" is to essentially admit your own lazy, willful ignorance.

originally posted by: incoserv

originally posted by: FreeOrigin

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: UnRepentantHarlequin
reply to: incoserv
Not afraid of vaccines; we are all fully vaccinated but THIS is NOT a vaccine.

I find it extremely puzzling that pro-vaxxers will proudly proclaim 'we are all fully vaccinated', then turn around and vilify this non-vaxx jab that is being pushed by all of the very same people that have been pushing all of the other vaccinations for decades.

Doesn't this raise a massive red flag for you? I mean, if they are lying so badly about this one, what makes you think they haven't been lying about all of the others all these years?

Data and the eradication of disease. Time tested vaccines for serious diseases are a scientific miracle in thwarting catastrophes.

If you are posting in favor of the WuFlu injectin (as seems to be the case), your cognitive dissonance is showing here.

By all means, a resounding YES regarding "time tested vaccines." The glitch here is that "time tested vaccines" need to be ... here it comes ... TIME TESTED!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This injection was passed by the FDA for EMERGENCY USE AUTHORIZATION, which means that it ... here it comes ... IS NOT TIME TESTED!!!!!!!!!!!!!

So, there's that...

Hi friend, no need to caps and bold me your point. I get it.

I'd not specified, but if you were asking, I'm referring to historical vaccines that generate a more traditional antibody response, ie tetanus. HepB, etc...

I agree with Brian. The scientific approach is more prudent when assessing the current situation. Take from that what you will.