It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tanstaafl
originally posted by: MiddleInsite
Well then I suggest she find her way to the nearest Court house and present that evidence.
This isn't an issue for the courts to decide. This is a political question, that will be decided by the people. That is what the audits, as official acts of the State Legislatures, engaged in one of their primary Constitutional duties, are doing, and what they decide is not reviewable by the courts..
How's that Durham report going?
Good question. Another good question is... why is he still an active Special Counsel?
How's the audit in Arizona going?
The audit in AZ is ahead of schedule (contrary to your tired false implication that they are somehow behind schedule) and in fact it is almost completed. They are just doing last minute triple checking before completing the final report which will reveal their findings.
See where I'm going?
Yes... a false/fake narrative, as always.
Saying it isn't evidence.
We are in agreement.
You think Republicans would get this by now.
You'd think that people like you would get that State Legislatures pursuing the evidence via lawful official forensic audits is actually how you determine the veracity of the claims.
You also typically ignore the glaring point that people who ignore massive evidence right under their noses and vilify and condemn lawful forensic audits either #1) have something to hide, #2) they just don't care because the cheating gave them the result they wanted, or #3) they are just incapable of rational thought.
So... which is it in your case?
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: incoserv
You know, I'm tired of people saying they have evidence.
Dammit, if you have it, MAKE IT PUBLIC!!!!
That's not how you tick-tock, bro. You need to hint that you have some game changing evidence but you don't release it. If you're really cool you'll name your evidence after a mythical aquatic creature like a sea serpent or giant squid. You also set the release date months out and tell people this will all happen 'any day'.
That's how to do a Quality evidence release.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
Na
The best way is to get your friends to do what you can't.
It occurs over, and over, and over.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: shooterbrody
Na
The best way is to get your friends to do what you can't.
It occurs over, and over, and over.
Which friends? Rudy Brown Sweats? Sidney's Bowel? This letter is all part of the QLARP.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
Too funny
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: shooterbrody
Too funny
Thank you, those clowns will be appearing all through the next election at the very least. It's like the new twoof movement.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
They show up in horrible hats and attempt to shout everyone down?
originally posted by: shooterbrody
Thought thst is what this thread was.
Someone putting out evidence.
Guess I was wrong......
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: shooterbrody
Let me know when the evidence shows up. Based on the previous releases we can expect that in 2000 and never.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
No
I am under no obligation to do anything for you.
Interesting who turns out to be entitled here.