CDC Members Own More Than 50 Patents Connected to Vaccinations

CDC Members Own More Than 50 Patents Connected to Vaccinations

Possible conflict of interested, or is this just status quo?

Years ago ethics were a thing, or at least it was part of the picture, nowadays it seems we have a morally bankrupt society.

Wouldn't this be equivalent to insider trading?

A Long List of Patents Owned by ACIP and Other CDC Members The following is a partial list of some of the patents that are owned or shared by members of the CDC and/or ACIP committee, including Dr. Paul Offit: "Nucleic acid vaccines for prevention of flavivirus infection" - This patent comes into play during the manufacturing process of vaccines for yellow fever, Zika, Dengue, West Nile virus and more. Various vaccination testing methods - When pharmaceutical companies need to test aspects of a new vaccine, they may utilize one of the CDC's patented testing methods including an artificial lung system for aerosol vaccines and a process that screens new vaccines for human rhinoviruses. Adjuvant patents - Adjuvants are components within vaccinations intended to create an intensified immune reaction; members of the ACIP own patents on adjuvants used specifically in vaccinations created for premature babies and full term newborns.

Assays that assist vaccine development - During the vaccine development process, manufacturers will often observe biological samples for specific antibodies; the CDC owns a patent on an assay that facilitates this monitoring system. Vaccine quality control - patents on various aspects of quality control for vaccinations are utilized by pharmaceutical companies on a large scale once a new vaccine is actively distributed to the public.

Anyone see anything wrong with these numbers? Would even one be ok?

In total, 56 individual patents were found to be owned or shared by one or more members of the ACIP committee or other committees within the CDC.

How exactly can someone be unbiased in this situation?

Members Claim They are Unbiased When prompted with questions pertaining to their financial connections with pharmaceutical companies, most ACIP members claim they are able to remain unbiased despite the rewards they receive every time a new vaccination is recommended to the public. In numerous instances, vaccines released to the market are later removed after serious side effects are documented. The rotavirus vaccine was one such example; it was pulled from the market in 1999, a year after its initial approval.


In 2001, the House Government Reform Committee found that four out of the eight ACIP members who voted to approve the vaccine had direct financial ties to one or more of the pharmaceutical companies who produced the vaccine for public use. Similar situations involving many other vaccinations have been independently documented over the course of nearly 20 years.

a reply to: Realtruth

Just setting this down for a minute...

No wonder it'$ a pandemic 😃

a reply to: Realtruth

Status Quo. The American Way

This is really shocking—the fact that the Center for Disease Control is staffed by people who are smart enough to invent methods for controlling diseases. What’s next, airlines run by people who know how to fly airplanes? Somebody needs to do something about this alarming level of competence. Maybe we should fire anyone with a PhD and replace them all with plumbers, truck drivers, and English majors. I’m just spitballing it here. a reply to: Realtruth

a reply to: IAMTAT
Curious why canada is so involved in the american cdc.

a reply to: 1947boomer

I’m just spitballing it here.

It's evident you didn't put much thought in your reply.

This isn't what you described. There's a direct conflict of interest and if that's not enough, look at what IAMTAT provided. If the CDC has influence on the health system and many of the board heads hold medical patents, you really can not see the conflict of interest here?

a reply to: ThatDamnDuckAgain

an advice, never ever have a descusion with a person who had the chivax, its unhealthy and stressfull

a reply to: Dr UAE
As I wrote in a different thread, you don't talk bad about the car (insert anything that requires a decision) you just bought. Well I would, but then I am not concerned about others thinking I make bad decisions, because I know they do too.

They just don't admit it.

So in this case, there was a decision made about injecting a foreign substance into their bodies with the promise of staying safe. Admitting that it was a bad idea would be evidence of a bad decision and being driven by fear.

So the vaccination is safe and no doubts can be allowed to form or even be voiced to the rest of the world.

a reply to: Realtruth

Yes, the Devil is in the Details. Career bureaucrats with vested interests have been controlling our society for the last year, and it was all planned years in advance. The Medical Industrial Complex has scored a major success story in the capitalist world. They sold a story, complete with special effects provided by MSM, that scared people sufficiently to have them stand in line to take a shot, paid in large part by tax payer dollars.

The patents are proof of the vested interests. David Martin has investigated the records of the US Patent Office for close to a year. It helped him construct the Fauci Dossier.

originally posted by: Realtruth
Years ago the appearance of ethics were a thing,

Fixed that for ya...

I think there should be a law against that. I would bet the research to create the evidence for the patents was paid for by our tax dollars, the USA should hold the patents.

a reply to: Realtruth

Dr. Fauci was "miffed" over why only about 50% of employees at the CDC-NIH-FDA have opted to be injected with the experimental Covid-19 drugs.

He's too close to the forest, lol. Obviously they DONT TRUST their leaders.

DUH!

originally posted by: 1947boomer
This is really shocking—the fact that the Center for Disease Control is staffed by people who are smart enough to invent methods for controlling diseases. What’s next, airlines run by people who know how to fly airplanes? Somebody needs to do something about this alarming level of competence. Maybe we should fire anyone with a PhD and replace them all with plumbers, truck drivers, and English majors. I’m just spitballing it here. a reply to: Realtruth

This times 100, this is exactly how things should be. Smart people in a government agency making thing to help people.

You'd prefer faceless companies owning these patent?

originally posted by: rickymouse
I think there should be a law against that. I would bet the research to create the evidence for the patents was paid for by our tax dollars, the USA should hold the patents.

That sounds like... Socialism.

People should be able to profit from their inventions

originally posted by: xuenchen
No wonder it'$ a pandemic 😃

The people who made the real money were home delivery business like amazon, and the scalpers selling ppe and hand sanitizer for more money than heroine.

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: Realtruth

Just setting this down for a minute...

Very interesting list mate - some familiar names on there which also just happen to be on the partner list for the World Economic Forum.

When it comes to the CDC not being exclusively government controlled then it also looks like their private funding mechanism is a 5013c foundation listed on the Dun & Bradstreet database.

Some people have questioned my concern over both the CDC and John Hopkins University is a PRIVATE organization where the CDC accepts private funding – NOT ONLY GOVERNMENT! The CDC is quasi-government under the Department of Health and Human Services which strangely has sources of funding that are predicated on the fact that it also has a private 501(c)(3) public charity, like the Clinton Foundation.

link

originally posted by: AaarghZombies

originally posted by: rickymouse
I think there should be a law against that. I would bet the research to create the evidence for the patents was paid for by our tax dollars, the USA should hold the patents.

That sounds like... Socialism.

People should be able to profit from their inventions

It isn't their invention, most times the government paid for the research that led to the creation of the meds....the people should hold the patents since the taxpayers paid for most everything. But these individuals working for the government in conjunction with the Pharma companies profit off of the medical treatment patents.

I am not fond of socialism but since we pay for most of the medical research these days, medicine should be socialized medicine. Excessive Profiting off of people's ill health has been considered Taboo for thousands of years up till recently.

originally posted by: rickymouse
I think there should be a law against that. I would bet the research to create the evidence for the patents was paid for by our tax dollars, the USA should hold the patents.

I think maybe here on the US side, the Bayh-Dole Act comes into play. It should be repealed.